Blog & Social

Social Engineering

I frequently share insights on the significance of Cyber Awareness Training and its critical role in helping organisations defend against cybercrime. Cyber awareness training is a vital aspect of contemporary security strategies for everyone. It provides employees with the essential knowledge and skills needed to identify, respond to, and reduce cyber threats. This training is particularly effective in combating social engineering.

While many people are now familiar with the term social engineering, they may not fully understand its meaning. In the context of cybersecurity, social engineering involves manipulating, influencing, or deceiving individuals to gain unauthorised access to IT systems or to steal personal and financial information. It employs psychological tricks to lead users into making security errors or divulging sensitive data. The most prevalent form of social engineering is phishing.

Social engineering heavily relies on the six Principles of Influence identified by Robert Cialdini, a behavioral psychologist and author of “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion.” These six principles are: Reciprocity, Commitment and Consistency, Social Proof, Authority, Liking, and Scarcity. Simply put, what these criminals seek is information, login credentials, passwords, names, phone numbers, and more. They are profiling your organisation to identify vulnerabilities, such as who manages accounts payable or whether you have an IT support company under contract that they could impersonate. In addition to phishing, they utilise various forms including vishing (voice phishing), smishing (SMS phishing), and simply calling to ask questions.

A rising threat that criminals are increasingly adopting is help desk social engineering tactics. In these schemes, attackers call an organisation’s IT help desk while posing as a legitimate employee, trying to convince the help desk agent to reset passwords or multi-factor authentication (MFA) for a specific account.

In recent years, this technique has been used to access single sign-on (SSO) accounts and cloud-based application suites. Multiple criminals adopted this approach in 2024, targeting academic and healthcare institutions; in these cases, attackers utilised compromised identities to extract data from cloud-based software as a service (SaaS) applications or alter employee payroll information.

IT help desks typically require employees requesting password and MFA resets to provide their full name, date of birth, employee ID, and manager’s name or answer a pre-set security question. However, cybercriminals attempting to socially engineer help desk personnel often answer these questions accurately. Much of this information is not confidential and can be found in public resources and social media sites. The dark web frequently harbours data that should remain private. At H2, we continuously scan the dark web for our clients to uncover any exposed information.

Often, help desk social engineering calls occur outside of regular working hours. This tactic allows criminals to maintain access to compromised accounts for longer periods before the legitimate account owner detects any suspicious activity. Attackers using this method may register their own devices for MFA to secure ongoing access to compromised accounts. They also frequently delete emails from compromised mailboxes related to suspicious account activities or configure mail transport rules to redirect relevant emails away from the main inbox.

Over the past year, several criminals have openly sought callers on popular forums. Advertisements typically call for English-speaking individuals familiar with RMM tools and experienced in conducting remote sessions. Some criminals are also exploring effective ways to spoof phone numbers or encrypt calls, ensuring caller IDs appear more credible. This trend suggests that phone-related social engineering will pose a significant threat in 2025 as demand for these capabilities increases.

So how can we combat this? I began with cyber awareness training, and I’ll conclude with it as well. When your staff, regardless of their technical expertise, understand what social engineering is and its intentions, they are much more likely to recognise it when it occurs. Simple practices such as asking unknown callers to call back using a verified number instead of one provided by the caller can make a difference. If you receive an email from a senior manager or board member that seems suspicious, open a new email thread for confirmation rather than replying directly, this helps avoid potential spoofing by scammers masquerading as legitimate sources. And of course, never click on links!

Cyber awareness training doesn’t need to be costly; it can be delivered face-to-face, online, or through automated means. At H2, we offer all these options! Regardless of your choice, please consider this training an essential component of your strategy.

The Internet of Things

There’s a lot being said in various quarters about the Internet of Things (IOT) but whenever it comes up in conversation with senior people in the SME world, even those businesses that are in the medium bracket, with significant numbers of employees, it raises a titter or two.

So, what is it and why would that be? According to Wikipedia IOT describes devices with sensors, processing ability, software and other technologies that connect and exchange data with other devices and systems over the Internet or other communication networks. The IOT encompasses electronics, communication, and computer science engineering and encompasses a vast array of devices — from household appliances to industrial equipment — all connected online. These devices often lack robust security features, making them susceptible to attacks. Common vulnerabilities include insecure firmware, weak authentication protocols and unsecured network services. For example, IOT devices can be compromised to create botnets that launch massive Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. As the IOT continues to grow, securing these devices becomes increasingly critical, necessitating the development of new security strategies that encompass IOT.

IOT in a nutshell then, does not just refer to everyday household items that have a processor and remote capability, but also systems within your business. For instance, if you can turn on your lights, start a cooker going, turn on the kettle etc, all from your phone on your way home, you can do the same on your way into work. And of course, we have Siri, and Alexa amongst other systems, all interconnected in some way in your home, and increasingly, in your office, and to the internet.

Whenever it’s discussed all the usual lighthearted comments about being hacked by your kettle, or held to ransom by your toaster, come out in the conversation. And there is some amusement to be had. But there is a serious side to this.

Increasingly now we are seeing smart appliances in the workplace, that could be used to jump onto the more serious elements of a network, we are already at a place where some functions, perceived as routine, even mundane, can already be used to jump onto other network devices. For instance, most have security cameras and alarm systems. Many of these are IP based and are connected via the LAN. OK, but many also are remotely maintained by a variety of suppliers. I have found it not uncommon for these suppliers to arrange for their own backdoor into the system to maintain these systems, often without the client knowing how that is done. This provides a very neat circuit around the router and firewall and, when most SME networks are flat, access onward to all parts of the network. A flat network refers to a network that is unsegmented ie all devices are attached to a single WIFI or wired network with no further network protection once through the gateway.

This of course is not the only example, but it shows how poor security architecture, often times by local network providers, can have a quite seriously detrimental effect. So, what I am saying is that as many more devices become ‘smart’ and interconnected via the LAN, security architecture becomes just as important for the SME as it does for the larger enterprise. The problem is that the awareness and support within the SME community and their suppliers, tends to be lacking.

These days we have to add in the move towards remote working, either full or part time, and the increasing use of AI, which adds many other threats to your systems, and I have explored these in other blogs, which you can view on my website, https://hah2.co.uk/news/. How many of your staff, using their home WIFI to connect to your company systems, also have IOT devices connected to the same WIFI router that they are using to connect to you? How are you managing that risk? Or are you?

Societal Perception of Cyber Security

Cyber Security continues to be, all too often, treated as an IT issue. Now this is a drum that cyber security professionals have been banging for a long long time. Cybersecurity is NOT and IT issue, it is very much a business issue. But we do struggle to get that across, particularly in the SME market who continue to view it as purely technical in nature.

Now, whilst I’m not always enthusiastic about the stats and reports that are published, simply because they tend to be industry publications with the authors often having an axe to grind but they can make some very good points. Let’s look at some key challenges being encountered:

Cybersecurity spending appears to be slowing (although that depends on who you speak to), while boards are starting to push back and ask what they have achieved after years of heavy cybersecurity spend.
Boards and senior executives are asking the wrong questions about cybersecurity, leading to poor investment decisions.
Many current approaches to improve cybersecurity are falling short of providing appropriate and defensible levels of protection.

SMEs are invariably focused on cost, which means optimising their spend to ensure that they get the biggest bang for their buck, to coin a phrase. However, time and again we see that they have spent, sometimes considerable, sums on technology without actually understanding what risks that technology is there to mitigate, therefore having no real idea if it is doing what they have been told its doing. The amount of money they are spending is of course relative. To a small business the sum invested might be a minor consideration to a much larger business. So, it becomes crucial that the mitigations put in place are appropriate to the risks they are there to mitigate.

This comes down to another drum we like to beat, that of risk management. Below is a link to a short video which explains the risk management process as it appertains to cyber security. Look at it with the view that it can be a matter of scale, and the smaller businesses may not need to go through the whole process but will need to go through much of it.

The risk management process

Note the I use the term mitigate rather than prevent. That’s simply because eradication of risk is simply not possible if you are going to continue to do business. The best you are going to achieve is to mitigate that risk to the lowest level achievable without getting in the way of business.

Let’s consider the following challenges and impacts:

Challenge	Impact
Societal perception of cybersecurity is that it is a technical problem, best handled by technical people, although that tends to be amongst the SME community. There is evidence though that that is changing slowly.	Societal perception is dominated by fear, uncertainty and doubt. It results in poor engagement with between management and suppliers, unproductive exchanges and unrealistic expectations. Ultimately, it leads to bad decisions and bad investments in cybersecurity.
Organisations are focused on the wrong questions about cybersecurity. The question of what do I need to buy to secure my data is asked rather than what do I need to secure and what is the priority.	Unproductive questions are indicative of poor understanding, and drive attention away from an improving that understanding and therefore drive better investments.
Current investments and approaches designed to address known limitations are not productive.	Many SMEs focused on technology and have a poor understanding of cyber risk management. This is often compounded by an equally poor understanding within the IT management company’s they often outsource to. This leads to a combination of poorly scoped solutions and all too often failed execution and unrealistic expectations.
Real failures are not getting enough attention to productively change behaviour.	Compliance with any regulation does not equal appropriate levels of protection.

Now, whilst some of these impacts may not be a 100% fit for many SMEs, particularly at the smaller end of the bracket, they are close enough to be taken very seriously indeed. Poor decisions are being taken every day in regard to the purchase of hardware and software to protect against cyber threats, without having carried out any kind of risk assessment to actually understand what risks they are trying to mitigate. End result, an investment in technology that on its own, will not prevent many of the cyber threats that abound today, coupled with a false sense of security.

A competent cyber security professional will approach the problem from the point of view of People, Process and Technology, understanding that many mitigations require a combination of 2 or 3 of those to provide an adequate response to the threat. For many SMEs, one of the biggest and quickest wins they can achieve is cyber awareness training for their staff. If their staff are aware of the issues, they have a much greater chance of recognising a scam, a phishing attack, an attempt at social engineering etc. And oftentimes such things can be mitigated by sound policies and processes. All of this prior to even considering spending money on technology. However, the very first thing that should be considered is to undertake a risk management process to identify the threats and vulnerabilities inherent in the business, thus enabling the risks to be identified and working out what mitigations are needed to drive the risks down to an acceptable level. SMEs almost never do this and it is a fundamental mistake.

Remote or Office? The Debate Goes On

Barely a week goes by without the remote working v office-based argument surfaces somewhere, usually it must be said, at the corporate level, although many SME owners remain nervous of it, with others downright against it. My client base appears to be largely OK with a hybrid model of working and only one is 100% remote based, having given up their office.

The COVID pandemic was the catalyst for this with businesses of all sizes being forced to transform their operations to support remote work and by and large have done well, but not without many challenges, including video conferencing burn out, (along with wishing they’d taken out shares in Zoom!!), and a yearning to work together in person again, someday. We all realise that group working, face to face, is often necessary not just for efficiency, but because we are social animals. Experience has taught many businesses many things but are often still struggling with the potentially dire consequences in terms of cyber security and data protection.

I should perhaps mention that in the corporate IT world, where I worked for many years for major system integrators like HP, hot desking and remote working was introduced in the early 2000s and therefore this was no problem for us.

A distributed work environment i.e., personnel spread around various locations, office, home working, even the local coffee shop, creates critical challenges and new security threats as a result. The speed with which this has happened has meant that many simply did not take cyber security issues into account and if they did, thought, well, this is temporary, and it won’t matter in the long run. Well perhaps, but as many are now finding, there have been advantages to home working, not least a lowering of costs in terms of how much office space is needed to carry out the business function. Many are now looking at Hybrid working i.e., from home with a day or two in the office during the week. There are pros and cons to this outside of the scope of this article, and businesses will have to make their own judgements, but one thing is clear and that is that businesses need to understand the risks now inherent in distributed work and need to get better at cyber security and data protection, in those environments.

Employees when remote working, are at much greater risk than those in offices. Since home connections are less secure, cybercriminals have an easier entry into the company network. Furthermore, the explosion of various online tools, solutions, and services for collaboration and productivity tend to have the bare minimum of security default setting, and updates from third-party vendors can change security preferences and be easily overlooked.

Phishing becomes an even greater threat to home workers simply because, in an office environment, they have access to colleagues and managers, who they can approach for advice and guidance. This is much harder to replicate with remote workers, especially those who may not be particularly tech savvy and who may not wish to become ‘burdensome’ to their co-workers.

Ransomware also enjoys an advantage in the remote working model. If their connection to the company is blocked, it is more difficult for workers to get assistance from the right experts and authorities. And since trust levels are lower when working from home, some workers will be concerned that they have “done something wrong” and so may be more reluctant to seek help. While this risk can be addressed by increased training, as well as messaging that vigilance and involving IT support will be rewarded, it can still be an uphill battle.

In a study carried out by Entrust it was clear that many organisations are grasping the concept of cyber awareness training, although there are still too few amongst SMEs that take this on board. Of those who responded to Entrust:

94% said employee training has a positive impact on data security.

95% agreed that they trust remote employees to comply with data security best practices and training.

93% said they felt positive about the impact data security training had on them.

Of course, this was a sampling and only 61% of employees said that their company offered training.

Whatever system of hybrid you are proposing to use, or are using, it is clear that you will need to go beyond baseline security measures. In this case we are almost certainly dealing with baseline protections such as multi-factor authentication, known as MFA or sometimes 2FA, and virtual private networks (VPNs). Both have their place and will be needed.

The Entrust report cites a contradiction here, and it’s one I have also noted. Many company owners/directors say they believe company data is protected with these baseline solutions, yet they also say that home internet connections, leaked sensitive company information and cyber-attacks are their top concerns.

If organisations are going to use hybrid work models successfully over the long term, then they will need to further invest in their security strategy. MFA and VPNs, while important, should be seen as part of a larger strategy for data security in a hybrid work model. Throughout and beyond the pandemic, bad actors have exploited security deficiencies of remote environments such as insecure home tech hardware, poor password hygiene and employee use of unapproved tools.

If you are going to adopt this new normal, or already have adopted it, then the process must start with understanding your risk posture which will inform you of what measures you need to take to secure your data. Below is a link to a short video explaining cyber risk management, at least at a high level.

https://bit.ly/3FdZ6x0

Once you have a clear understanding of what your risks are, then you might like to consider a zero-trust approach to data security.

With employees having the ability to work anywhere in a hybrid environment, the office perimeter is no longer relevant to digital security. Zero Trust frameworks are designed to apply the concept of least privileged access to people, systems and devices, giving these entities only the access they need to fulfil their role and nothing more. Additionally, a Zero Trust approach continually monitors user and device behaviour to identify suspicious patterns and take preventive action, including a step-up authentication challenge.

You may need to consider other protections such as:

Passwordless single sign on involving Privileged Access Management (PAM) to facilitate a Zero Trust approach.

Data Loss Prevention. Whilst a VPN will protect your data in transit, file level encryption ensures that it is protected at rest, at both ends of the tunnel, so that if it does get stolen or otherwise compromised, the impact is severely lessened. There is more information in the short video below.

https://bit.ly/4berDPa

Protective Monitoring. This has long been considered too expensive for an SME. Well, no longer, there is now a system which is effective and affordable and is explained in the video below.

https://bit.ly/3Qy4u0x

If you feel a no obligation chat about this would be helpful, give us a call.

DATA BREACHES

Data breaches continue to make headlines, with corporate incidents grabbing the most attention. A prime example is the Equifax breach, where a server exploit compromised credit reports of over 140 million individuals. The breach took months to discover and resolve, ultimately resulting in Equifax settling with the FTC for a $575 million fine.

Not so long ago the Electoral Commission revealed it fell victim to a “complex cyber-attack,” potentially impacting millions of voters. Unspecified “hostile actors” accessed electoral registers from August 2021 and infiltrated emails and control systems. Alarmingly, this attack went undetected until the following October, leaving sensitive data exposed to cyber criminals for over a year. It’s astonishing that adequate protections were not in place to ensure timely detection and management of the breach.

According to the UK’s NCSC, half of businesses and about a third of charities have reported experiencing some form of cyber security breach or attack. This figure rises to approximately 70% for medium-sized businesses and 74% for large enterprises. Phishing remains a favoured attack method due to its relative simplicity, with AI now generating new variations of old scams.

Most data breaches occur unintentionally, often due to employees making mistakes because they lack awareness of proper procedures. Who bears responsibility? Is it the employee or the employer for not providing sufficient cyber awareness training? That’s open to interpretation.

Here are some notable examples from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO):

• A data controller inadvertently sent paperwork to a child’s birth parents without redacting the adoptive parents’ names and addresses. Upon discovering the breach, the data controller failed to inform the adoptive parents.

• A debt insolvency agent mistakenly emailed a vulnerable new client’s file to a colleague in another department. The colleague quickly deleted the email and alerted the sender about the mistake.

• An employee misplaced his briefcase containing work on an unencrypted laptop and unredacted paper files related to a sensitive court case, which included information on criminal convictions and health details. Initially, he believed both the laptop was encrypted and that the paper files were redacted. After informing his manager, who reported it to IT, the laptop was remotely wiped without initially notifying the ICO. The data controller later reported it after realising the laptop was unencrypted.

• A courier mistakenly delivered medication intended for one patient (Patient A) to another (Patient B). After Patient A complained, the pharmacist recognised the error and arranged for the unopened medication to be picked up and delivered correctly.

• A law firm employee fell victim to a phishing attack after clicking on a link in an email that led them to enter login credentials on what they thought was a legitimate site. The IT department later discovered that their email account had been compromised, leading to significant unauthorised payments being made by clients due to spoofed communications.

These cases are just a small sampling.

Now let’s discuss ransomware. There’s a common misconception among SME management that ransomware primarily targets larger companies since SMEs seem too small to be lucrative targets for cybercriminals. However, when SMEs do get attacked, ransom demands can be surprisingly low—often between £500 and £1,000—leading many SMEs to pay up without hesitation. This poses significant risks because often their data has already been stolen, and sometimes criminals fail to restore access afterward, leaving SMEs financially strained and unable to operate.

Preventing such attacks in the first place is far more advantageous. Here are several strategies you might consider implementing:

• One of the most impactful steps an SME can take is providing Cyber Awareness Training for employees. Research shows that 90% of data breaches stem from human error; it’s unlikely an employee will intentionally harm your business. However, without proper training, they may unknowingly engage in risky behaviour. Cyber security awareness training is crucial; staff need knowledge about potential threats. Cyber security is not just an IT issue; it’s a business-wide responsibility that requires everyone’s involvement. Effective strategies tend to follow the KISS principle—Keep It Simple Stupid.

• Another cost-effective measure is developing robust policies and procedures related to cyber security that are communicated throughout your organisation and regularly updated to remain relevant. Providing employees with clear guidelines on how to respond if they suspect suspicious activity supports them rather than penalising them for mistakes. Many SMEs lack adequate policies or settle for generic templates found online that seldom meet their needs.

• Review your backup strategy as well. Even if using cloud-based services, your data may not be adequately secured, despite providers’ claims. A better approach would be implementing a backup strategy where your data is backed up nightly onto magnetic media storage that’s stored securely offline. In case of an attack that locks your data, you could wipe affected workstations and restore information from backups without significant downtime.

• EMail remains one of the most common attack vectors. Numerous products claim to block malicious emails effectively; many excel at this task. For SMEs, cost is often a deciding factor when selecting these products. Unfortunately, some still opt for low-cost or free anti-malware solutions. Understanding that quality correlates with price is essential; if it’s free, you’re likely facing issues down the line.

Turning to how your systems might be monitored for security issues, we have been exploring options in the market for an affordable security managed service tailored specifically for SMEs and we believe we have found it! Our solution emphasises simplicity while utilising enterprise-grade technology to streamline daily operations effectively. Our unified platform seamlessly detects, prevents, and responds holistically to cyber threats without hassle or excessive costs.

We are offering a free trial that includes:

a. Email security.

b. Cloud data protection.

c. Automated cyber awareness training.

d. External risk assessment.

e. Endpoint security.

f. Secure browsing practices.

g. Phishing simulations.

h. Plus, as an added bonus: cyber insurance priced based on your risk score within our system—the lower your risk score, the more affordable your insurance!

This service is specifically designed for businesses with 1-250 IT users; while most SMEs typically fall between 10-15 users, we’re flexible! It’s a managed service approach with proactive risk mitigation tailored according to your preferences—all at just £12 per user per month!

We’re also introducing an intuitive cloud software solution focused on data protection that empowers organisations by securing their information while giving IT professionals an easy way to track sensitive data and manage risks effectively. The system routinely audits company data to locate sensitive information and applies necessary updates and encryption automatically.

This method ensures organisations always know what sensitive data they possess while keeping it secure through automatic encryption measures, making data security straightforward so businesses can protect private information as circumstances evolve over time, without needing complex software requiring specialised expertise.

Here are 2 very short videos explaining our solutions.

Why Your Business Needs Protective Monitoring – https://bit.ly/3Qy4u0x

Mastering GDPR Compliance: Safeguarding Your Company – https://bit.ly/4berDPa

Cyber Awareness Training

Investing in cyber awareness training is crucial, especially for SMEs who tend not to have the expertise and resource at their fingertips, to protect themselves against cyber-attacks and scams. Cyber threats are constantly evolving, and smaller businesses are often prime targets for attackers due to perceived weaker security defences. Your staff are key, they are the first line of defence, and potentially, your biggest weakness. This means they must know what the threats are and what simple steps they can take to protect the business.

Here are some key reasons why an SME should be seriously considering a cyber awareness training programme for their staff:

a. Protect Against Cyber Threats

SMEs face risks from phishing, ransomware, and social engineering attacks. Training helps employees recognise and respond to these threats before they cause harm.

b. Reduce Human Error

Most cyber incidents result from human mistakes and are not malicious in nature. Cyber awareness training can significantly reduce mistakes such as clicking on malicious links or using weak passwords. Training teaches employees what security best practice means and how to adopt it.

c. Ensure Regulatory Compliance

Many industries have data protection laws (e.g., GDPR) and other industry led regulations (PCI, FSA etc) that require businesses to safeguard customer data. Cyber awareness training helps SMEs comply with these regulations and avoid fines and reputational damage.

d. Protect Business Reputation

A data breach can damage customer trust and brand reputation, potentially leading to lost business. Proactive cybersecurity measures, including training, help maintain credibility.

e. Minimise Financial Losses

Cyber incidents can lead to financial losses from fraud, legal fees, downtime, and recovery costs. Investing in training is a cost-effective way to mitigate these risks.

f. Strengthen Overall Security Culture

When employees understand cybersecurity risks, they become an active part of the defence strategy, fostering a security-first mindset across the organisation.

g. Improve Incident Response

Trained employees can quickly identify and report security incidents, enabling faster response times and reducing potential damage.

h. Stay Competitive

Many clients and partners prefer working with businesses that prioritise cybersecurity. Demonstrating a commitment to security can be a competitive advantage.

Awareness training doesn’t need to cost that much, and it can be delivered classroom based, either on site or online, or it can be automated. The latter is often the preferred platform for an SME.

Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of each method of delivery.

Classroom-Based Training

Pros:

Interactive Learning – Employees can ask questions, engage in discussions, and get real-time feedback.
Customisable Content – Trainers can tailor content based on specific organisational threats or employee skill levels.
Higher Engagement – In-person or live virtual sessions often result in better engagement and knowledge retention.
Hands-on Practice – Allows for simulations, group exercises, and real-world case studies.

Cons:

Costly – Requires hiring trainers, scheduling sessions, and potential travel expenses.
Time-Consuming – Employees must take time away from work to attend sessions.
Scalability Issues – Difficult to train a large workforce across multiple locations.
Inconsistency – The effectiveness may vary depending on the instructor’s expertise and teaching style.

Automated Training (often AI-Based)

Pros:

Cost-Effective – No need for in-person instructors or travel costs.
Scalable – Easily deployed across an entire organisation, including remote employees.
Flexible Scheduling – Employees can complete training at their own pace.
Consistent Content Delivery – Ensures all employees receive the same training material.
Trackable Progress & Reporting – Automated platforms provide analytics on employee performance and compliance.

Cons:

Limited Engagement – Lack of real-time interaction may result in lower retention.
Generic Content – May not always address specific threats or industry-specific risks.
No Immediate Feedback – Employees may not have an opportunity to clarify doubts in real time.
Potential for Click-Through Learning – Some employees might rush through without fully absorbing the information.

Which one is better? This is somewhat subjective and will depend very much on the type of business you are, your budget and expectations. Generally:

For organisations needing high engagement and tailored content, classroom-based training is ideal.
For large, distributed teams or cost-conscious businesses, automated training is more practical.
A hybrid approach, combining both methods, often works best—using classroom sessions for deep learning and automated modules for ongoing reinforcement.

Here at H2 we can offer both classroom based, in person or on-line, as well as an automated programme which can include induction courses and continual reinforcement. This of course if the more cost effective solution for many SMEs.

Cyber Security Operations

Security operations is a complex subject and there is no doubt that it can be expensive and difficult, even for corporate organisations who generally have the resource, both financial and technical, to run a security operations centre (SOC), or at least can afford to outsource. I saw an RFP from a housing society for a SOC and I would be very interested to see if that contract gets let once the organisation gets the quotes, because I would be shocked if they could afford it.

Their RFP based its premise on the introduction of a Security Information and Event Management system (SIEM), which.in itself, might suggest that they don’t really know what they are asking for, or indeed, what they want. I base this on having designed, built and operated several such operations centres in the past.

Now before the SIEM vendors and resellers pile on, let’s be clear, SIEM systems have their place and are very useful in a SOC, although I would argue that they are most certainly not the end all and be all. My focus these days is on SMEs and for an SME there are several reasons why a SOC and an SIEM may be over the top and a cost too far.

Whilst an SIEM system is a valuable tool for cybersecurity, it comes with several drawbacks, including:

a. High Cost

Expensive Implementation – SIEM systems require significant upfront costs for software, hardware, and licensing.
Ongoing Costs – Maintenance, updates, and skilled personnel add to long-term expenses.

b. Complex Deployment and Management

Difficult Configuration – Setting up a SIEM system to work effectively requires extensive tuning and integration with various security tools.
Frequent Fine-Tuning – To avoid false positives and negatives, organisations must continuously refine alert rules and correlation policies.

c. High Volume of Alerts and False Positives

Alert Fatigue – SIEM systems generate numerous alerts, many of which are false positives, overwhelming security teams.
Difficult Prioritisation – It can be challenging to distinguish between critical threats and routine events without proper tuning.

d. Scalability Issues

Performance Bottlenecks – As an organisation grows, more logs and data sources can slow down the system.
Expensive Scaling – Scaling a SIEM to handle increasing data volumes often requires costly upgrades.

e. Need for Skilled Personnel

Expertise Required – SIEM systems need cybersecurity professionals to manage, analyse, and fine-tune them effectively.
Shortage of Talent – Finding skilled SIEM analysts can be challenging and expensive.

f. Storage and Compliance Challenges

Log Retention Costs – Storing large volumes of logs for compliance can be expensive.
Regulatory Complexity – Ensuring compliance with data protection laws (e.g., GDPR) requires careful log management.

h. Limited Threat Detection Without AI/Automation

Reactive Approach – Many traditional SIEMs rely on pre-set rules, making them less effective against new or sophisticated threats.
Lack of Automation – Without AI-driven analytics, manual investigation can be time-consuming.

Having debunked the usefulness of an SIEM system for an SME, let’s look at what an SME could do to mitigate their cyber risks.

A good cyber security strategy has always been founded upon strength in depth. Sound security architecture, good cyber awareness training, solid access control and identity management, and the ability to protectively monitor your estate for threats, vulnerabilities, and risks.

If you are not monitoring the effectiveness of the protections that you have spent good money on, how do you know it’s money well spent? Are those protections doing what you think they are? Monitoring is central to the identification and detection of threats to your IT systems. It acts as your eyes and ears when detecting and recovering from security incidents and it enables you to ensure that devices are used in accordance with your organisational policies.

Many small to medium-sized businesses struggle with stretched resources, lean budgets, and a critical technical expertise gap. This fight against sophisticated cyber threats and outdated systems turns them into easy targets for cybercriminals. Exposed and at risk, these businesses stagger on the edge of significant disruption, financial loss, and reputational damage. Although on the surface an SIEM system might seem to be what an SME needs, it would not fit the profile of most SMEs, being too resource intensive and costly.

We have been researching the market, looking for a way of providing a security managed service that would serve an SME, at an affordable price. And we think we’ve found it – no, we are SURE we have found it. Simplicity is at its core, employing enterprise-grade technology to simplify and streamline the day-to-day work. Our unified platform and onboarding process, seamlessly detects, prevents, and responds to cyber threats in the most holistic, hassle-free, and cost-effective way.

We are offering a 14 day free trial and will cover:

Email security.
Cloud data.
Automated cyber awareness training.
External risk.
Endpoint security.
Secure browsing.
Phishing simulation.
And as an added bonus we can provide cyber insurance at a price which is directly linked to your risk score within or system. The lower your risk, the cheaper the insurance.

This system is deliberately aimed at 1-250 IT users in any business. Most SMEs come in around 10 to 15 IT users, but we’re not precious about it. It is a managed service, and we have our eyes on the glass and can mitigate your risks automatically, or in concert with you, depending on how you wish to tailor the service. All this for a mere £12 per user per month.

Governance, Risk and Compliance

…. or let’s call it GRC because it is a bit of a mouthful. Two questions arise, firstly what does it mean, and secondly, does it really apply to SMEs?

To answer the first question GRC is a program that comprises those elements which, governed by the cyber-security strategy, provide cyber-security risk assessment, generate appropriate cyber-risk management policies and controls, and enable measurement of compliance with those policies and controls. Let’s not forget those controls required by regulatory compliance which are required by legal and regulatory bodies.

Governance is the process which dictates policy in line with the cyber-security strategy. Governance ensures that the organisation’s cyber-security policies are generated, adopted and amended within an organisation. Governance may be derived from both internal requirements (e.g. audit, board direction, information security) and external sources (e.g. statutory and regulatory requirements).
Risk management is the process by which risks are evaluated in light of business requirements – and the organisation’s risk tolerance or appetite. Risk management and mitigation policies and controls are then designed to achieve an acceptable level of risk to the organisation’s finances, data, reputation etc. The policies and intensity and number of the controls must be balanced against their cost and budgetary considerations, as well as the acceptable level of residual risk remaining once all controls have been implemented. Risk management is also the means by which new risks from emerging threats and new business opportunities are assessed and reduced to an acceptable level.
Compliance is the process by which adherence to risk management policies and controls are measured and gaps are identified. This function is performed by various individuals and teams, including internal audit, risk assessment teams, external regulatory agencies and third-party organizations.

OK, so far so good, but isn’t this all a little over the top for SMEs. Well yes and no. Firstly, every business must comply with the statutory regulations laid down by government and the requirements for governance laid down by various industry standards. PCI is a good example of the latter. If you don’t comply to PCI DSS standards, you simply won’t be allowed to take credit card payments. Maybe not important to all businesses, but it is to many.

Secondly, it is a matter of scale. Everyone in business does some form of risk assessment during the working day – is it safe to take this person on? Is this a good bit of business to acquire or is it too risky? Do we need to diversify? Etc. Even if your risk assessments aren’t formal and you are doing them on the fly, they are still relevant to your business. Cyber Security is no different. Your cyber assets, and in this case, we often mean your data, need to be risk assessed, ie assessing the risk to the business if it all goes pear shaped, and then the right controls applied. This falls under GRC.

So, what kills GRC in business? It’s often a lack of communication and understanding. The lack of understanding comes from not having the relevant expertise to talk to, and I’m not referring to IT techies. They are great at keeping your systems working, be they an in-house resource or a managed service IT company under contract. But they are not cyber security professionals. The latter is a skill set recognised in the industry with its own qualifications and career path.

The lack of communication comes in when you have the relevant expertise to hand, usually outsourced, but the board is simply not listening to what they are being told. So why is that? Well, a big mistake made by some cyber security people is being too technical and speaking in jargon. It doesn’t work and turns people off. When putting across an argument it must be in plain English and be business focused. Management has to see some form of ROI, even it that ROI difficult to measure, based as it probably will be on proving a negative, ie the controls are working because we haven’t been hacked, as opposed to, we haven’t been hacked so we don’t need to budget for this. Another example is talking about phishing, ransomware, hacking etc, when the business wants to hear about insider fraud and intellectual property theft.

My regular readers will be aware of my adherence to the KISS principle – Keep It Simple Stupid. So overly complex GRC tools and solutions won’t work with SMEs regardless of where they sit on the totem pole, either at the lower end of Small up to the higher end of Medium. All GRC principles must be scaled accordingly, and any practitioner used to evaluate your GRC issues must have a firm grasp of the business and apply GRC principles to support that business in a way that the management can immediately see its value. Not easy but very much doable.

When working for HP I had 2 teams, one was techie and the other, focused on GRC, was not so techie and I kept that separation as it was very important.

I am always happy to have a conversation around this subject.

IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT AND ZERO TRUST

Today is a typical January day, cold, wet and miserable. I really didn’t feel like getting out of bed but hey, not a lot of choice until I become a multi-millionaire and pay someone to get out of bed for me – I wish. I’m starting the day with a large coffee from Costa to try and kick start my creative juices and get this blog written. And no, I’m not writing it in Costa, it’s a takeaway. I’ve written several pieces on the dangers of insecure coffee shop WIFI.

Those of you who have managed to plough your way through some of my earlier stuff, will know that I am very big on user awareness training for staff at all levels, believing as I do, that it is arguably one of the quickest wins that an SME can make, to protect themselves against cybercrime. There is however a very close second, and that is identity and access management.

Before I get into that, let’s talk a bit about Zero Trust. You might have heard the term but what exactly does it mean? Zero Trust architecture is a security concept that emphasises the importance of continuous verification and strict access controls within a network environment. It operates on the principle of “trust no one” and assumes that no user or device should be inherently trusted, even if they are within the network perimeter. Instead, Zero Trust focuses on authenticating and authorising every access attempt, regardless of its source or location.

In a Zero Trust architecture, access controls are implemented based on various factors, such as user identity, device health, location, and other contextual information. This approach helps prevent lateral movement within a network, reduces the impact of potential breaches, and improves overall security posture.

Zero Trust architectures typically employ technologies such as multifactor authentication, encryption, micro-segmentation, and continuous monitoring to enforce access controls and detect anomalous behaviour. By adopting a Zero Trust mindset, organisations can enhance their security defences and better protect against modern cyber threats.

Getting back to Identity and Access Control, there is mounting evidence that the message is getting through that, although passwords are very important, they most certainly aren’t the panacea that many think they are. We can see many organisations moving to 2 factor authentication as a norm now. In fact, if you want to be accredited to Cyber Essentials or ISO 27001, it’s a requirement without which you won’t pass. A charity I volunteered for has done just that and not before time, considering the amount of personal data they are holding. But is that enough?

Compromised credentials are very high on the list of cybercrime related incidents that we see and have to deal with. Protecting these identities can be a very technical issue and advice and guidance will be needed to ensure that you are adequately covered. However it needn’t be overly expensive, neither need it be overly complicated. In fact, I’m a great believer in that the simplest solution is often the best solution. I’m an adherent of the KISS principle – Keep It Simple Stupid.

Questions to ask yourself include:

Are your user accounts configured with the minimum level of privilege they need to do their job?
If an employee needs additional privilege to carry out a one off job, how do you ensure that once it’s completed, the privilege is revoked?
What is a privileged account? Typically it’s someone who needs additional privileges as part of their daily tasks, such as adding/removing users, auditing actions, access to more secure areas of the network (finance, management data etc), etc etc. Are you limiting by policy the roles within your organisation that need privileged accounts, and are you specifying explicitly what those privileges are, by role?
Are your privileged accounts subject to greater levels of auditing and scrutiny?
Do you have a joiners and leavers process to manage active accounts?
Do you have a movers process ie employees that change roles and require different levels of access to carry out their new role, either adding or removing privilege?

Another issue that you may need to consider is any accounts that exist on your network that may be used by third party suppliers. Many companies use ‘just in time’ supply management which can require third parties to have access to their network. Another example is people like me who, when carrying out things like vulnerability assessments, may be given privileges to scan the network. Is that revoked at the end of the scan? And of course, there is the IT company you may have under contract who actively have access to your network to carry out maintenance and might actually also have a contract for controlling user privilege. Or perhaps the company you have under contract maintaining your alarms and security cameras which you didn’t know were actually using your network to connect to each other and their control room.

What about logging? What is logging? Every system has a set of logs which can be switched on or off. I often come across networks where logging has been switched off or never activated because its consider to be an overhead you can live without. Well, I disagree with that, quite vehemently. Logging helps you to determine what normal looks like. For example user profiles carry out certain functions within their role. If a user is stepping outside of that profile, you need to find out why. Is it a user who is doing something they simply didn’t realise they shouldn’t, or is it something more serious? Is it an identity that has been created or hi-jacked by a cybercriminal who has managed to gain access? Examination of these logs will help you understand that. There is of course software on the market that will be of great help with this. And of course, what do you do if you are suspicious of an activity or action by a user?

This is a big and crucial issue that deserves attention, more attention that a short blog like this can give it. So if you would like more information, we would be happy to oblige.

More on budgets

I’ve been talking recently about the relationship between IT and cyber security budgets for SMEs and I mentioned that at one time, the recommendation was that 5% of IT budgets be put aside for security. Well, that figure has gone up year on year and is now about 15%. Of course, these percentages work well in the corporate market where IT budgets can run into the millions, but in the SME world, where budgets are tiny in comparison, the percentages don’t work quite as well. After 15% of very little, is very little.

So where does that leave us? We still have to budget, failing to plan is planning to fail – how’s that for a nice bit colloquialism. Budgets are necessary. IT whether hardware or software, doesn’t stand still, it moves forward rapidly and the hardware you bought two years ago will often struggle to run some of the software upgrades, and those upgrades themselves come thick and fast.

Cyber security is no different. We have to contend not only with those software implementations, many with vulnerabilities already present, but with cyber criminals who are always pushing the boundaries. We play catch up. We always have and probably always will.

So what are we budgeting for? SMEs face several challenges in implementing adequate cybersecurity defences. These challenges arise due to resource constraints, lack of expertise, and evolving threats. Some of the biggest issues are:

Cybersecurity tools, training, and infrastructure

Inadequate funding for the above. SMEs will naturally prioritise business growth and operations over cybersecurity investments.

Lack of Expertise

SMEs often lack dedicated cybersecurity personnel or in-house IT teams. Limited access to experienced professionals makes it difficult to implement and maintain robust security measures.

In adequate or lack of cyber awareness and training

Employees may lack awareness of cybersecurity risks and become easy targets for phishing or social engineering attacks.
- Insufficient training on best practices, like identifying suspicious emails or handling sensitive data securely.

Underestimation of Risks

Many SMEs believe they are too small to be targeted, making them complacent.
- Attackers often target SMEs precisely because they assume SMEs are less secure than larger companies.

Rapidly Evolving Threat Landscape

Cyber threats like ransomware, phishing, and zero-day exploits are constantly evolving.
- SMEs struggle to stay updated with new technologies and threats.

Outdated Technology

Reliance on legacy systems or software that lacks regular updates or patches.
- Limited investment in modern security tools, such as firewalls, endpoint protection, or intrusion detection systems.

Third-Party Risks

SMEs often rely on third-party vendors or service providers, which can introduce vulnerabilities. Don’t assume that your IT vendor has a grip on security – they are often as ill-informed as you are.
- A breach in one partner’s system can cascade down to the SME.

Compliance Challenges

SMEs may not have the resources to understand or comply with cybersecurity regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA, PCI DSS).
- Non-compliance can result in fines or penalties, exacerbating financial pressures.

Insufficient Incident Response Plans

SMEs often lack a formal incident response plan to handle breaches or attacks.
- Without predefined protocols, responses to incidents are slower and less effective.

Shadow IT

Employees may use unauthorised software or devices without IT approval, creating vulnerabilities.
- Shadow IT can bypass existing security measures.

Supply Chain Attacks

Cybercriminals target SMEs as an entry point to larger companies in their supply chain.
- SMEs often lack robust controls to mitigate supply chain risks.

Difficulty in Accessing Cyber Insurance

Obtaining cybersecurity insurance can be difficult or expensive for SMEs, especially if they lack basic protections.
- Insurers often require proof of a certain level of security maturity.

These days addressing these challenges requires SMEs to adopt a combination of cost-effective solutions, such as managed security services, regular training, and leveraging cloud-based security tools. Effective cyber security is a business issue, not an IT issue and requires a thorough understanding of the risks, vulnerabilities and threats, that a business faces. It requires a professional approach from a security professional that most SMEs can’t afford to employ, so the next best thing is to partner up with such an organisation.

H2 provides affordable and flexible one-off and ongoing data protection and cyber risk protection services designed specifically for SMEs; at a price they can afford. Our advice and guidance takes a unique look at the problems facing SMEs whilst calling on our vast experience working for the larger organisations and government departments.

The latest cyber security news for UK Businesses