Security Tools Archives - H2 Cyber Security for SMEs

Remote Working and Encryption

This is a subject that I tend to jump on every so often, because it’s one that people just don’t seem to get. Whether it’s working from home, from a coffee shop, airport, railway station etc, there is this perception that it’s safe because you’re connected via VPN, or perhaps some other form of application which encrypts data in transit. Well, let’s explore this subject a bit further.

There is no doubt that the propensity for working from home, or other remote locations, since COVID has introduced some very difficult, or at least challenging, security vulnerabilities into your network. For instance, prior to the pandemic, when you were 100% office based (except perhaps some mobile salespeople), your local IT provider will have almost certainly set up what we called the bastion security model. Ie, like a castle, a bastion, you had a wall around you, and for belt and braces, you also had a moat. The gateway was robust, had a drawbridge and portcullis, or let’s call it a secure firewall and anti-malware system. Everything was locked up inside and nice and secure (in fact it probably wasn’t but that’s for another day).

Whilst Microsoft didn’t invent the term the ‘new normal’, they were the first, I believe, to apply it to IT, following the enforced change in working practices brought about by the pandemic. Many companies have embraced this new normal and have settled into some form of hybrid working. Of course, this is nothing new, it’s been ‘a thing’ for years now, certainly regarding corporate organisations. The real change came about in SMEs for whom it really was quite revolutionary. Corporate bodies will have spent a lot of money on a variety or remote access systems to keep their data secure, whilst SMEs not only had to rush unprepared because of the pandemic, but they simply didn’t have the budget to employ more secure connections.

What the pandemic has done is change that, or perhaps arguably, accelerated the change to a more distributed way of working, already underway in corporate organisations but now common amongst SMEs. What does that mean for us? Firstly, we have to re-think how we are going to work. We start from a position where we still have preexisting tech, such as VPNs and whole disk encryption, to tackle modern and evolving issues.

So, what about VPNs? What are they? A VPN, or Virtual Private Network, is a service that creates a secure, encrypted connection between your device and the internet. This private “tunnel” protects your data and hides your IP address, effectively masking your online identity and activity. It works by allowing you to connect to the internet via an encrypted tunnel to a VPN server, which then forwards your requests to the website or service you’re accessing. The benefits are that it protects your data from being accessed by hackers or eavesdroppers, especially on public WIFI. It masks your IP address and replaces it with one from the VPN server, so it’s harder for websites, advertisers, or even your ISP (Internet Service Provider) to track your online activity. It’s particularly useful when working from insecure public WIFI but should also be used when working from home.

VPNs are available as standalone apps and more often now, incorporated into other applications, particularly those used to connect to cloud services.

All good, right? Well yes, anything that helps secure your data is a good thing. But like all good things it has some downsides. A VPN does help protect data in transit over an insecure WIFI connection by encrypting the data you send and receive over the internet. This means that if you’re connected to an insecure WIFI network (like in a coffee shop or airport), the VPN will prevent anyone from intercepting and reading your internet traffic.

However, a VPN does not protect data stored locally on your laptop. Files or personal information saved directly on your hard drive are not protected by the VPN. To secure the data on your laptop, you may want to consider using additional protections such as some sort of full disk encryption (BitLocker for Windows or FileVault for macOS are standard with the operating systems) to protect data at rest. And you should be using strong passwords and multi-factor authentication.

So, what I’m saying here is that should someone manage to gain access to your end point ie your laptop, desktop, even your phone, then your VPN is not going to protect you.

Let’s now talk a bit more about Bitlocker and FileVault. BitLocker, Microsoft’s disk encryption tool, provides robust security when configured properly (but I make the point here that it’s often not only incorrectly configured but isn’t even in use, making it pointless). And, like all encryption systems, its security depends on several factors, including the version of BitLocker, implementation practices, and potential vulnerabilities in the system environment. Bitlocker uses strong encryption, either AES 128 or 256 Bit, both of which are considered secure.

FileVault is the MacOS equivalent of Bitlocker (roughly) and is considered secure and built into the MacOS and is very easy to switch on. It too offers full disk encryption using AES 128 or 256 Bit. Once again though it is often not in use by Mac users, many of whom don’t even know it exists.

Are there any drawbacks to whole disk encryption? Will it protect me against things like ransomware? Whole disk encryption is designed to secure data at rest by preventing unauthorised access to data on a physical storage device (e.g., in case the device is lost or stolen). The problem is that once the machine is booted up, using the correct authentication, the disk is unencrypted, allowing you access to the data. So, the answer to the specific question re ransomware is that such an attack is typically not mitigated by this kind of encryption because:

Ransomware Operates at the OS Level: Once a device is booted up and the encrypted disk is unlocked (usually via user login), ransomware can interact with files just like any other software. Since the operating system has access to the data, the ransomware does as well.

Ransomware Encrypts Data Independently: Ransomware generally works by encrypting the contents of individual files or directories (not the entire disk), effectively “locking” them within the already-decrypted environment. BitLocker, or any full disk encryption, won’t stop ransomware from doing this, as it doesn’t interfere with file operations once the system is unlocked.

No Version Control or Rollback: Whole disk encryption solutions don’t provide a way to revert to previous file versions or recover from ransomware encryption. This is where regular backups (stored separately from the network) play a critical role in protecting against ransomware.

You’re being careful, you have a VPN, and you have Bitlocker configured on your laptop. You’re feeling nice and secure and have no issues using the local Coffee Shop or your home WIFI. Your connection to your cloud service is secure and all your data in transit is encrypted. Even your email is going via a secure tunnel. All is good with the world. Except of course that as soon as you logged on your whole disk encryption is switched off and your data is vulnerable even before you transmit it. Any data you download to work on likewise becomes vulnerable as soon as it lands on your laptop.

Earlier I argued that VPNs were old tech being used to combat modern threats and a different way of working. Does that mean that I think the VPN is no longer useful and is going out of style. No of course not, VPNs have a very real place in our security architectures and that won’t go away anytime soon. But they, like the vulnerabilities they are trying to mitigate, have to evolve and keep pace with present day and future realities.

VPNs, whether stand alone, or incorporated into another technology are great at securing data in transit. What about your data at rest? The best VPN in the world won’t protect you from someone who is determined to get in and steal your data or install ransomware. The problem for SMEs is the same that it pretty much always has been. Cost. Can they afford a system that will protect their data and stop it being lost, stolen or ransomed.

What has long been needed is a simple, flexible and intuitive security solution. We believe we have found such a system that protects your company against all known threats, and puts you firmly in control of your data, working automatically 24/7 to identify and safeguard your sensitive information.

Delivering multi-level protection, it provides real time control over all sensitive data. You can identify and solve every problem with a single click of your mouse! Instead of whole disk encryption, which is decrypted as soon as you log on, it provides file level encryption which allows authorised users access but no one else. But it does more, it locates all your data, allows you to decide what is, and what is not, sensitive, and provides subscription pricing for a fully managed solution.

It’s a system that is designed specifically for SMEs and is therefore appropriate to you, and affordable. To prove that we offer a 30-day free trial so that you can see it for yourself. Check it out at https://hah2.co.uk/gdpr-data-protection/.

Is Protective Monitoring Necessary for an SME?

I’ve talked about protective monitoring in the past but there is still some misperceptions about it, particularly amongst SMEs. Probably first and foremost is that it is way too expensive, which leads to thinking that it’s not for them and is much more of a nice to have than a necessity. I thought I’d take a bit of a deeper dive into this.

So, what is it?

Protective monitoring in cyber defence is a systematic approach to continuously observing and analysing an organisation’s digital environment to detect, prevent, and respond to security threats. It involves gathering and analysing data about network traffic, system activity, and user behaviours to identify potential vulnerabilities or malicious activities. Here’s a breakdown of its key components and purposes:

For a small or medium-sized enterprise (SME), implementing cyber protective monitoring is crucial for a variety of reasons. This proactive approach can be the difference between quickly identifying and mitigating threats or facing significant damage from a cyber-attack. Here are key reasons why SMEs should consider cyber protective monitoring:

1. Protection Against Data Breaches

SMEs often hold sensitive data like customer information, financial records, and intellectual property. Companies like law firms, financial advisors and estate agents, will hold years worth of personal identifiable information as defined by the Data Protection Act, or UK GDPR if you prefer. Protective monitoring helps identify unusual activity within their network, such as unauthorised access or data exfiltration attempts, allowing for swift action to prevent breaches.

This is especially important as SMEs can be perceived as easier targets by cybercriminals compared to larger enterprises with more robust defences.

2. Regulatory Compliance

Many industries have strict regulations around data privacy and cybersecurity, such as GDPR and PCI-DSS. Protective monitoring helps SMEs stay compliant by providing visibility into how data is accessed, used, and secured.

It allows them to maintain audit trails of activity, which are often required to prove compliance during an audit or investigation.

3. Early Threat Detection

Cyber threats are constantly evolving, and attackers are often inside a network for days or weeks before launching an attack (such as ransomware). Protective monitoring enables the detection of anomalous behaviour that could indicate a security threat before it becomes critical.

This helps minimise damage by enabling a faster response to potential threats like malware infections, unauthorized access, or network vulnerabilities.

4. Cost-Effectiveness in the Long Run

While some SMEs may view cyber protective monitoring as an additional cost, it is often more cost-effective than dealing with the fallout of a cyber-attack. The financial impact of a breach includes legal fees, loss of business, damage to reputation, and potential fines from regulatory bodies.

By investing in monitoring, SMEs can save significantly on these potential costs, making it a smart investment, especially now that there are systems specifically designed and costed for SMEs.

5. Building Trust with Clients and Partners

Customers and business partners expect their data to be handled securely. An SME with strong cybersecurity practices, including protective monitoring, can build trust and demonstrate its commitment to data security.

This can serve as a competitive advantage, especially when dealing with larger enterprises or industries that prioritise security.

6. Rapid Incident Response

When a security incident occurs, the speed of the response is critical. Cyber protective monitoring provides real-time alerts when suspicious activities are detected, enabling SMEs to quickly isolate affected systems and take necessary actions.

A rapid response can help contain potential damage, maintain business continuity, and limit operational disruptions.

7. Mitigating Insider Threats

Not all cybersecurity risks come from outside the organisation. Insider threats, whether malicious or accidental, can cause significant damage. Protective monitoring can help detect unusual behaviour from employees or contractors, such as unauthorised access to sensitive data or suspicious data transfers.

This allows SMEs to address these issues before they lead to data leaks or other security incidents.

8. Scalability and Adaptability

As SMEs grow, their digital footprint and potential vulnerabilities expand as well. Cyber protective monitoring solutions can scale alongside the business, ensuring that security measures remain effective even as new systems, networks, and applications are added.

This adaptability makes it easier for SMEs to adjust their cybersecurity strategy as their needs change, without a complete overhaul of their security infrastructure.

9. Insights for Better Decision-Making

Beyond just identifying threats, protective monitoring can provide valuable insights into network usage and performance. SMEs can leverage this data to make better strategic decisions regarding their IT infrastructure, such as identifying redundant systems or optimising network resources.

It can also highlight areas that require further security investments, helping prioritise spending on cybersecurity.

10. Improving Overall Cybersecurity Posture

Cyber protective monitoring is a key part of a broader cybersecurity strategy. By continuously monitoring and analysing network activities, SMEs can better understand their vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.

This helps create a culture of security within the organisation, where cybersecurity is not just an afterthought but an ongoing priority.

Overall, cyber protective monitoring provides visibility, control, and peace of mind for SMEs, helping them navigate the complex and ever-changing landscape of cyber threats. By taking a proactive stance, they can protect their assets, maintain customer trust, and ensure long-term resilience against cyber-attacks.

Protective monitoring is not just for corporate organisations, but is for everyone, especially now that there are systems and services designed especially for SMEs and priced accordingly. Don’t leave it until it’s too late. Playing catch up and fixing problems after the event, is always much more expensive that taking a pro-active stance.

To learn more about the protective monitoring managed solutions we provide please click here https://www.hah2.co.uk/

Can Remote Working be Dangerous?

Well frankly, yes it can be dangerous. There is a myriad of issues which have sprung out of remote working since COVID, with many SMEs, now operating a hybrid working scenario, although in my experience, certainly amongst my customer base, there are very few going 100% remote.

Businesses of all sizes have been forced to transform their operations to support remote work and by and large have done well, but not without many challenges—including video conferencing burn out, (along with wishing they’d taken out shares in Zoom!!), and a yearning to work together in person again, someday. We all realise that group working, face to face, is often necessary not just for efficiency, but because we are social animals. Experience has taught many businesses many things, but strangely, to my mind at least, many have simply not grasped the potentially dire consequences in terms of cyber security and data protection.

A distributed work environment i.e., personnel spread around various locations, office, home working, even the local coffee shop, creates critical challenges and new security threats as a result. The speed with which this has happened has meant that many simply did not take this into account and if they did, thought, well, this is temporary, and it won’t matter in the long run. Well perhaps, but as many are now finding, there have been advantages to home working, not least a lowering of costs in terms of how much office space is needed to carry out the business function. Many are now looking at Hybrid working i.e., from home with a day or two in the office during the week. There are pros and cons to this outside of the scope of this article, and businesses will have to make their own judgements, but one thing is clear and that is that businesses need to understand the risks now inherent in distributed work and need to get better at cyber security and data protection, in those environments.

Employees when remote working, are at much greater risk than those in offices. Since home connections are less secure, cybercriminals have an easier entry into the company network. Furthermore, the explosion of various online tools, solutions, and services for collaboration and productivity tend to have the bare minimum of security default setting, and updates from third-party vendors can change security preferences and be easily overlooked.

Phishing becomes an even greater threat to home workers simply because, in an office environment, they have access to colleagues and managers, who they can approach for advice and guidance. This is much harder to replicate with remote workers, especially those who may not be particularly tech savvy and who may not wish to become ‘burdensome’ to their co-workers.

Ransomware also enjoys an advantage in the remote working model. If their connection to the company is blocked, it is more difficult for workers to get assistance from the right experts and authorities. And since trust levels are lower when working from home, some workers will be concerned that they have “done something wrong” and so may be more reluctant to seek help. While this risk can be addressed by increased training, as well as messaging that vigilance and involving corporate IT will be rewarded, it can still be an uphill battle.

One of the biggest dangers I still see day to day is the dangers inherent in working from the local coffee shop. This is a subject that I tend to jump on every so often, because it’s one that people just don’t seem to get. Whenever I drop into a coffee shop for my caffeine infusion, there are usually at least a couple of people with their laptops open, working away on business issues. I could see open spreadsheets (and easy to read if you were sitting behind them), and all have their email open. They are often on a video call, and I can often hear all their side of the conversation, annoying enough for other café users but they are oblivious of the data being released into the wild.

If you are among those free Wi-Fi lovers, there’s bad news for you… your online privacy and security is at risk, if you rely on the weak to non-existent Wi-Fi security protocolsat coffee shops. This means that you could be exposed to various threats such as identity theft which has over 15 million cases each year, data theft/breaches, introducing malware to your business network and that of your customers/suppliers. This list is not exhaustive.

Free or public Wi-Fi’s are hotspots for hackers and data snoopers who want to steal your private data or financial information. It is easy for hackers to do that nowadays. You will be surprised to know the different ways hackers can compromise your device or your private information and why you shouldn’t rely on Wi-Fi security at coffee shops as they come with a lot of risk.

Unencrypted Data Exposure: If the Wi-Fi network is not encrypted, your sensitive information (e.g., passwords, emails, and financial data) can be intercepted by hackers using packet-sniffing tools.

Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Hackers can position themselves between you and the network, intercepting and potentially altering the communication between your device and the server, leading to data theft or manipulation.

Fake Hotspots (Evil Twin Attacks): Cybercriminals may create a rogue Wi-Fi network that mimics the coffee shop’s legitimate network. If you connect to it, they can access all the data transmitted over the connection.

Malware Injection: Open networks can allow hackers to inject malware or viruses onto your device, which can lead to long-term breaches of your data or systems.

Session Hijacking: Attackers can intercept your session cookies, giving them access to your accounts, even if you’re using secure websites.

To mitigate these risks, use a VPN, avoid sensitive transactions, and ensure your firewall and antivirus software are active. Although a VPN may not save your data if it’s stored on your laptop.

We are huge supporters of Cyber Awareness training for managers and staff, arguing that this is no longer a ‘nice to have’ and is now very much a necessity. In fact, it is arguably the biggest quick win, giving the greatest potential return on investment that there is. Of course, this means that companies must understand what their threats, vulnerabilities and risks are, to assess exactly what training is going to be the most effective.

But that alone won’t save you from a dedicated hacker. We need to look at some more technical solutions to help you beat attacks. Here at H2 we have researched and developed services using Software as a Service (SaaS), which, being cloud based, work wherever you are, office, home or coffee shop, and encrypts your most sensitive data whether on your machine, or in transit.

If you feel a no obligation chat about this would be helpful, give us a call.

How are Mid-Market Businesses Faring Regarding Cyber Security

Mid-sized businesses are under as much pressure to keep the organisation secure as are the larger corporates but without the deep pockets that those larger corporates have. Because of this they are also fast becoming the easy target that we often view small businesses as being, but with a larger payload for the cyber-criminal. In fact, in 2023, 59% of medium sized businesses suffered a cyber-attack or data breach in the UK.

The biggest issue facing mid-market organisations is balancing limited resources with the growing complexity and volume of cyber threats. The lack of resources is compounded by an overall dearth of cyber-security skills in general, and a real lack of skills in mid-sized companies and the IT companies they often outsource to. Key aspects of this challenge include:

1. Resource Constraints: Mid-market organisations typically lack the budget and personnel to implement robust, enterprise-level cyber-security solutions. They may not have dedicated security teams, forcing IT departments to manage cyber-security alongside other duties. This dilutes skills and leaves them vulnerable to sophisticated attacks.

2. Rising Threat Sophistication: Cyber-criminals are increasingly using advanced tools and techniques, such as ransomware, phishing, and supply chain attacks, now enhanced with AI, which often outpace the security capabilities of mid-sized businesses. These organisations are prime targets because they are often seen as less protected than larger enterprises but more valuable than small businesses.

3. Compliance and Regulatory Challenges: As regulations like GDPR, FCA, and industry specific mandates grow, mid-market companies struggle to meet compliance requirements without the same level of support and infrastructure that larger organisations can afford.

4. Lack of Cyber security Awareness: Employees at mid-market organisations may not have adequate training on cyber-security best practices, making them vulnerable to human error, such as falling for phishing scams or weak password practices.

5. Third-Party Risks: Mid-market companies often rely on third-party vendors for various services, but they may lack the resources to thoroughly vet these vendors’ security postures, leading to vulnerabilities in their supply chain.

Addressing these issues requires mid-market organisations to prioritise cyber-security despite resource constraints, invest in scalable security solutions, and foster a strong security culture throughout the organisation.

There is a very real difficulty in breaking out of this cycle. The mind set of most board members is to focus on the core business and keep costs to an absolute minimum. Costs are important in a mid-sized business, especially one where margins may be tight. IT budgets will focus on items, both hardware and software, that are required to keep the revenue flowing and its cyber-security solutions, including data protection solutions, are often seen as nebulous because there is no obvious return on investment. CIOs/CISOs/IT Directors are often left trying to prove a negative, ie we haven’t had any security issues because we have protections in place, as opposed to we haven’t had any security issues therefore we don’t need to budget for protections. It’s a years old argument that never seems to have a resolution.

However, breaking out of this cycle, this thought process, is very important. Cyber threats, what we refer to as the threat landscape, are evolving at a frightening pace, often enhanced using AI. This will further compound any argument about budget simply because there is this need to keep pace with the cyber-criminal, and those of us in this industry know that we have always been playing catch up.

So how do we do it? Not an easy answer but one way that some mid-sized organisations are now looking at is managed security solutions. The provision of SOC (Security Operations Centre) solutions, in a shared way, as we do with cloud services for example, makes managed security more affordable. Many of the large enterprise organisations also make use of managed security solutions for the reasons of cost. On site solutions are not just expensive in terms of hardware and software, but also staffing costs, training etc, can be exorbitant. So, sharing those costs becomes very attractive.

Of course, there is no one size fits all solution and most managed service providers will have a set of services it provides, and do not tailor their services simply because it would make them too complex and expensive to provide, somewhat obviating the whole reason for doing it in the first place.

To make sure that you have the level of protection that you need, then you must do some up front work, maybe getting some consultancy that will save you money in the long run, by getting the protections and levels of service in place that you actually need.

There are several solutions around and organisations that provide them, and I do recommend that you shop around. Some are better than others and the CrowdStrike issue hasn’t done the reputation of managed services much good. Here at H2 we offer solutions for both monitoring your technical estate, your user actions, email, cloud services etc, as well as your data protection issues providing monitoring of any compliances that you may need, including UK GDPR, PCI DSS as an example.

If in doubt give us call, we’d be delighted to chat it over, offer a demo and a FREE trial lasting up to 30 days for the data protection solutions and 14 days for the more technical solution.

Is Cyber Security about Tech or the Business?

It’s simply a fact that many owners, managers, directors etc, believe that cyber security is a technology issue and is best left to those guys in IT who understand that stuff. Here at H2 we spend a lot of time and effort trying to educate C level people, that it really is a business issue, although it has significant input from the techies. It’s a business issue because breaches can have a significant financial and reputational impact. It’s also an IT issue because it involves implementing technical measures to protect systems and data. Effective cyber security requires a collaboration between business leaders and IT professionals to address both the strategic and technical aspects of security.

The crux of the issue though, is that it must be led by the business, and at board level. It requires a strategy to be followed, which is laid down at board level and which is focused on the goals and aspirations of the business, especially when your IT is outsourced. You can outsource your IT, but you can’t outsource your responsibility.

A valid argument is that the proliferation of security tools creates an illusion of safety. Organisations, large and small, often believe that by deploying a firewall, antivirus software and maybe some other tools, such as intrusion detection systems, they are adequately protected. This ignores the fact that such tools are controls put in place to mitigate risks identified and qualified in terms of importance, in a risk assessment and unless the benefits they bring are properly identified, and the solutions placed and configured correctly, they may well not be doing what you think they are doing. This thinking can also introduce significant third-party risks into your domain. The most recent example of this is the CrowdStrike issue which caused so much chaos throughout the globe.

To be fair to most companies in the smaller and mid-market arenas, their focus is on obtaining IT solutions as cost effectively as possible, and with the minimum of support costs. Cost control is vital to most. This means that they are extremely reluctant to spend money on what they see as not being part of their core business. Of course, if they get a cyber-attack or scam, or worse a data breach attracting the attention of the ICO, then their costs trying to fix the issue can easily outstrip any costs in prevention. Unless they have a well thought out risk managed strategy, they are wide open to slick sales pitches which push products. The rub is that in order to have that well thought out strategy, it means spending on what they see as expensive services that can seem somewhat nebulous, not something they can see and feel, and there is that vague feeling that they are being led to do something that really isn’t all that important.

The approach most take is to trust their IT provider to give them the protections they need. Most of these IT providers are what is known as re-sellers, ie they sell other people’s products and will push those products because that’s their business model. What they won’t do is take a risk managed approach which is essential in ensuring that any limited spend on security, limited because of cost constraints, is targeted where it’s needed and will be most effective. In other words, the technological approach taken by most IT support company’s will do half a job at best.

In essence then, if you don’t understand the risks you face, how can ensure that your cyber security strategy and protections are fit for purpose? Risk management is all about helping us to create plans for our future in a deliberate and responsible way. This requires us to explore what could go wrong in an organisation, on a day-to-day basis.

A quote from Bruce Schneier, Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School, goes like this:

‘If you think technology can solve your security problems, then you don’t understand the problems and you don’t understand the technology’.

How do we approach this then? First and foremost, you need to identify the risks that you face. How can you identify that risk and then mitigate it? Taking risks is a part of business. You assess risk every day when doing business. Do you want to do this deal? What happens if it goes not as expected? Do I want to take this person on? Whether you formally undertake a risk assessment or whether you assess that risk informally, you are working out what is appropriate to a level that is consistent with the risk that your organisation is prepared to take. Failure to do that will almost certainly be damaging to your business, perhaps fatally so.

The difference between assessing day to day business risk and assessing risk to cyber assets, is one of understanding. What is a cyber asset? In this context insert the word ‘information’ instead of cyber. It is the information contained within the IT system that is the important asset, not the piece of hardware it is sitting on. You understand your business risk, after all it is your business, but do you understand information risk? Do you have a clear idea of what information assets you have and where they are? Before you answer that think it through. Do you really know where all the data is? OK, you know that you have a server or servers probably in a cloud somewhere (cloud storage and access is a whole other subject) and that somewhere in those servers there is a bunch of data which runs your business. How much of that data has been saved onto staff workstations when they needed it to carry out some work? How much has been copied off somewhere else for what was probably a very good reason at one point? How well is your firewall functioning? Can malware work its way onto the network because the firewall does not have Universal Threat Management installed and can therefore be probing the servers and workstations. And we haven’t even thought about changes in working patterns. How many of your staff now work remotely some or all of the time. I could go on.

How can we be sure where all this information is and how important each bit is to the business? How can we assess this risk to the business, if information is lost or otherwise compromised? What about ransomware, phishing scams etc? The good news is that some of this can now be automated and managed for you at an affordable price and you can even arrange a 14 day totally free trial to assess its effectiveness.

New Cyber Threats and Innovations

Cybersecurity is an ever-evolving field, with new threats and innovations emerging regularly. Not all these threats will apply to everyone, the trick is, and has always been, identifying the threats that apply to you, working out how vulnerable you are too those threats, and applying controls to bring those down to an acceptable level. That acceptable level will change, not just from company to company, but also asset to asset. Don’t waste valuable time and energy trying to achieve a zero-threat level. It doesn’t exist. You need to understand clearly what your appetite for risk is, ie what is an acceptable level of risk for you, and then go for it.

But what emerging threats are there that you just might have to combat in your daily business life. These trends highlight the ongoing innovation in both cyber threats and defences, driven by the growing reliance on digital infrastructure and the rapid evolution of technology.

Here are some suggestions and trends in cybersecurity as of late 2024:

1. AI-Powered Cyber Attacks and Defences

Threats: Cybercriminals are increasingly using AI to launch more sophisticated attacks, such as AI-driven phishing campaigns, automated hacking attempts, and machine learning-based malware that adapts to security measures. We’re seeing AI powered social engineering, phone calls mimicking voices of managers, and similar. Like with just about all AI usage, what it does it make things much easier by reducing human effort. So, attacks can be set up using AI and become almost fire and forget, just letting it get on with it in the background.

Defense: Organisations are countering this with AI-based threat detection systems, anomaly detection, and predictive analytics to identify potential breaches before they occur. What about your defences? Are they keeping up with these types of threat. What about mobile workforces, are your staff covered once they leave the office; do you have a hybrid or even fully remote workforce? If so, are your defences up to the job? Check out https://hah2.co.uk/

2. Ransomware Evolution

Ransomware continues to be a major threat, but it’s evolving with more advanced encryption techniques, and multi-stage attacks where attackers exfiltrate data before encrypting it. They then threaten to publish the stolen data unless a ransom is paid. I recently heard of a company that had been infiltrated through its website which was transactional, ie it sold stuff via the website and the website was connected to their database of products and sales order processing system. The web developer didn’t have sufficiently robust security in place. A good example of an SME being exploited via their supply chain.

Double extortion and Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) have become more common, where hackers sell ransomware kits to other criminals.

3. Zero Trust Architecture

Zero Trust has moved from a buzzword to a mainstream security model. Organisations are adopting a “never trust, always verify” approach, assuming that every user and device, both inside and outside the network, could be compromised.

Implementing least privilege access, micro-segmentation, and continuous authentication are key features of this approach. And no, this doesn’t have to be cost prohibitive.

4. Supply Chain Attacks

Attacks targeting third-party vendors and software providers have increased. By compromising trusted suppliers, attackers can infiltrate many organisations through a single breach.

Notable Examples: The SolarWinds and Kaseya attacks were significant instances that highlighted the dangers of such supply chain vulnerabilities. The attack on the NHS via a contracted service provider, is also a good example but it doesn’t just affect the big organisations. See above for an example of how an SME was attacked via a third-party web designer.

5. Post-Quantum Cryptography

With quantum computing on the horizon, there’s increasing focus on developing encryption algorithms that can resist quantum attacks. Post-quantum cryptography is becoming a hot topic as organisations prepare for the future of computing.

Even without quantum computing, many organisations do not use encryption, even for their critical data. If you are subject to a data breach, but that data is encrypted, you could save yourself a lot of money and reputational damage.

6. Cloud Security and Misconfiguration

As cloud adoption accelerates, the security of cloud environments remains a top concern. Misconfigured cloud settings continue to expose sensitive data, while cloud-native security solutions (e.g., CSPM, CWPP) are becoming more prevalent.

Securing multi-cloud environments and addressing shared responsibility models are critical challenges.

7. Cybersecurity for IoT and OT

The Internet of Things (IoT) and Operational Technology (OT) are becoming frequent attack targets. Securing connected devices, industrial systems, and critical infrastructure from cyber threats is a growing concern, especially as they are often lacking in adequate security protocols.

This is becoming more critical as home working becomes more and more popular. Employees connecting to your company cloud and systems using home broadband and WIFI, are also de fact connecting to any IOT devices that they are using in the home, potentially opening up back doors into your system.

8. Data Privacy Regulations and Compliance

Data privacy is a key focus as more countries introduce stricter regulations like the Data Protection Act 2018, now becoming known as UK GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation). There are other compliances such as FSA regulations and other industry bodies, that many need adherence to. Data breaches can produce fines from regulatory bodies, law suites from those affected, and quite severe reputational damage.

9. Cybersecurity Automation and SOAR

Automation is becoming critical in cybersecurity due to the sheer volume of threats. Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) tools help streamline incident detection and response, freeing up analysts to focus on complex tasks.

Do you have anything in place to automate your defences? Do you monitor your systems for threats?

10. Identity and Access Management (IAM)

Identity theft and credential stuffing attacks are rising, making IAM solutions more important than ever. Multi-factor authentication (MFA), password less authentication, and biometrics are seeing widespread adoption to prevent unauthorised access.

Are we failing in our cyber resilience?

The fallout from the CloudStrike sensor failure, which caused severe outages throughout the globe, is still being felt and will be felt for some time to come. The emphasis has been on recovery but that will start to change, as we focus more on why it happened, and what can be done to mitigate further failures of this kind. I’ve said already, in a piece I wrote last week (https://hah2.co.uk/you-can-outsource-your-it-but-you-cant-outsource-your-responsibility/ ), that we appear to be becoming too reliant on our IT providers, particularly managed services, to ensure that we remain safe and our services can continue, and we aren’t looking too hard at ensuring resilience is built into our systems. It begs the question, is business continuity planning no longer in fashion.

Alexander Rogan of Abatis also wrote a piece that’s worth reading (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/billions-lost-chaos-lessons-from-crowdstrike-microsoft-rogan-abxde/}. In his article Alexander emphasises the importance of zero trust architecture and processes. What this essentially means is that we cannot afford to trust anyone other than ourselves. Suppliers are there to help and as such they should ensure that their own processes are robust and include thorough pre-production testing, controlled roll outs and good baseline security measures. Where CrowdStrike falls in this regard, will I’m sure, get thoroughly tested in the not too distant future.

The UK Government is also questioning the resilience of business in the UK to cyber threats (https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jul/29/uk-desperately-exposed-to-cyber-threats-and-pandemics-says-minister), and in this case a cyber threat is not necessarily confined to security, it can also mean a crash due to a technical or process failure.

In the cyber security industry, there has long been a running war between those that sell products and those of us concerned more with services. Having been in the industry for 30 years, I have seen this time and again and the product sales nearly always win. Why? Simply because services are a hard sell with a long timeline whereas product sales are easier and quicker to achieve. Why would that be? Again, simple, people like to be able to quickly demonstrate a return on investment. They like to see a product, doing its stuff, even when often, they don’t realise how it’s doing what it’s doing, or if it’s the right product in the right place at the right time.

The risk managed approach is the way to go every time. That has not changed at all in the 30 years I’ve been plugging away at it. It’s all about People, Process and then Technology. I often quote Bruce Schneier, a US scientist on the Harvard Faculty, and a thought leader in this space. He says, ‘If you think technology can solve your security problems, then you don’t understand the problems and you don’t understand the technology’. Breaking this down, what he’s getting at is that first and foremost, you must understand the risks that you face and to do that, you have to identify your cyber assets. By that we don’t mean hardware and even software, what we are talking about is your data and the ability to keep your systems online and accessing what your staff and/or customers need to access, when they need to access it. Once you identify your assets, you then need to identify the threats to those assets and how vulnerable you are too those threats. Threat and vulnerability = risk. And by that we mean the risk to the business if it all goes pear shaped.

Once that’s done, we can then allocate a risk score to each asset with the aim of managing that risk down to an acceptable level, known as the risk appetite. That will change business to business, even asset to asset. You wouldn’t for example allocate the same level of risk [to the business], to a revenue earning system, as you would to perhaps a purely admin system that contains no personal data.

This all sounds terribly difficult and expensive, and that’s why many companies simply don’t do it, or maybe they do a subset of it. But unless you do, then it can be very difficult to know for sure that you are spending your limited budget on the right protections, in the right place. In the long run, it can save you a lot of money. This same assessment applies equally to the CrowdStrike problem, or for that matter, any other company that you have in your supply chain. You need to assess what damage they could do to you if they fail, and what you can do to mitigate that damage. It’s very well and good reaching for the nearest lawyer when it’s all gone to hell, how much better to stop it, or mitigate it, before you get there.

You can outsource your IT, but you can’t outsource your responsibility

It’s hard to look anywhere without seeing reference to the CloudStrike/Microsoft disaster that is still causing issues around the globe. There is plenty of plaudits for the way that both CloudStrike and Microsoft have handled the fall out and remediation (https://www.crowdstrike.com/falcon-content-update-remediation-and-guidance-hub/) but you can’t escape the conclusion that it shouldn’t have happened in the first place. Something clearly went wrong in the processes either in place, or worse, not in place, to make sure that software releases are thoroughly tested before release. I also read somewhere that there had been a previous problem with CloudStrike software releases which affected at least 2 versions of Linux, but that this went largely unnoticed. I suppose the predominance of Windows machines in the marketplace would make it impossible to hide a problem of this magnitude.

All that said, what is clear is that there was nothing that an organisation using this application, could have done themselves to prevent it, neither could most disaster recovery plans have dealt with this successfully. The remediation has to come from both CloudStrike and Microsoft, which it is.

I wrote a piece recently which included the difference between disaster recovery and business continuity planning (https://hah2.co.uk/what-are-the-questions-business-owners-ask-when-considering-cyber-security/). Disaster Recovery focuses specifically on restoring IT infrastructure and data after a disaster has occurred, and as already pointed out, in this case that fix has to come from outside the affected organisations and there was very little they could do.

Business Continuity refers to the proactive strategies and plans put in place to ensure that essential business functions can continue in the event of a disruption or disaster. This where organisation can help themselves. Of course, all we really see on the news is the effects of the crash of systems, it’s what makes good television. They don’t show organisations that had good business continuity plans in place and could continue to operate, albeit with reduced functionality.

What struck me, watching it all unfold, was that there were some big organisations that were caught completely on the hop. We saw airline staff reverting to manual ticketing but the overall impression is that this was being done on the initiative of individuals and onsite managers, it didn’t seem to be part of coherent planning. Likewise, we saw the same type of issues in the UK NHS and GP surgeries. If there really was a coherent plan in place, I apologise for suggesting that that wasn’t the case, but it sure didn’t look like it was. Those 2 examples are the really big ones that hit the news. There were quite literally hundreds of organisations that were hit and struggled badly.

When I started out in the Cyber Security game, disaster recovery and business continuity planning were absolutely must haves, in fact, as we know, you can’t achieve ISO 2700x certification without it. These days I see very little emphasis being put on this. Have we reached a stage of total reliance on technology and tech giants like CloudStrike and Microsoft, so that we have fallen into a complacency, relying on our suppliers to look after us? If we have, I think that this shows that this is a big mistake. A great saying is that you can outsource your IT but you can’t outsource your responsibility.

Which leads us neatly onto another point. Supply chain security. We talk a lot about making sure our supply chain is as robust as our own systems and that they have good security, and good policies and processes. But this shows that we need to go further than that. We just can’t trust that any software installed will work and not cause problems, we need to ask questions about how rigorous their testing is, who signs off on a release, how is released and by whom? What tests were done before release? These are perfectly valid questions and any software supplier worth their salt has to have good answers for these questions. Any of you ever asked?

As a provider of protective monitoring solutions which require a light touch agent to be installed on systems, albeit on a much smaller scale than CloudStrike, this has given considerable pause for thought. I have already had these discussions with my supply chain and got good answers, but I’m not going to take my foot off the gas and will keep asking before agent upgrades, which admittedly, don’t happen often. But there will be a certain nervousness in the future when it does happen.

How Can We See a Return on Investment from our Cyber Security Spend?

How are businesses improved through good cyber security? It’s a question just about every customer, or prospective customer, of ours asks themselves. They need to see a return on investment, after all, if you don’t see anything tangible for your money, you’re unlikely to keep going down that road.

When my business partner and I set up H2 after we returned from the Middle East where we’d been working for the HP division that was busy merging itself with CSC (been there done that, didn’t fancy returning to it), the whole question of how we could offer something that gave that return on investment, occupied much of our thinking. What services could we offer at a price that businesses were prepared to pay, and what tangible benefits could we offer?

At first, we were purely a services company, proudly product agnostic, recommending the right products for the right solutions for the right customer. Not at all altruistic, but rather we felt that was the right thing to do be doing. Like many people we didn’t see COVID coming around the corner like a freight train. The pandemic didn’t just change how we would be delivering our services, it changed the whole market, it changed working practices, which are still evolving. That meant that we had to change or die. A stark choice but not one that could be avoided or put off. Like many businesses we had to reengineer the business from the ground up whilst still providing services that customers wanted and could see a need for.

An interesting google search is finding out what businesses are researching online. I was quite surprised to find that the question ‘what is a cyber-attack?’, is the most searched phrase, by a long shot. This suggests that many are still confused as to what a cyber-attack actually is. Breaking that down, its probably not all that surprising because of all the various types of cyber-attack that are constantly being rammed down peoples’ throats and I think the cyber security industry needs to take responsibility for that. There’s a big difference between education and propaganda. FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) is a common method used by many to sell security. Personally, I’m not in favour of doing that. I like to educate, not scare.

Other subjects being searched for are ransomware, phishing, spoofing, cyber threats, insider threats and cyber awareness (there are more but they’re a long way down the list).

What people want to know hasn’t changed all that much, neither has the types of threats. What has changed is how those threats present themselves, how the methodologies have changed in order to match new technologies and working practices, particularly the move to remote or home working and the additional threats that this poses. AI is making a big impact already and that impact is going to get bigger as time goes on. Email spoofing for example, that is faking an email purporting to come someone legitimate in order to get someone to take some action that is in some way fraudulent, is now being done over the phone with AI being used to fake someones voice. It’s a scary development and there are now several well reported instances of this happening in the US. If it’s happening there, it’s only a matter of time for it to happen in the UK and across Europe.

One of the first services we offered was the Cyber Maturity Assessment and our very first client took that service. Our brief was to examine their Cyber Security and Data Protection posture, including policies, processes and technical configuration and controls. They were pleased that our assessment was very comprehensive in discovering the threats and vulnerabilities to their systems and that we described them in terms of business risk. We developed comprehensive policies and processes that were all encompassing and designed to fit in with the style and presentation of their employee handbook. All good but it required us to attend their site for a couple of days which was, at one time, normal and acceptable but in terms of the ‘new normal’, not so much.

Whilst we still offer that service, remote services are much more popular and much more in keeping with how businesses are now operating. It doesn’t much matter where their staff are working, home, office or on the move. What matters is that their protections are maintained regardless.

As we developed our new offerings we researched and came up with solutions that do just that. We adopted Software as a Service (SaaS) and found some very innovative solutions that we can use to provide a managed security service to our clients at a very affordable price.

Returning to our first paragraph, how do we show a return on investment? Using our SaaS platform, we offer a 14 day free trial during which we can show a client where they currently stand and then carry out some quick remediations to show how that can be improved, so that the client can see the value of what they are going to get, using their own data. It works and I commend it to you.

Check it out – https://hah2.co.uk/

KASPERSKY BANNED IN THE US

The US has announced plans to ban the sale of antivirus software made by Russian firm Kaspersky due to its alleged links to the Kremlin (source article https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ceqq7663wd2o). This shouldn’t have come as a great shock. In 2017 the Department of Homeland Security banned the anti-virus product from federal networks, and it has long been a target for US regulators.

There have always been some rather vague clouds over Kaspersky. I well remember going back to 2010//11, working on a major UK Government sensitive project where we had one guy pushing Kaspersky hard, really fighting its corner but it soon became clear that the customer wasn’t going to use it under any circumstances. But why? Kaspersky has always scored very high, in fact near perfect scores, when tested independently by AV-TEST, the most trusted source for independent testing.

Well, it’s all about the problem that it’s Russian owned and to provide a transliteration from Russian, Laboratoriya Kasperskogo. In the UK it’s operated by a holding company. Nonetheless the code comes from Russia and that’s going to have a very real impact on the US, especially given it’s almost total breakdown of relations and the ongoing Ukraine conflict. Only the US Dept of Homeland Security knows whether this is a very real threat to western company’s using this suite of products, or if there’s a political element to it. Either way, it’s going to damage Kaspersky, totally decimating its sales in the US.

The big question here in the UK, and across Europe and many Asian countries, is, is it safe to use? In the UK, the British Standards Institute (BSI) has found no evidence of current problems with Kaspersky products. However, it went on to recommend that its anti-virus products be replaced with alternatives. Talk about sitting on the fence and damning with faint praise!

On 29 March the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) issued refreshed guidance on UK organisations’ use of technology originating from Russian companies, saying it is not at this time necessary, or necessarily wise, to discontinue use of products such as Kaspersky antivirus (AV) products. That guidance is now nearly 3 months old, and it remains to be seen if it gets updated following the US action.

The judgement that companies will need to make is, whether renewing or looking to replace a current vendor, do we take a risk on Kaspersky? Having been in this industry for many years, I know that there are lovers out there, of specific products and/or vendors, who will make this a hill to die on, but there are others who will adopt a much more cautious approach. I don’t expect to see organisations rushing to ditch Kaspersky but I think their sales people, and their resellers, will find new sales and renewals, a real challenge.

Of course I can’t let this pass without a pitch. So, if you want to take what I say as being tainted by the fact that I re-sell another product, then guilty m’lud, and I’ll take that on the chin. The product we sell is one that is in heavy use by the US Department of Defense, as well as industries akin, including the nuclear industry. It’s been pen tested to death and proof can be shown. It has a unique approach in that it simply stops unauthorised programs from running. But how? Data is stored either as non-runnable info data or runnable application programs. Malware is a type of runnable program with undesirable behaviours. The system uses what is called a Hard Disk Firewall (HDF). HDF prevents malware infection, stopping malware program files from being stored and run on a computer. Simply put it takes about a 30 day period to examine your network and end points, identifying what executables are being run and then, working with you, we decide which of those should be whitelisted to ensure your business isn’t impacted in any way, and anything not on the whitelist is blocked from running. If you want to know more you can contact us on the links below.

Security Tools