General Security Issues

New Cyber Threats and Innovations

Cybersecurity is an ever-evolving field, with new threats and innovations emerging regularly. Not all these threats will apply to everyone, the trick is, and has always been, identifying the threats that apply to you, working out how vulnerable you are too those threats, and applying controls to bring those down to an acceptable level.  That acceptable level will change, not just from company to company, but also asset to asset.  Don’t waste valuable time and energy trying to achieve a zero-threat level.  It doesn’t exist.  You need to understand clearly what your appetite for risk is, ie what is an acceptable level of risk for you, and then go for it. 

But what emerging threats are there that you just might have to combat in your daily business life.  These trends highlight the ongoing innovation in both cyber threats and defences, driven by the growing reliance on digital infrastructure and the rapid evolution of technology.

Here are some suggestions and trends in cybersecurity as of late 2024:

1. AI-Powered Cyber Attacks and Defences

Threats:  Cybercriminals are increasingly using AI to launch more sophisticated attacks, such as AI-driven phishing campaigns, automated hacking attempts, and machine learning-based malware that adapts to security measures.  We’re seeing AI powered social engineering, phone calls mimicking voices of managers, and similar.  Like with just about all AI usage, what it does it make things much easier by reducing human effort.  So, attacks can be set up using AI and become almost fire and forget, just letting it get on with it in the background.

Defense: Organisations are countering this with AI-based threat detection systems, anomaly detection, and predictive analytics to identify potential breaches before they occur.  What about your defences?  Are they keeping up with these types of threat.  What about mobile workforces, are your staff covered once they leave the office; do you have a hybrid or even fully remote workforce?  If so, are your defences up to the job? Check out https://hah2.co.uk/

2. Ransomware Evolution

Ransomware continues to be a major threat, but it’s evolving with more advanced encryption techniques, and multi-stage attacks where attackers exfiltrate data before encrypting it. They then threaten to publish the stolen data unless a ransom is paid.  I recently heard of a company that had been infiltrated through its website which was transactional, ie it sold stuff via the website and the website was connected to their database of products and sales order processing system.  The web developer didn’t have sufficiently robust security in place.  A good example of an SME being exploited via their supply chain.

Double extortion and Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) have become more common, where hackers sell ransomware kits to other criminals.

3. Zero Trust Architecture

Zero Trust has moved from a buzzword to a mainstream security model. Organisations are adopting a “never trust, always verify” approach, assuming that every user and device, both inside and outside the network, could be compromised.

Implementing least privilege access, micro-segmentation, and continuous authentication are key features of this approach.  And no, this doesn’t have to be cost prohibitive.

4. Supply Chain Attacks

Attacks targeting third-party vendors and software providers have increased. By compromising trusted suppliers, attackers can infiltrate many organisations through a single breach.

Notable Examples: The SolarWinds and Kaseya attacks were significant instances that highlighted the dangers of such supply chain vulnerabilities.  The attack on the NHS via a contracted service provider, is also a good example but it doesn’t just affect the big organisations.  See above for an example of how an SME was attacked via a third-party web designer.

5. Post-Quantum Cryptography

With quantum computing on the horizon, there’s increasing focus on developing encryption algorithms that can resist quantum attacks. Post-quantum cryptography is becoming a hot topic as organisations prepare for the future of computing.

Even without quantum computing, many organisations do not use encryption, even for their critical data.  If you are subject to a data breach, but that data is encrypted, you could save yourself a lot of money and reputational damage.

6. Cloud Security and Misconfiguration

As cloud adoption accelerates, the security of cloud environments remains a top concern. Misconfigured cloud settings continue to expose sensitive data, while cloud-native security solutions (e.g., CSPM, CWPP) are becoming more prevalent.

Securing multi-cloud environments and addressing shared responsibility models are critical challenges.

7. Cybersecurity for IoT and OT

The Internet of Things (IoT) and Operational Technology (OT) are becoming frequent attack targets. Securing connected devices, industrial systems, and critical infrastructure from cyber threats is a growing concern, especially as they are often lacking in adequate security protocols.

This is becoming more critical as home working becomes more and more popular.  Employees connecting to your company cloud and systems using home broadband and WIFI, are also de fact connecting to any IOT devices that they are using in the home, potentially opening up back doors into your system.

8. Data Privacy Regulations and Compliance

Data privacy is a key focus as more countries introduce stricter regulations like the Data Protection Act 2018, now becoming known as UK GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation). There are other compliances such as FSA regulations and other industry bodies, that many need adherence to.  Data breaches can produce fines from regulatory bodies, law suites from those affected, and quite severe reputational damage.

9. Cybersecurity Automation and SOAR

Automation is becoming critical in cybersecurity due to the sheer volume of threats. Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) tools help streamline incident detection and response, freeing up analysts to focus on complex tasks.

Do you have anything in place to automate your defences?  Do you monitor your systems for threats?

10. Identity and Access Management (IAM)

Identity theft and credential stuffing attacks are rising, making IAM solutions more important than ever. Multi-factor authentication (MFA), password less authentication, and biometrics are seeing widespread adoption to prevent unauthorised access.

Farewell to Bob – A data protection swan song

Today is somewhat of a sad day for me as tomorrow I will attend Bob Hays funeral.  Bob and I started this business when we both returned from Dubai where we worked for HPE in their cyber security business, across the Middle East.  We came a long way since starting up in 2017 even though COVID happened in the middle, changing the way that business was conducted by many companies and therefore how we had to adapt and change in order to compete and provide the services needed by the new normal.  I think we did a pretty good job all told.

In honour of Bob, I thought I’d focus my blog this week on data protection, his pet subject.  He always went to great lengths to point out that we weren’t lawyers but were providing the how to, rather than the legal requirements of data protection legislation.  He always said that lawyers were great at telling us what we need to do to meet our legal obligations but were lousy at telling us how to do it.

Data Protection, a somewhat dry subject that many companies, particularly SMEs, think they can get away from by simply paying a bit of lip service.  The Data Protection Act 2018, or as it has become known, UK GDPR, is far from a toothless beast and can cause businesses to find themselves in all sorts of problems if they’re not careful.

Businesses that you might not think about, like Estate Agents, hold large amounts of personally identifiable information or PII, that is information that can identify a living individual.  Not so long ago a London estate agent was fined £80,000 by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), after leaving the personal data of more than 18,000 customers exposed for almost two years.

The incident occurred when the estate agent passed the details from its own servers onto a partner company. An “Anonymous Authentication” function was not switched off, which meant there were no access restrictions to the data.

It’s surprising just how much PII estate agents hold.  Just think about what they ask for when you’re buying a house.  In this case the exposed details included bank statements, salary details, copies of passports, dates of birth and addresses of both tenants and landlords.

But in some cases that might not be the end of it.  Individuals can sue companies that release data into the wild.  In fact, there are now law firms advertising no win no fee when representing these cases.  Remember that data breaches almost always involve multiple people, sometimes hundreds if not thousands of records.

One thing that many misunderstand is the link between cyber security and data protection.  The Act requires personal data to be secured by ‘default and design’.  This means that cyber security requirements must be designed into your data protection processes which could considerably increase the number of policies and processes you require to stay safe and within the law.

Data Protection is a bit of a bureaucratic nightmare I have to admit.  Here at H2 we have a raft of templates we use, originally drafted up by Bob, that have been successfully introduced into a variety of organisations, often integrated with their company handbooks.  These include:

Data Protection – Overarching PolicyData Protection Training
Data Protection – ConsentConsent Withdrawal
Subject Access RequestData Protection Complaints
Retention of RecordsData Breach Notification (note there is an electronic version of this on the ICO website)
Data Protection Impact Assessment Procedure  Security & Control of data protection documentation  
Policy Management Review ProcedureInternal Data Protection Breach Register
Retention & Disposal of Records RegisterData Protection Officer (DPO) Responsibilities  
Required records to be maintained 

Of course these aren’t necessarily the only things needed, there are a whole list of cyber security policies required to complement these.  Nearly all are available online, but the problem is knowing what you need and what you don’t and not just downloading, topping and tailing, and hoping for the best.  That happens all too often.

Our approach to this has been refined over the years as not just the legislation evolves, both here and in Europe, but as working practices evolve alongside it.  We have spent many hours researching solutions and crafting them into services that meet the requirements, which in turn have evolved into a system which works, is both affordable and appropriate for all types of business, and is accreditable to standards such as cyber essentials, if that is required.  Flexibility is another key attribute that the new working practices demand.  Long gone is the old bastion security system whereby everyone works within a secure boundary, protected by firewalls and other similar technologies.  These days we need a system of protection that works regardless of where you are working, office, home, on the move, and can switch seamlessly between them.

When we are first approached by a prospective client and we begin our offer of a free trial to examine their requirements, one of the first things we find is that they don’t know what data they are holding, or where it all is.  Oh, they have a general idea; it’s on the cloud server(s), it’s not on laptops or desktops, it’s just the stuff we need to process our clients’ requirements and yes, we’ve only got one copy.  And then we install our software that first carries out a discovery exercise and we find that their laptops/desktops are holding lots of copies of the data that is on the cloud server(s).  How does that happen?  Over time, especially with many now employing the hybrid system of working, ie between the office and remote (home) locations, employees log on to the cloud, find they have a bit of shaky internet link and download the data they need, work on it and then upload it again, forgetting to delete it from their machine.  Or they need to share it and attach it to an email and send it out, forgetting, or perhaps not realising, that the data is now stored, attached to an email, on their email server.

Then comes the issue with audit trails.  If the ICO ever wanted to carry out an investigation, then having an audit trail of who created/copied/deleted/forwarded what to who, is essential.  And let’s not forget the member of the public who is fully entitled to submit a Data Subject Access Request or DSAR, which demands that you reveal what data you are holding on that person.  The law insists on it, and you can’t refuse it.  I know of a financial firm that took nearly 3 weeks to satisfy a DSAR, taking an employee off billing, for that time.

Our solution meets the requirements needed today and not only that, has a built-in encryption system, all within the same monthly cost.  It’ll cost you nothing to trial it and we’d be very surprised if once you’ve seen it and seen the ridiculously low monthly charge for the managed service, you don’t want to keep it.

So a final farewell to Bob, with thanks for all his work in the data protection arena, and for the friendship forged in 3 different company’s before we took the bull by the horns and went out on our own.

Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity         

I’ve made quite a bit recently about cyber resilience and the focus being placed on computer outages caused by third party suppliers, highlighted by not just the CloudStrike issue but also the ransomware attack on the UK NHS, made possible by infiltrating a key supplier.  All of this of course highlights the importance of supply chain security, but my focus today will be all about disaster recovery and business continuity.

Disaster recovery and business continuity are very much connected but are different.  The former is basically a plan for when things go sideways—like when a natural disaster hits, a cyberattack happens, or even if there’s a major tech failure. It’s all about making sure that businesses can bounce back and keep things running as smoothly as possible. Imagine your favourite coffee shop gets flooded. Disaster recovery is like their game plan for getting back on their feet: they might have backup equipment stored somewhere, a way to communicate with customers, and a strategy for cleaning up and reopening. In the tech world, it often involves regular backups of data, having alternate servers ready to go, and making sure everyone knows what to do in case of an emergency. The goal? To minimize downtime and get everything back to normal without too much hassle. It’s like having an insurance policy but for your operations—very important for keeping the lights on when the unexpected hits!

However, we need to understand that when it comes to the type of outages caused by supply chain cyber failures as we saw with CloudStrike, there isn’t much a customer can do to recover from that, without fixes from the suppliers.  So, in this instance disaster recovery planning becomes a little difficult to say the least.

Business continuity on the other hand, is all about making sure that a company can keep running smoothly when it is deprived of their IT systems, in whole or in part.  So, it’s about keeping business running whilst the disaster recovery plan kicks in and gets stuff back online.  The idea is to have a plan in place that helps the business bounce back quickly. This includes figuring out which critical functions need to keep going, having some way of operating manually if necessary.  Can you place an order, process an order, raise an invoice, pay a bill etc. It’s like having an emergency kit for your business—batteries included! Companies should create a business continuity plan (BCP) that outlines the steps they’ll take during a crisis. This way, they don’t just react on the fly; they can hit the ground running. It’s all about minimising downtime and keeping customers happy. In short, it’s like being prepared for a rainy day—just with more spreadsheets and meetings!

The first thing to decide is what the priorities are regarding business processes.  What is essential, what is a nice to have and what you can live without in the short to medium term.  Don’t leave it to managers and staff to guess, have it documented.  This priority order is determined based on what is known as a business impact analysis (BIA).  This determines the impact of an outage on the business and its customers.  Don’t ever forget that your reputation is on the line, and you need to keep your customers serviced and happy.  Each business process should have recovery time attached to it, ie how long you can do without it before it becomes truly disastrous.

It all sounds terribly complicated and therefore expensive, but in fact, it isn’t.  All the information you need to work this out is already in your hands.  You know your business best and you know what’s important and what isn’t quite so important.  You just have probably never written it down. And that’s the crux of the matter.

Disaster recovery planning addresses the processes, technical requirements and infrastructure an organisation needs to implement to recover data and operations as required by the business in the event of a disaster. The planning process will involve identification of critical business processes, business impact analysis and thus determination of the overall requirements for a cost-effective plan.

Following the disaster recovery plan, business recovery planning is the process that organisations must use to assess appropriate timeframes for business resumption, also allowable data losses and risk tolerances for business disruptions.  As stated earlier, it also needs a plan to carry on manually whilst the disaster recovery plan is implemented.  Budgetary requirements for infrastructure and processes, to meet the disaster recovery plan, will also be determined by the business recovery planning process.

There are also 2 other key parts to this.  Firstly, companies must ensure that their plans are tested, that everyone in the company is aware of them, where they can find them, and what their responsibilities are in this regard.  Testing is critical to ensure that processes, systems and business restoration can meet the requirements laid down for them.  Where the plans rely on third party service providers and/or indicate the need to support key customers, these should be involved in the testing process. This will give re-assurance that support will be received and/or given as expected.

And then we have key stakeholders.  Who in your organisation is responsible for what, regarding disaster recovery and business continuity planning?  Do they know their respective responsibilities, have they accepted this?  Have you placed this in their job descriptions?  Can they be held to this responsibility?  Are they part of the planning and testing process?  All seems a bit obvious when you say it, but you’ll probably not be surprised to know that it’s often totally overlooked.

Key StakeholdersRoles and Responsibilities
CEO/Board of DirectorsAware of business continuity processes, inputs as required Approval of business continuity processes and integration with other technical functions – Note 1 Ownership of business continuity processes together with relevant business units – Note 1
Infrastructure (IT operations)Input into business continuity processes.  Consideration of any infrastructure changes which may impact security architecture. Provide inputs and coordination for systems’ resiliency testing and remediation.  Provide costs/budgets for systems requirements
Business unitsCreation of BIA and corresponding recovery requirements.  Budgetary approval.

Note 1 – these two functions would be carried out by a CIO and/or and CISO in a larger organisation, but as most, even top end, SMBs are unlikely to have anyone in that role, then it must be owned by other board members. I hope this is helpful, but it can only be a guide and there is no one size fits all solution. 

Still on the subject of Cyber Resilience………

Last week I talked about whether our ability to demonstrate resilience in the cyber field, is impacted by an over reliance on the companies who supply our IT products and services, and whether over time, that reliance has grown to the point where we are ignoring our own responsibilities in this area.  I have used the phrase that you can outsource your IT, but you can’t outsource your responsibility.  At the end of the day, there is only you and your employees who have the best interests of you company at heart.  You wouldn’t tolerate a single point of failure in your business, you would try and ensure that there is resilience built into your business processes.  Why then do we not apply that to IT?

It’s a fact, which often goes unrecognised or ignored, that cyber security is not a technical issue but a business issue, and as such much of it is reliant on policy and process.  It is also a fact that your employees are both your first line of defence and potentially, your weakest link.  Technology comes in in third place.  The cyber mantra is People, Process, Technology.  If your people don’t have at least a basic understanding of the issues involved, and you do not have the right policies and processes, rolled out to, and understood by all who need them, then all the technology in the world is likely to be a waste of money.

People

Let’s take a closer look, starting with People.  Many businesses out there don’t have inhouse IT support but outsource that to an IT provider.  That’s fine, you can ensure that your contract with them spells out their responsibilities regarding your security, your data.  It then becomes their responsibility to ensure they protect to the standard stated in the contract, and that their people understand their responsibility.  However, you still have your own staff who interact with suppliers, customers and possibly members of the public, on your behalf.  I’ve discussed in my blogs before that most businesses are more likely to suffer from scams, than they are from technical hacks.  Even ransomware can be considered a scam, as can most phishing attacks.  The cyber-criminal is relying on someone on your staff to click a malicious link, or access something they shouldn’t, in order to facilitate the scam.  Staff often make the mistake of opening malware because they didn’t know they shouldn’t, not because they are themselves malicious or lack common sense.  If they fail, it’s often because they haven’t had any training.  Likewise, staff can make mistakes, such as copying and releasing data to unauthorised persons, because they didn’t know they shouldn’t.  So, whose failures are those, staff or managers?

Cyber Awareness Training (https://hah2.co.uk/cyber-awareness-training-smes/)

It is critical to the success of the cyber-security resilience that the organisation develops a mature culture of understanding and awareness about cyber risks. Above all this is an issue that must be driven from the top of the organisation – unless cyber-security has the full support of the Board it will be impossible to generate the level of commitment necessary to develop the culture of awareness.

Awareness and understanding of cyber risks are so important because these are the essential elements of the “human firewall” that is all that stands between the organisation’s critical IT systems and the clever social engineering tactics of sophisticated cyber-criminals. Such tactics are even more ubiquitous in our “always on” culture that is driven by the social media and applications accessed through smartphones and other mobile devices.  Employees need to be aware of the cyber risks inherent in the devices that are part of their everyday lives; and of the damage to their occupation and livelihoods that can be done as a result of ignorance, carelessness or inattention in their use (and abuse) of such devices.

For the security function in an organisation, the development of a mature culture of awareness and understanding is also critical. In order to achieve the shift in thinking needed to develop the culture of awareness, four things are required:

  • Board and CEO Level involvement and support
  • Training that is relevant to the job function.  Giving technical awareness training to a shop floor worker will have no impact.  If lessons from the training can be taken home and used there as well, big dividends will accrue from the reinforcement provide.
  • Training must be fun.  A little humour lightens the load and will brighten the day of employees and mean that they are more likely to remember what was taught.
  • Training must be continual.  It is more effective to do a little training each month than to have a single long session. 

Policy and Process

Moving onto to processes now.  First and foremost, all companies should have a cyber security policy.  It doesn’t need to be more than a page and should lay down what other polices are needed and who is responsible for producing them and keeping them in date.  Any of you who have achieved an ISO certification, in whatever subject you needed to, will have had a similar process to go through and if you ever wanted to achieve ISO27001, then you would need to fully understand and comply with this.

The development and documentation of an agreed set of clear and coherent policies and supporting standards, processes and baselines are essential to the success of a cyber-security program. These must be signed off at board level and preferably set within the context of the organisations cyber-security strategy. However, the nature of the policies and supporting elements themselves will, to some extent, also be governed by the risk management controls that are needed in order to manage risk to a level that is consistent with the organisation’s assessed risk, overall risk appetite and budgetary and cost constraints.  I talked about risk management last week and that can be found at https://hah2.co.uk/are-we-failing-in-our-cyber-resilience/.

The are 3 elements to this that are essential:

  • Policy.
  • Standards and processes.
  • Minimum baselines.

This may seem onerous and a step too far for many businesses but they are essential to ensure that you are self-reliant and resilient.  The whole process need not be that difficult or expensive and it is a lot cheaper than many of the technical solutions managers jump to, without first ensuring that such technologies are actually what is required.  We can offer advice and guidance in this area (https://hah2.co.uk/why-use-an-independent-board-advisor/).

Policy is the highest element in the hierarchy – representing “why” the governance controls must be used. Below this, the standards and processes represent “what” needs to be implemented, in order to deliver compliance with the policy. Thirdly, minimum baselines constitute the element that shows “how” the standards and processes should be delivered. Each of the elements is discussed in more detail below.

Technology

Finally, we come to technology.  In last weeks blog (https://hah2.co.uk/are-we-failing-in-our-cyber-resilience/ ) I went into more detail about risk management and how we go about putting the right controls in the right place, to reduce our liability to the lowest level we can, without impacting operational resilience.  But let’s just reiterate that many of these controls will be procedural and not necessarily technical, or they might be a mix of the two.  The message is don’t get hung up on technology, approach it from a risk management point of view, treat IT and cyber security in the same way you would treat any other business process.  Don’t get swamped with technical jargon, it’s not that difficult.

Next Week

Another vital piece in our resilience matrix is disaster recovery and business continuity.  Not the same thing and I have already touched on this in recent articles (https://hah2.co.uk/you-can-outsource-your-it-but-you-cant-outsource-your-responsibility/), relevant to the current issues around CloudStrike.  Disaster recovery is how you plan to recover from a disaster whilst business continuity is all about how you keep the business running whilst you recover your IT assets and data.  It’s quite an involved subject and demands an article on its own.

Are we failing in our cyber resilience?

The fallout from the CloudStrike sensor failure, which caused severe outages throughout the globe, is still being felt and will be felt for some time to come.  The emphasis has been on recovery but that will start to change, as we focus more on why it happened, and what can be done to mitigate further failures of this kind.  I’ve said already, in a piece I wrote last week (https://hah2.co.uk/you-can-outsource-your-it-but-you-cant-outsource-your-responsibility/ ), that we appear to be becoming too reliant on our IT providers, particularly managed services, to ensure that we remain safe and our services can continue, and we aren’t looking too hard at ensuring resilience is built into our systems.  It begs the question, is business continuity planning no longer in fashion.

Alexander Rogan of Abatis also wrote a piece that’s worth reading (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/billions-lost-chaos-lessons-from-crowdstrike-microsoft-rogan-abxde/}.  In his article Alexander emphasises the importance of zero trust architecture and processes.  What this essentially means is that we cannot afford to trust anyone other than ourselves.  Suppliers are there to help and as such they should ensure that their own processes are robust and include thorough pre-production testing, controlled roll outs and good baseline security measures.  Where CrowdStrike falls in this regard, will I’m sure, get thoroughly tested in the not too distant future.

The UK Government is also questioning the resilience of business in the UK to cyber threats (https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jul/29/uk-desperately-exposed-to-cyber-threats-and-pandemics-says-minister), and in this case a cyber threat is not necessarily confined to security, it can also mean a crash due to a technical or process failure.

In the cyber security industry, there has long been a running war between those that sell products and those of us concerned more with services.  Having been in the industry for 30 years, I have seen this time and again and the product sales nearly always win.  Why?  Simply because services are a hard sell with a long timeline whereas product sales are easier and quicker to achieve.  Why would that be?  Again, simple, people like to be able to quickly demonstrate a return on investment.  They like to see a product, doing its stuff, even when often, they don’t realise how it’s doing what it’s doing, or if it’s the right product in the right place at the right time.

The risk managed approach is the way to go every time.  That has not changed at all in the 30 years I’ve been plugging away at it.  It’s all about People, Process and then Technology.  I often quote Bruce Schneier, a US scientist on the Harvard Faculty, and a thought leader in this space.  He says, ‘If you think technology can solve your security problems, then you don’t understand the problems and you don’t understand the technology’.  Breaking this down, what he’s getting at is that first and foremost, you must understand the risks that you face and to do that, you have to identify your cyber assets.  By that we don’t mean hardware and even software, what we are talking about is your data and the ability to keep your systems online and accessing what your staff and/or customers need to access, when they need to access it.  Once you identify your assets, you then need to identify the threats to those assets and how vulnerable you are too those threats.  Threat and vulnerability = risk.  And by that we mean the risk to the business if it all goes pear shaped.

Once that’s done, we can then allocate a risk score to each asset with the aim of managing that risk down to an acceptable level, known as the risk appetite.  That will change business to business, even asset to asset.  You wouldn’t for example allocate the same level of risk [to the business], to a revenue earning system, as you would to perhaps a purely admin system that contains no personal data.

This all sounds terribly difficult and expensive, and that’s why many companies simply don’t do it, or maybe they do a subset of it.  But unless you do, then it can be very difficult to know for sure that you are spending your limited budget on the right protections, in the right place.  In the long run, it can save you a lot of money. This same assessment applies equally to the CrowdStrike problem, or for that matter, any other company that you have in your supply chain.  You need to assess what damage they could do to you if they fail, and what you can do to mitigate that damage.  It’s very well and good reaching for the nearest lawyer when it’s all gone to hell, how much better to stop it, or mitigate it, before you get there.

You can outsource your IT, but you can’t outsource your responsibility

It’s hard to look anywhere without seeing reference to the CloudStrike/Microsoft disaster that is still causing issues around the globe.  There is plenty of plaudits for the way that both CloudStrike and Microsoft have handled the fall out and remediation (https://www.crowdstrike.com/falcon-content-update-remediation-and-guidance-hub/) but you can’t escape the conclusion that it shouldn’t have happened in the first place.  Something clearly went wrong in the processes either in place, or worse, not in place, to make sure that software releases are thoroughly tested before release.  I also read somewhere that there had been a previous problem with CloudStrike software releases which affected at least 2 versions of Linux, but that this went largely unnoticed.  I suppose the predominance of Windows machines in the marketplace would make it impossible to hide a problem of this magnitude.

All that said, what is clear is that there was nothing that an organisation using this application, could have done themselves to prevent it, neither could most disaster recovery plans have dealt with this successfully.  The remediation has to come from both CloudStrike and Microsoft, which it is. 

I wrote a piece recently which included the difference between disaster recovery and business continuity planning (https://hah2.co.uk/what-are-the-questions-business-owners-ask-when-considering-cyber-security/). Disaster Recovery focuses specifically on restoring IT infrastructure and data after a disaster has occurred, and as already pointed out, in this case that fix has to come from outside the affected organisations and there was very little they could do.

Business Continuity refers to the proactive strategies and plans put in place to ensure that essential business functions can continue in the event of a disruption or disaster. This where organisation can help themselves.  Of course, all we really see on the news is the effects of the crash of systems, it’s what makes good television.  They don’t show organisations that had good business continuity plans in place and could continue to operate, albeit with reduced functionality. 

What struck me, watching it all unfold, was that there were some big organisations that were caught completely on the hop.  We saw airline staff reverting to manual ticketing but the overall impression is that this was being done on the initiative of individuals and onsite managers, it didn’t seem to be part of coherent planning.  Likewise, we saw the same type of issues in the UK NHS and GP surgeries.  If there really was a coherent plan in place, I apologise for suggesting that that wasn’t the case, but it sure didn’t look like it was.  Those 2 examples are the really big ones that hit the news.  There were quite literally hundreds of organisations that were hit and struggled badly.

When I started out in the Cyber Security game, disaster recovery and business continuity planning were absolutely must haves, in fact, as we know, you can’t achieve ISO 2700x certification without it.  These days I see very little emphasis being put on this.  Have we reached a stage of total reliance on technology and tech giants like CloudStrike and Microsoft, so that we have fallen into a complacency, relying on our suppliers to look after us?  If we have, I think that this shows that this is a big mistake.  A great saying is that you can outsource your IT but you can’t outsource your responsibility.

Which leads us neatly onto another point.  Supply chain security.  We talk a lot about making sure our supply chain is as robust as our own systems and that they have good security, and good policies and processes.  But this shows that we need to go further than that.  We just can’t trust that any software installed will work and not cause problems, we need to ask questions about how rigorous their testing is, who signs off on a release, how is released and by whom?  What tests were done before release?  These are perfectly valid questions and any software supplier worth their salt has to have good answers for these questions.  Any of you ever asked?

As a provider of protective monitoring solutions which require a light touch agent to be installed on systems, albeit on a much smaller scale than CloudStrike, this has given considerable pause for thought.  I have already had these discussions with my supply chain and got good answers, but I’m not going to take my foot off the gas and will keep asking before agent upgrades, which admittedly, don’t happen often.  But there will be a certain nervousness in the future when it does happen.

How Can We See a Return on Investment from our Cyber Security Spend?

How are businesses improved through good cyber security?  It’s a question just about every customer, or prospective customer, of ours asks themselves.  They need to see a return on investment, after all, if you don’t see anything tangible for your money, you’re unlikely to keep going down that road.

When my business partner and I set up H2 after we returned from the Middle East where we’d been working for the HP division that was busy merging itself with CSC (been there done that, didn’t fancy returning to it), the whole question of how we could offer something that gave that return on investment, occupied much of our thinking.  What services could we offer at a price that businesses were prepared to pay, and what tangible benefits could we offer?

At first, we were purely a services company, proudly product agnostic, recommending the right products for the right solutions for the right customer.  Not at all altruistic, but rather we felt that was the right thing to do be doing.  Like many people we didn’t see COVID coming around the corner like a freight train.  The pandemic didn’t just change how we would be delivering our services, it changed the whole market, it changed working practices, which are still evolving.  That meant that we had to change or die.  A stark choice but not one that could be avoided or put off.  Like many businesses we had to reengineer the business from the ground up whilst still providing services that customers wanted and could see a need for.

An interesting google search is finding out what businesses are researching online.  I was quite surprised to find that the question ‘what is a cyber-attack?’, is the most searched phrase, by a long shot.  This suggests that many are still confused as to what a cyber-attack actually is.  Breaking that down, its probably not all that surprising because of all the various types of cyber-attack that are constantly being rammed down peoples’ throats and I think the cyber security industry needs to take responsibility for that.  There’s a big difference between education and propaganda.  FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) is a common method used by many to sell security.  Personally, I’m not in favour of doing that.  I like to educate, not scare.

Other subjects being searched for are ransomware, phishing, spoofing, cyber threats, insider threats and cyber awareness (there are more but they’re a long way down the list).

What people want to know hasn’t changed all that much, neither has the types of threats.  What has changed is how those threats present themselves, how the methodologies have changed in order to match new technologies and working practices, particularly the move to remote or home working and the additional threats that this poses.  AI is making a big impact already and that impact is going to get bigger as time goes on.  Email spoofing for example, that is faking an email purporting to come someone legitimate in order to get someone to take some action that is in some way fraudulent, is now being done over the phone with AI being used to fake someones voice.  It’s a scary development and there are now several well reported instances of this happening in the US.  If it’s happening there, it’s only a matter of time for it to happen in the UK and across Europe.

One of the first services we offered was the Cyber Maturity Assessment and our very first client took that service.  Our brief was to examine their Cyber Security and Data Protection posture, including policies, processes and technical configuration and controls. They were pleased that our assessment was very comprehensive in discovering the threats and vulnerabilities to their systems and that we described them in terms of business risk.  We developed comprehensive policies and processes that were all encompassing and designed to fit in with the style and presentation of their employee handbook.  All good but it required us to attend their site for a couple of days which was, at one time, normal and acceptable but in terms of the ‘new normal’, not so much.

Whilst we still offer that service, remote services are much more popular and much more in keeping with how businesses are now operating.  It doesn’t much matter where their staff are working, home, office or on the move.  What matters is that their protections are maintained regardless.

As we developed our new offerings we researched and came up with solutions that do just that.  We adopted Software as a Service (SaaS) and found some very innovative solutions that we can use to provide a managed security service to our clients at a very affordable price. 

Returning to our first paragraph, how do we show a return on investment?  Using our SaaS platform, we offer a 14 day free trial during which we can show a client where they currently stand and then carry out some quick remediations to show how that can be improved, so that the client can see the value of what they are going to get, using their own data.  It works and I commend it to you.

Check it out – https://hah2.co.uk/

RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT

Some introspection is good for the soul they say, and I can’t help but try and apply that to how we, ie so called cyber security professionals, approach prospective clients, or indeed, converse with existing clients.  Is there a certain smugness involved where we believe we know best and whether we do or not, try and push what we think a client should have, rather than what a client needs.  Does this attitude, no matter how hard we try to suppress it, make prospective clients wary of what we have to say?

Of course we have our methodologies, particularly regarding risk management, and I am a great exponent of getting that right, but how many of us take the time and make the effort, to understand the clients situation.  It’s what we used to call situational awareness.  It didn’t just refer to a client understanding their own situation, but us appreciating that situation as well.  After all, not all clients, even those in the same vertical and the same size of business, has exactly the same problems.

A lot depends on who you are and who you work for.  The larger IT system integrators and consultancies do take the time to try and understand their clients.  In fact, going back to the early 2000s, working for a multinational IT product and services giant, we never actually outright tried to sell anything.  Our salespeople at the enterprise level, were very much relationship managers, they built relationships with their clients, got to know their businesses and made suggestions that the client might be interested in.  The mantra was that people buy from people, not from brands.  Brands are great in the marketing context, building awareness and a market presence, but they never seal the deal. 

Of course, at the start of a sales year some bright young thing sporting an MBA and a burning ambition would move the salespeople around, ruining years of relationship building and vertical knowledge, because ‘it needs shaking up’.  The end result is hacked off employees who look elsewhere and hacked off clients who think, well, if I have to start with someone else, I’d might as well see what else is out there.  But that’s a whole other story.

Research your client, understand their business, make sure you’re building a relationship with the right person.  Understand the industry, their pain points and needs.  Only then can you really start to craft a value proposition and call to action that the client can relate to.  Foster that relationship, make sure that not every call you make is about your products and/or services, make it more personal.  Above all, be genuine, it pays off in the end.

I guess what I’m getting at is that it really is all about building relationships with people.  You can have a deep understanding of your subject, fantastic product knowledge and a sparkling personality, but if you talk down to a prospective client, come across as in anyway condescending or patronising, you’ve lost the game.  You have to listen, ask intelligent questions, show that you are really interested in understanding the issues that face this prospective client, and make suggestions that might be suitable to solve the pain points being put in front of you.

We decided a couple of years ago, to offer a service which we entitle Board Advisor (https://hah2.co.uk/why-use-an-independent-board-advisor).  The point was not to try and sell solutions, not to try and sell any particular product, but to work with our clients to identify the issues they really do face and work through those issues to identify potential solutions that will help them in their business by protecting those critical assets that would cripple the business if they were not available or were corrupted in some way.  It’s all about putting appropriate measures in place before disaster strikes and preventing the vastly higher costs of recovery post-breach, from immediate financial impacts to lasting reputational damage.

The security threat landscape is becoming both more sophisticated and easier to exploit by the less sophisticated.  This seems to be at odds but such things as artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming nearly every industry, including cybersecurity. Whilst AI enables enhanced threat detection and response, this powerful technology can also be weaponised by cyber criminals. As AI-driven cyber-attacks grow more advanced, organisations must act quickly to implement robust defences.  Trying to keep abreast of this whilst running a business and focusing on your core requirements, is daunting and frankly, you’re not going to succeed.

If you’d like to discuss the art of the possible, give us call.

What are the questions business owners ask when considering cyber security?

Another good question, or perhaps it should be, do they ask any questions, other than cost, about cyber security, or do they leave everything up to their IT support, whether contracted or in house?

What is the cost of ignoring cyber security?

Perhaps this is the first question that they should be asking.  The financial hit of a data breach can be crippling, especially for the smaller businesses who are perhaps running on tight margins and for whom cash flow is often critical.  The average clean up for a smallish business is about £27K. this relates to system restoration, hardware replacement, and the implementation of enhanced security measures. and doesn’t include financial loss from the actual data stolen, or whatever scam was perpetrated, and any fall out from compliance failures, such as fines from the ICO.  And at least a third of organisations admit to losing customers post a data breach, highlighting reputational damage and a loss of customer trust.

So, what should owners, managers and board members be asking?

I think many get bogged down in the technicalities of IT and don’t consider it in business terms.  They don’t think about the business impact of cyber security, about what it is they’re trying to protect.  It’s not your IT systems, it’s your data that is the crown jewels.  IT systems can be replaced but once the data is stolen, then you are in very real trouble.

Risk Management

First and foremost, the board members need to ask themselves if they have a good handle on their cyber risk.  Have they identified their cyber assets?  What is a cyber asset? Cyber assets are not just hardware and software, in fact those are often the least of your worries.  It’s the data, where it is and how it’s protected that is important.  Have you assessed the risk to those assets?  Have you assessed the training requirements for your staff, not just the techies but all staff?  Think People, Process and then Technology.

Once you have done this, then you can consider what controls need to be put in place to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.

Below is some of the controls you will need to consider.  This list is not exhaustive

1.        User Access Control (Admin access is a whole other discussion)

This isn’t just about passwords.  Yes, they remain important but on their own, they are no longer sufficient.   Nonetheless weak passwords, password re-use and password sharing remain one of the leading root causes of a data breach.  123456 and, believe it or not, password, remains the most used passwords across the world! 

It is imperative that you have a strong password policy, dictating not just the length of the password, but also its construction, ensuring that there is a good mix of upper and lower case characters, numbers and symbols, that together make things very difficult for password crackers.

On their own though passwords remain a potential weak spot.  Multi factor authentication (MFA), sometimes referred to as 2FA, provides that extra layer of defence and can help to protect against brute-force attacks, phishing scams, key-logging and social engineering.  MFA can be simply implemented on most email platforms and within various apps you are using.  For those of you trying for Cyber Essentials or ISO 27K series, MFA is mandatory, so make sure it’s put in place.  

2.        Are you backing up your files? 

This seems an obvious thing to do but you’d be surprised how often when trying to restore from a backup, it fails.  This is often because the backup routine was set up back in the mists of time and has never been reviewed and even more dangerous, it’s never been tested to see if it works.  Set up your backup regime, have it reviewed regularly and tested regularly to make sure it works.  If you are backing up online, keep in mind that if a cyber-criminal gets access to your systems to, for example, carry out a ransomware attack, then they can probably get at your back up as well.  So, belt and braces, consider having an offline backup as well as an online backup.  The latter is more convenient but can be corrupted.

3.        Do you train your staff in cyber awareness? 

My favourite subject – cyber awareness training.  Your first line of defence is your staff, but if not trained adequately, they can be your greatest vulnerability.  It’s known in the trade as the insider threat but it is caused mainly by human error, staff members doing something they shouldn’t, not maliciously but simply because they didn’t know they shouldn’t.  It actually accounts for 88% of data breaches. Providing your people with training on the threats, current scams and basic cyber awareness reduces the chance of a cyber-attack. This really is the easiest and cheapest quick win any organisation can take in reducing their risk exposure.

4.        Do your employees regularly travel or work remotely? 

This brings us neatly to what Microsoft coined as the New Normal.  Essentially this means remote working shared with in office working, known as the hybrid working model, or for some, moving to a totally remote working system.  Totally remote is not as common as hybrid working but is becoming more normal with certain size businesses in certain commercial verticals.  It’ll never work for everyone, but for those who have embraced it, it saves a considerable amount of expense.  It does however require us to rethink our cyber strategy.

Work-from-home employees are at much greater risk than those in offices. Since home connections are less secure, cybercriminals have an easier entry into the company network.  Furthermore, the explosion of various online tools, solutions, and services for collaboration and productivity tend to have the bare minimum of security default setting, and updates from third-party vendors can change security preferences and be easily overlooked.

Phishing becomes an even greater threat to home workers, often because, in an office environment, they have access to colleagues and managers, who they can approach for advice and guidance.  This is much harder to replicate with remote workers, especially those who may not be particularly tech savvy and who may not wish to become ‘burdensome’ to their co-workers.

Ransomware also enjoys an advantage in the work-from-home model.  If their connection to the company is blocked, it is more difficult for workers to get assistance from the right experts and authorities.  And since trust levels are lower when working from home, some workers will be concerned that they have “done something wrong” and so may be more reluctant to seek help. While this risk can be addressed by increased training, as well as messaging that vigilance and involving IT support will be rewarded, it can still be an uphill battle.

We need to break out of the old ‘bastion’ security model of a network protected by firewalls and other technologies and think about solutions that are designed to protect your assets regardless of where your employees work from.  They exist and aren’t hard to find.

Data tends to proliferate, especially when working remotely.  Cyber awareness training helps here, but it also helps for management to have a handle on data storage.  All organisations have this problem, but it becomes more acute for those businesses that hold large amounts of what is known as Personal Identifiable Information or PII.  This is information that can identify a living individual and compromise their privacy in some way.  Financial advisors, estate agents, solicitors etc, all share this issue.  The data protection act, becoming referred to as UK GDPR, is not a suggestion, it is law.

5.        Where is all your data stored and who has access to it? 

One of the biggest issues we find with organisations of all sizes, is that they think they know where all their data is but get quite a surprise when they discover multiple instances of the same data set.  This has become a real issue in that the new normal tempts users when working remotely, with possibly less than robust broadband, to copy data from cloud storage to their PC or laptop to ensure they can keep working on it.  Then they upload it again when they’ve finished but forget to delete their copy.  That’s just one instance but it is vital to understand where all this data is.  What if for instance, you get what is known as a subject access request, where a client or other member of the public wants to know exactly what personal data you have on them, and why.  I spoke to a financial advisor recently who told me that it took one of their partners off the road for 3 weeks, to discover where all the data was kept on just one person.  But under the law, they had no choice but to bite the bullet.

There are several systems on the market which will help with this but what most need now is a system that works regardless of the location of the user and continues providing that cover when the user moves from one location to another.  This is just a suggestion, but we’d be delighted to demo it to anyone who is interested.  https://hah2.co.uk/gdpr-data-protection/

6.        Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity

Business Continuity refers to the proactive strategies and plans put in place to ensure that essential business functions can continue in the event of a disruption or disaster. This could include natural disasters, cyber-attacks, power outages, or any other event that could disrupt normal business operations. Business Continuity planning typically involves identifying critical business processes, implementing redundant systems and processes, and developing communication plans to ensure that the organisation can continue to operate smoothly in the face of adversity.

Disaster Recovery, on the other hand, is focused specifically on restoring IT infrastructure and data after a disaster has occurred. This could involve recovering lost data, restoring systems and networks, and ensuring that IT operations can resume as quickly as possible. Disaster Recovery planning typically involves creating backup systems, implementing data recovery procedures, and testing these plans regularly to ensure they are effective.  Both are critical components of a comprehensive risk management strategy and should be integrated into an organization’s overall resilience planning efforts.

Just like backups, which are a crucial part of Disaster Recovery, these plans can become very quickly out of date and useless, unless reviewed periodically and tested to see if they actually work.

7.        Vulnerabilities and Threats 

A vulnerability is a flaw or weakness in an asset’s design, implementation, or operation and management that could be exploited by a threat. A threat is a potential for a threat agent to exploit a vulnerability.  A simple way to explain this is that a vulnerability is the inability to resist a hazard or to respond when a disaster has occurred. For instance, people who live on plains are more vulnerable to floods than people who live higher up.  The threat is the flood itself.

IT risks and vulnerabilities are the potential threats and weaknesses that can affect the performance, security and reliability of your business function and processes. They can have serious consequences for your business goals, customer satisfaction, and competitive advantage.

Identifying vulnerabilities to your cyber security assets and then identifying the threat to those assets in terms of the vulnerability being exploited, informs your risk and enables you to assign a value to it.  Financial value can be assigned to the risk score if you so wish.  You then apply controls to bring the risk down to an acceptable level, starting with the Very High risks, and then bringing them down to whatever is acceptable to you.  That acceptable level, known as the risk appetite, will vary business to business, risk to risk.

8. Supply Chain Security? 

In short, a supply chain attack is a cyber-attack that seeks to damage an organisation by targeting less-secure elements in the supply chain.

An example of such an attack was published by NCSC and points out that many modern businesses outsource their data to third party companies which aggregate, store, process, and broker the information, sometimes on behalf of clients in direct competition with one another.

Such sensitive data is not necessarily just about customers, but could also cover business structure, financial health, strategy, and exposure to risk. In the past, firms dealing with high profile mergers and acquisitions have been targeted. In September 2013, several networks belonging to large data aggregators were reported as having been compromised.

A small botnet was observed exfiltrating information from the internal systems of numerous data stores, through an encrypted channel, to a botnet controller on the public Internet. The highest profile victim was a data aggregator that licenses information on businesses and corporations for use in credit decisions, business-to-business marketing, and supply chain management. While the attackers may have been after consumer and business data, fraud experts suggested that information on consumer and business habits and practices was the most valuable.

The victim was a credit bureau for numerous businesses, providing “knowledge-based authentication” for financial transaction requests. This supply chain compromise enabled attackers to access valuable information stored via a third party and potentially commit large scale fraud.

NCSC also cited what is known as a watering hole attack, which works by identifying a website that’s frequented by users within a targeted organisation, or even an entire sector, such as defence, government, or healthcare. That website is then compromised to enable the distribution of malware.

The attacker identifies weaknesses in the main target’s cyber security, then manipulates the watering hole site to deliver malware that will exploit these weaknesses.

The malware may be delivered and installed without the target realising (called a ‘drive by’ attack) but given the trust the target is likely to have in the watering hole site, it can also be a file that a user will consciously download without realising what it really contains. Typically, the malware will be a Remote Access Trojan (RAT), enabling the attacker to gain remote access to the target’s system.

If you are in someones supply chain, then you need to make doubly sure that your security protects your customer as well as yourself.  And conversely, if you are connected electronically to someone who supplies you, are you sure that you are protected from any vulnerability they may have.

KASPERSKY BANNED IN THE US

The US has announced plans to ban the sale of antivirus software made by Russian firm Kaspersky due to its alleged links to the Kremlin (source article https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ceqq7663wd2o).  This shouldn’t have come as a great shock.  In 2017 the Department of Homeland Security banned the anti-virus product from federal networks, and it has long been a target for US regulators.

There have always been some rather vague clouds over Kaspersky.  I well remember going back to 2010//11, working on a major UK Government sensitive project where we had one guy pushing Kaspersky hard, really fighting its corner but it soon became clear that the customer wasn’t going to use it under any circumstances.  But why?  Kaspersky has always scored very high, in fact near perfect scores, when tested independently by AV-TEST, the most trusted source for independent testing. 

Well, it’s all about the problem that it’s Russian owned and to provide a transliteration from Russian, Laboratoriya Kasperskogo.  In the UK it’s operated by a holding company.  Nonetheless the code comes from Russia and that’s going to have a very real impact on the US, especially given it’s almost total breakdown of relations and the ongoing Ukraine conflict.  Only the US Dept of Homeland Security knows whether this is a very real threat to western company’s using this suite of products, or if there’s a political element to it.  Either way, it’s going to damage Kaspersky, totally decimating its sales in the US.

The big question here in the UK, and across Europe and many Asian countries, is, is it safe to use?  In the UK, the British Standards Institute (BSI) has found no evidence of current problems with Kaspersky products.  However, it went on to recommend that its anti-virus products be replaced with alternatives.  Talk about sitting on the fence and damning with faint praise! 

On 29 March the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)  issued refreshed guidance on UK organisations’ use of technology originating from Russian companies, saying it is not at this time necessary, or necessarily wise, to discontinue use of products such as Kaspersky antivirus (AV) products.  That guidance is now nearly 3 months old, and it remains to be seen if it gets updated following the US action.

The judgement that companies will need to make is, whether renewing or looking to replace a current vendor, do we take a risk on Kaspersky?  Having been in this industry for many years, I know that there are lovers out there, of specific products and/or vendors, who will make this a hill to die on, but there are others who will adopt a much more cautious approach.  I don’t expect to see organisations rushing to ditch Kaspersky but I think their sales people, and their resellers, will find new sales and renewals, a real challenge.

Of course I can’t let this pass without a pitch.  So, if you want to take what I say as being tainted by the fact that I re-sell another product, then guilty m’lud, and I’ll take that on the chin.  The product we sell is one that is in heavy use by the US Department of Defense, as well as industries akin, including the nuclear industry.  It’s been pen tested to death and proof can be shown.  It has a unique approach in that it simply stops unauthorised programs from running.  But how?  Data is stored either as non-runnable info data or runnable application programs. Malware is a type of runnable program with undesirable behaviours.  The system uses what is called a Hard Disk Firewall (HDF).  HDF prevents malware infection, stopping malware program files from being stored and run on a computer.  Simply put it takes about a 30 day period to examine your network and end points, identifying what executables are being run and then, working with you, we decide which of those should be whitelisted to ensure your business isn’t impacted in any way, and anything not on the whitelist is blocked from running.  If you want to know more you can contact us on the links below.

Scroll to top