General Security Issues Archives - H2 Cyber Security for SMEs

BRING YOUR OWN DEVICE (BYOD)

This is a subject that, at one time, was pretty much confined to the larger enterprise organisations but largely because of the pandemic, it is gaining popularity within SMEs and is now getting a lot of attention from the National Cyber Security Centre.

So, what is it? Well the idea was to allow employees to use their own devices for work purposes. The thinking was that in this day and age, many employees have developed preferences for what they use. So whilst many will stick to Microsoft, others may prefer an Android or Apple tablet, whilst others still may prefer a MacBook or Chromebook. There’s a wide choice these days.

But what do we mean by work purposes? It can mean anything from accessing your emails, which most of us do on our phones, to accessing critical services and applications. And this makes it a potentially complex issue.

The pandemic brought with it many issues that needed swift resolutions and now, it’s not uncommon to visit companies that have allowed their staff to continue to work from home often because the cost savings in office accommodation are very beneficial, and some have allowed staff to use their own preferred devices when working, including connecting to the company network and/or cloud services, remotely.

For just about all SMEs, this has started from a position of necessity. But like many such events, if it seems to be working, it rapidly becomes the norm and in creeps a complacency that it’s actually all OK.

BYOD solutions need to be planned and thought through. And pretty much the same as most things, particularly risk based assessments, what you need to do really depends on your organisation. You need to ask some questions:

Is there anything that needs to be done from the office that cannot be done by home workers?
Are there functions which employees need to do, that requires the company to have visibility and management of, and is there anything that doesn’t?
What do my employees need to do?
How can we balance what employees do that also involves your need to protect data and their privacy (DPA2018)? They are after all, using their own device.

Above all you need a well thought through and comprehensive strategy, which, while offering flexibility and potential cost savings, recognises and deals with several security implications that organisations must address to ensure sensitive data and systems remain secure. Below are the key concerns:

a. Data Security

Data Leakage: Employees’ personal devices may lack adequate protections, increasing the risk of unauthorised access or accidental data leaks.
Loss or Theft of Devices: Personal devices may not have encryption enabled, making sensitive corporate data vulnerable if the device is lost or stolen.
Uncontrolled Sharing: Employees might unknowingly share corporate data via apps or cloud services outside the organisation’s control.

b. Malware and Cyber Threats

Insecure Devices: Personal devices might not have up-to-date antivirus software, firewalls, or operating system patches, making them susceptible to malware or ransomware attacks.
Unverified Applications: Employees may install unauthorised or malicious applications that could compromise corporate networks.

c. Network Security

Untrusted Connections: BYOD devices may connect to public Wi-Fi networks, exposing them to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks that could jeopardise corporate data.
Device Spoofing: An attacker could mimic a BYOD device to gain unauthorised access to the network.

d. Compliance Risks

Regulatory Violations: BYOD policies may lead to data handling practices that violate regulations like GDPR or PCI DSS if personal devices aren’t properly managed.
Audit Challenges: Tracking and demonstrating compliance can become difficult with non-standardised, user-managed devices.

e. Access Control

Weak Authentication: Personal devices may not support strong authentication mechanisms, increasing the risk of unauthorised access.
Lack of Segmentation: Employees’ devices may access both corporate and personal systems, creating potential crossover risks.

f. Insufficient Visibility

Limited Monitoring: Organisations may lack full visibility into personal devices, making it harder to detect breaches or policy violations.
Shadow IT: Employees might use unauthorised apps or services that bypass official security controls.

g. Employee Turnover

Data Retention: When an employee leaves, ensuring the removal of corporate data from their personal devices can be challenging.
Device Ownership: Legal and practical issues might arise when attempting to enforce data wiping on personal devices.

Mitigation Strategies

To address these risks, organisations adopting BYOD should:

Implement Mobile Device Management (MDM) or Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions.
Enforce strong authentication, such as multi-factor authentication (MFA).
Require device encryption and ensure compliance through regular checks.
Use some form of file separation to ensure separate corporate data from personal data.
Deploy a zero-trust security model with conditional access controls.
Establish clear policies and training to educate employees on BYOD security best practices.

By proactively addressing these risks, organisations can leverage the benefits of BYOD while maintaining robust security.

Remote Working and Encryption

This is a subject that I tend to jump on every so often, because it’s one that people just don’t seem to get. Whether it’s working from home, from a coffee shop, airport, railway station etc, there is this perception that it’s safe because you’re connected via VPN, or perhaps some other form of application which encrypts data in transit. Well, let’s explore this subject a bit further.

There is no doubt that the propensity for working from home, or other remote locations, since COVID has introduced some very difficult, or at least challenging, security vulnerabilities into your network. For instance, prior to the pandemic, when you were 100% office based (except perhaps some mobile salespeople), your local IT provider will have almost certainly set up what we called the bastion security model. Ie, like a castle, a bastion, you had a wall around you, and for belt and braces, you also had a moat. The gateway was robust, had a drawbridge and portcullis, or let’s call it a secure firewall and anti-malware system. Everything was locked up inside and nice and secure (in fact it probably wasn’t but that’s for another day).

Whilst Microsoft didn’t invent the term the ‘new normal’, they were the first, I believe, to apply it to IT, following the enforced change in working practices brought about by the pandemic. Many companies have embraced this new normal and have settled into some form of hybrid working. Of course, this is nothing new, it’s been ‘a thing’ for years now, certainly regarding corporate organisations. The real change came about in SMEs for whom it really was quite revolutionary. Corporate bodies will have spent a lot of money on a variety or remote access systems to keep their data secure, whilst SMEs not only had to rush unprepared because of the pandemic, but they simply didn’t have the budget to employ more secure connections.

What the pandemic has done is change that, or perhaps arguably, accelerated the change to a more distributed way of working, already underway in corporate organisations but now common amongst SMEs. What does that mean for us? Firstly, we have to re-think how we are going to work. We start from a position where we still have preexisting tech, such as VPNs and whole disk encryption, to tackle modern and evolving issues.

So, what about VPNs? What are they? A VPN, or Virtual Private Network, is a service that creates a secure, encrypted connection between your device and the internet. This private “tunnel” protects your data and hides your IP address, effectively masking your online identity and activity. It works by allowing you to connect to the internet via an encrypted tunnel to a VPN server, which then forwards your requests to the website or service you’re accessing. The benefits are that it protects your data from being accessed by hackers or eavesdroppers, especially on public WIFI. It masks your IP address and replaces it with one from the VPN server, so it’s harder for websites, advertisers, or even your ISP (Internet Service Provider) to track your online activity. It’s particularly useful when working from insecure public WIFI but should also be used when working from home.

VPNs are available as standalone apps and more often now, incorporated into other applications, particularly those used to connect to cloud services.

All good, right? Well yes, anything that helps secure your data is a good thing. But like all good things it has some downsides. A VPN does help protect data in transit over an insecure WIFI connection by encrypting the data you send and receive over the internet. This means that if you’re connected to an insecure WIFI network (like in a coffee shop or airport), the VPN will prevent anyone from intercepting and reading your internet traffic.

However, a VPN does not protect data stored locally on your laptop. Files or personal information saved directly on your hard drive are not protected by the VPN. To secure the data on your laptop, you may want to consider using additional protections such as some sort of full disk encryption (BitLocker for Windows or FileVault for macOS are standard with the operating systems) to protect data at rest. And you should be using strong passwords and multi-factor authentication.

So, what I’m saying here is that should someone manage to gain access to your end point ie your laptop, desktop, even your phone, then your VPN is not going to protect you.

Let’s now talk a bit more about Bitlocker and FileVault. BitLocker, Microsoft’s disk encryption tool, provides robust security when configured properly (but I make the point here that it’s often not only incorrectly configured but isn’t even in use, making it pointless). And, like all encryption systems, its security depends on several factors, including the version of BitLocker, implementation practices, and potential vulnerabilities in the system environment. Bitlocker uses strong encryption, either AES 128 or 256 Bit, both of which are considered secure.

FileVault is the MacOS equivalent of Bitlocker (roughly) and is considered secure and built into the MacOS and is very easy to switch on. It too offers full disk encryption using AES 128 or 256 Bit. Once again though it is often not in use by Mac users, many of whom don’t even know it exists.

Are there any drawbacks to whole disk encryption? Will it protect me against things like ransomware? Whole disk encryption is designed to secure data at rest by preventing unauthorised access to data on a physical storage device (e.g., in case the device is lost or stolen). The problem is that once the machine is booted up, using the correct authentication, the disk is unencrypted, allowing you access to the data. So, the answer to the specific question re ransomware is that such an attack is typically not mitigated by this kind of encryption because:

Ransomware Operates at the OS Level: Once a device is booted up and the encrypted disk is unlocked (usually via user login), ransomware can interact with files just like any other software. Since the operating system has access to the data, the ransomware does as well.

Ransomware Encrypts Data Independently: Ransomware generally works by encrypting the contents of individual files or directories (not the entire disk), effectively “locking” them within the already-decrypted environment. BitLocker, or any full disk encryption, won’t stop ransomware from doing this, as it doesn’t interfere with file operations once the system is unlocked.

No Version Control or Rollback: Whole disk encryption solutions don’t provide a way to revert to previous file versions or recover from ransomware encryption. This is where regular backups (stored separately from the network) play a critical role in protecting against ransomware.

You’re being careful, you have a VPN, and you have Bitlocker configured on your laptop. You’re feeling nice and secure and have no issues using the local Coffee Shop or your home WIFI. Your connection to your cloud service is secure and all your data in transit is encrypted. Even your email is going via a secure tunnel. All is good with the world. Except of course that as soon as you logged on your whole disk encryption is switched off and your data is vulnerable even before you transmit it. Any data you download to work on likewise becomes vulnerable as soon as it lands on your laptop.

Earlier I argued that VPNs were old tech being used to combat modern threats and a different way of working. Does that mean that I think the VPN is no longer useful and is going out of style. No of course not, VPNs have a very real place in our security architectures and that won’t go away anytime soon. But they, like the vulnerabilities they are trying to mitigate, have to evolve and keep pace with present day and future realities.

VPNs, whether stand alone, or incorporated into another technology are great at securing data in transit. What about your data at rest? The best VPN in the world won’t protect you from someone who is determined to get in and steal your data or install ransomware. The problem for SMEs is the same that it pretty much always has been. Cost. Can they afford a system that will protect their data and stop it being lost, stolen or ransomed.

What has long been needed is a simple, flexible and intuitive security solution. We believe we have found such a system that protects your company against all known threats, and puts you firmly in control of your data, working automatically 24/7 to identify and safeguard your sensitive information.

Delivering multi-level protection, it provides real time control over all sensitive data. You can identify and solve every problem with a single click of your mouse! Instead of whole disk encryption, which is decrypted as soon as you log on, it provides file level encryption which allows authorised users access but no one else. But it does more, it locates all your data, allows you to decide what is, and what is not, sensitive, and provides subscription pricing for a fully managed solution.

It’s a system that is designed specifically for SMEs and is therefore appropriate to you, and affordable. To prove that we offer a 30-day free trial so that you can see it for yourself. Check it out at https://hah2.co.uk/gdpr-data-protection/.

Ransomware and the risk to SMEs

There’s a lot of FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt), going around about Ransomware, and it has to be said that a lot of it comes from cyber security companies. But amongst the rocks there are some very real diamonds that need the publicity. There is a very real difference between genuine information and propaganda. I hope what I do is spread information.

There is a prevailing feeling amongst small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that they are not a desirable target for Ransomware and it’s therefore not a problem for them. However, that’s simply not true and they are increasingly vulnerable to ransomware attacks, with recent trends showing a notable rise in these incidents among smaller businesses. Several factors influence the likelihood of SMEs being targeted:

Widespread Targeting: SMEs are often viewed as “soft targets” because they may lack the advanced cybersecurity defences of larger corporations. Attackers assume that smaller businesses may have fewer resources dedicated to security, making them easier to compromise.
Increasing Ransomware Attacks Overall: Ransomware attacks globally have been on the rise, and attackers have shifted their focus to include not only large enterprises but also smaller organisations across various sectors. This is often due to the lower cost of launching ransomware campaigns, allowing attackers to spread wide nets with mass phishing campaigns and automated attacks.
Financial and Operational Impact: Many SMEs are attractive to attackers because the disruption from ransomware can be financially devastating for them. SMEs may feel greater pressure to pay the ransom to restore operations quickly, fearing the loss of business or reputation if the downtime persists.
Underinvestment in Cybersecurity: SMEs often underinvest in cybersecurity due to budget constraints, lack of expertise, or other business priorities. This underinvestment can lead to outdated software, limited employee training on cybersecurity best practices, and weaker defences that attackers can exploit.

Likelihood and Statistics

High Likelihood: Studies show that more than half of SMEs have experienced a cyberattack in the last year, with ransomware being one of the most common types of attack.
Small Business Victimisation: According to a 2022 survey by the Cyber Readiness Institute, nearly 60% of small businesses were targeted by cyberattacks, and a significant portion of these involved ransomware.
Increasing Cost: For many SMEs, the average cost of a ransomware attack, including downtime, lost revenue, and recovery expenses, can be as high as £50 to a £100K, making the financial impact severe and sometimes unmanageable without external assistance.

Key Risk Factors for SMEs

Lack of Security Awareness and Training: Employees at SMEs may be less well trained on cybersecurity threats, increasing the risk of phishing and social engineering attacks that lead to ransomware.
Lack of Backup and Recovery Plans: SMEs may not have effective data backup or disaster recovery strategies, making them more susceptible to extended downtime or paying the ransom.
Weak Network and Endpoint Security: Limited resources often mean that SMEs may not have enterprise-grade firewalls, intrusion detection, or antivirus solutions, leaving systems exposed to exploitation. They also struggle with the distributed work practice (office, home etc) that has happened since COVID.
Encryption: Data is often unencrypted on end point machines.

Reducing the Risk

While the risk is high, SMEs can take measures to reduce the likelihood and impact of a ransomware attack:

Implementing Regular Backups: Ensuring data backups are frequent, secured, and tested for restoration can significantly reduce the impact of an attack.
Employee Training: Conducting regular training to recognize phishing and social engineering can help employees avoid common attack vectors.
Monitoring: No or inadequate monitoring of their data and systems, including home and other remote workers.
Endpoint and Network Security: Investing in antivirus software, firewalls, and network monitoring can improve defences.
Cyber Insurance: Purchasing cyber insurance can help mitigate financial losses associated with an attack.
Data encryption.

In summary, while SMEs face a high likelihood of ransomware attacks, increasing awareness, preparation, and proactive defence measures can substantially reduce both the risk and the impact of an attack.

What is the impact of a Ransomware Attack?

Ransomware can have devastating effects on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Here are some of the key impacts:

Financial Losses

Ransom Payment: If SMEs decide to pay the ransom (which is not generally recommended), this can result in significant, sometimes crippling, costs.
Operational Downtime: Even if no ransom is paid, businesses often experience significant downtime as they attempt to recover systems, which can halt revenue generation and lead to lost sales.
Recovery Costs: In addition to the ransom, SMEs incur expenses related to data recovery, IT support, and forensic investigation. Often, additional security solutions are needed to prevent future attacks.

Loss of Data

Data Encryption or Destruction: Ransomware can lead to the permanent loss of critical data if files are corrupted or remain encrypted after an attack.
Loss of Sensitive Information: SMEs may lose access to sensitive customer or business data, leading to gaps in operational records or strategic plans.

Reputational Damage

Loss of Customer Trust: Ransomware attacks, especially if customer data is exposed or operations are disrupted, can damage customer confidence. Many SMEs rely on personal relationships, and a ransomware incident can harm these relationships.
Brand Damage: Businesses often struggle to rebuild trust, and reputation damage may deter new clients and weaken partnerships with vendors or other business partners.

Legal and Regulatory Consequences

Compliance Violations: If SMEs operate in regulated sectors (like finance, healthcare, or legal services), a data breach can lead to violations of regulations like GDPR, resulting in fines and other penalties.
Legal Liabilities: Affected customers or vendors may pursue legal action if sensitive data is compromised, adding further financial strain.

Operational Disruptions

Halting of Services: For many SMEs, especially those without a strong IT infrastructure, ransomware can paralyse day-to-day operations.
Long Recovery Times: SMEs often lack the same level of IT resources as larger enterprises, so restoring full operational capacity after an attack can take weeks or months.

Employee Productivity and Morale

Reduced Productivity: During and after a ransomware attack, employees may be unable to work if they lack access to necessary files, email, or software.
Psychological Impact: The stress and uncertainty from a cyberattack can lead to anxiety or frustration among employees, potentially impacting morale and retention.

Increased Insurance Costs

Higher Cyber Insurance Premiums: Cyber insurance costs tend to increase significantly for companies that have experienced ransomware attacks. Additionally, insurers may demand proof of enhanced security measures to continue providing coverage.

Pressure to Strengthen Cybersecurity Measures

Increased Security Costs: Post-incident, SMEs often must invest in more robust cybersecurity infrastructure, including advanced threat detection, backup solutions, and employee training.
Ongoing Monitoring Needs: Ransomware may prompt SMEs to adopt more rigorous monitoring and endpoint protection tools, leading to continuous IT spending.

Ransomware attacks can be particularly harmful to SMEs because they often have fewer resources for cybersecurity, and a single attack can have a prolonged impact. Many SMEs lack a full-time IT staff or robust data backup protocols, which can compound the impact. Consequently, proactive measures, such as employee training, regular data backups, and up-to-date cybersecurity defences, are critical to reducing the likelihood and impact of ransomware attacks on SMEs.

What Do SME Owners and Directors Want From Cyber Security?

I wrote a post earlier this week exploring what SME owners and directors really care about when it comes to cyber security! Do they really care about the how the latest technological solutions work? Do they really care about the scare stories, or at least, do they really think that they apply to them. Oh, they might have a sneaky suspicion that it could be a problem but is it on their mind enough for them to do something about it.

The argument was made that this is especially true in an economic downturn when they are focused on costs, even more than they normally are. They want robust cyber security solutions that don’t cost an arm and a leg. And what they don’t want is jargon and tech speak that they feel is aimed at bamboozling them with science in order to convince them they should buy something that they don’t actually need.

We are believers that what is needed is simplicity. SMEs are looking for user-friendly security measures that don’t require a PhD in Cyber Science. They don’t want jargon or even industry metrics. Remember the KISS principle – Keep It Simple Stupid.

Of course they are going to have a focus, and you need to understand what is important to them and what isn’t. That will depend on the nature of their business to a great extent. Whilst there are commonalities regardless of the vertical they work in, there will always be differences, some big, some more subtle, that will impact any cyber security solutioning.

Nowadays many SMEs are increasingly aware of cybersecurity risks, but a significant number still underestimate the importance of cybersecurity risk management. SMEs often face unique challenges in this area due to limited resources, competing priorities, and often a lack of expertise not just in their organisation but also in the IT support company’s they use. Here are some insights into the current landscape:

Growing Awareness: SMEs have started to recognise that they are just as likely to be targeted by cyber threats as larger companies, partly due to high-profile ransomware attacks and data breaches affecting businesses of all sizes. As a result, awareness is rising, especially as more businesses transition to digital platforms and remote work, which increases exposure to cyber risks.

Resource Constraints: For many SMEs, the cost of robust cybersecurity measures can be prohibitive. They often lack dedicated IT and cybersecurity teams, which makes it challenging to implement and maintain comprehensive security protocols. Cybersecurity solutions can be expensive, so SMEs may prioritise short-term operational needs over what they might perceive as longer-term security investments.

Risk Perception and Underestimation: Some SMEs mistakenly believe they are too small to be targeted by cybercriminals, assuming that attackers primarily focus on large corporations. However, this “security by obscurity” mindset has been proven false, as attackers often view SMEs as easier targets due to their weaker defences.

Impact of a Breach on SMEs: Unlike larger companies, SMEs are less likely to recover from a significant cyber incident. A data breach or ransomware attack can be devastating, leading to financial losses, reputational damage, and even closure. Despite this, many SMEs may not fully understand the potential scale of these consequences.

Compliance and Regulatory Pressure: With increasing data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR, PCI), SMEs are under more pressure to adopt better cybersecurity practices to remain compliant. This has led to greater awareness among some SMEs, especially those handling sensitive data like healthcare, finance, or customer and payment information.

Cybersecurity Awareness Training and Culture: Even when SMEs implement some cybersecurity measures, they may lack the necessary employee training and risk management practices that foster a security-focused culture. Human error remains a leading cause of data breaches, so SMEs need to prioritize employee awareness and training.

In summary, while awareness of cybersecurity risk management is growing among SMEs, gaps remain, particularly around adequate investment, robust risk perception, and ongoing management of cybersecurity threats. Cybersecurity can seem overwhelming for small businesses, but as the digital landscape continues to evolve, understanding and addressing these risks is becoming essential for SME survival and growth.

Is Protective Monitoring Necessary for an SME?

I’ve talked about protective monitoring in the past but there is still some misperceptions about it, particularly amongst SMEs. Probably first and foremost is that it is way too expensive, which leads to thinking that it’s not for them and is much more of a nice to have than a necessity. I thought I’d take a bit of a deeper dive into this.

So, what is it?

Protective monitoring in cyber defence is a systematic approach to continuously observing and analysing an organisation’s digital environment to detect, prevent, and respond to security threats. It involves gathering and analysing data about network traffic, system activity, and user behaviours to identify potential vulnerabilities or malicious activities. Here’s a breakdown of its key components and purposes:

For a small or medium-sized enterprise (SME), implementing cyber protective monitoring is crucial for a variety of reasons. This proactive approach can be the difference between quickly identifying and mitigating threats or facing significant damage from a cyber-attack. Here are key reasons why SMEs should consider cyber protective monitoring:

1. Protection Against Data Breaches

SMEs often hold sensitive data like customer information, financial records, and intellectual property. Companies like law firms, financial advisors and estate agents, will hold years worth of personal identifiable information as defined by the Data Protection Act, or UK GDPR if you prefer. Protective monitoring helps identify unusual activity within their network, such as unauthorised access or data exfiltration attempts, allowing for swift action to prevent breaches.

This is especially important as SMEs can be perceived as easier targets by cybercriminals compared to larger enterprises with more robust defences.

2. Regulatory Compliance

Many industries have strict regulations around data privacy and cybersecurity, such as GDPR and PCI-DSS. Protective monitoring helps SMEs stay compliant by providing visibility into how data is accessed, used, and secured.

It allows them to maintain audit trails of activity, which are often required to prove compliance during an audit or investigation.

3. Early Threat Detection

Cyber threats are constantly evolving, and attackers are often inside a network for days or weeks before launching an attack (such as ransomware). Protective monitoring enables the detection of anomalous behaviour that could indicate a security threat before it becomes critical.

This helps minimise damage by enabling a faster response to potential threats like malware infections, unauthorized access, or network vulnerabilities.

4. Cost-Effectiveness in the Long Run

While some SMEs may view cyber protective monitoring as an additional cost, it is often more cost-effective than dealing with the fallout of a cyber-attack. The financial impact of a breach includes legal fees, loss of business, damage to reputation, and potential fines from regulatory bodies.

By investing in monitoring, SMEs can save significantly on these potential costs, making it a smart investment, especially now that there are systems specifically designed and costed for SMEs.

5. Building Trust with Clients and Partners

Customers and business partners expect their data to be handled securely. An SME with strong cybersecurity practices, including protective monitoring, can build trust and demonstrate its commitment to data security.

This can serve as a competitive advantage, especially when dealing with larger enterprises or industries that prioritise security.

6. Rapid Incident Response

When a security incident occurs, the speed of the response is critical. Cyber protective monitoring provides real-time alerts when suspicious activities are detected, enabling SMEs to quickly isolate affected systems and take necessary actions.

A rapid response can help contain potential damage, maintain business continuity, and limit operational disruptions.

7. Mitigating Insider Threats

Not all cybersecurity risks come from outside the organisation. Insider threats, whether malicious or accidental, can cause significant damage. Protective monitoring can help detect unusual behaviour from employees or contractors, such as unauthorised access to sensitive data or suspicious data transfers.

This allows SMEs to address these issues before they lead to data leaks or other security incidents.

8. Scalability and Adaptability

As SMEs grow, their digital footprint and potential vulnerabilities expand as well. Cyber protective monitoring solutions can scale alongside the business, ensuring that security measures remain effective even as new systems, networks, and applications are added.

This adaptability makes it easier for SMEs to adjust their cybersecurity strategy as their needs change, without a complete overhaul of their security infrastructure.

9. Insights for Better Decision-Making

Beyond just identifying threats, protective monitoring can provide valuable insights into network usage and performance. SMEs can leverage this data to make better strategic decisions regarding their IT infrastructure, such as identifying redundant systems or optimising network resources.

It can also highlight areas that require further security investments, helping prioritise spending on cybersecurity.

10. Improving Overall Cybersecurity Posture

Cyber protective monitoring is a key part of a broader cybersecurity strategy. By continuously monitoring and analysing network activities, SMEs can better understand their vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.

This helps create a culture of security within the organisation, where cybersecurity is not just an afterthought but an ongoing priority.

Overall, cyber protective monitoring provides visibility, control, and peace of mind for SMEs, helping them navigate the complex and ever-changing landscape of cyber threats. By taking a proactive stance, they can protect their assets, maintain customer trust, and ensure long-term resilience against cyber-attacks.

Protective monitoring is not just for corporate organisations, but is for everyone, especially now that there are systems and services designed especially for SMEs and priced accordingly. Don’t leave it until it’s too late. Playing catch up and fixing problems after the event, is always much more expensive that taking a pro-active stance.

To learn more about the protective monitoring managed solutions we provide please click here https://www.hah2.co.uk/

Cyber Resilience – what it means and just as importantly, what it doesn’t mean

Cyber resilience can mean different things to different people, depending upon their priorities, their perception of cyber security and the business they are in. This means that there are a lot of misconceptions about what it means, and I’m sure I’ll get some disagreeing with what I write here. And that’s OK, because it really can depend on your situation as I’ve said above. Essentially though it refers to an organisation’s ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from cyber incidents, ensuring that critical operations continue despite attacks, failures, or unexpected events. Unlike cybersecurity, which focuses mainly on preventing attacks, cyber resilience combines prevention with the capability to withstand and adapt to adverse conditions, even if breaches or disruptions occur.

It encompasses five main aspects:

Identify: Understanding what an attack or scam might look like.
Protection: Implementing strong security measures to prevent cyberattacks and minimise vulnerabilities.
Detection: Quickly identifying and recognising cyber threats or breaches when they occur.
Response: Reacting effectively to contain and mitigate the impact of a cyber incident.
Recovery: Restoring systems and data to normal functioning after an incident, while learning from the event to improve future preparedness.

A cyber-resilient organisation is not only prepared to handle potential attacks but is also structured to adapt, recover, and continue functioning in the face of disruptions. This approach ensures minimal downtime, data loss, and damage to reputation.

Now let’s look at some misconceptions around cyber resilience.

Complete Immunity from Cyber Attacks: Cyber resilience does not mean that an organisation will be entirely immune to cyber threats. Rather, it focuses on minimising the impact and ensuring continuity in the face of such events. No system can be entirely hack proof.
Just Having Strong Cybersecurity: While cybersecurity is a crucial part of cyber resilience, the latter encompasses more than just security measures like firewalls or anti-virus software. It also involves having an effective strategy encompassing sound policies and processes, incident response plans, business continuity plans, and recovery strategies. A purely preventive approach, without considering recovery, does not constitute true cyber resilience.
A One-Time Effort: Cyber resilience is not a one-time project or a static state. It requires continuous assessment, updating of policies, and adaptation to new threats. It’s an iterative process of improvement and adjustment to maintain resilience against evolving threats.
Quick and Easy Recovery: While resilience involves the ability to recover, it does not guarantee that recovery will be quick or without challenges. It means that recovery is possible, but it might still take time and effort to restore normal operations depending on the severity of the incident.
An IT Department’s Responsibility Alone: Cyber resilience is not just about technical solutions managed by the IT department. It involves a holistic approach, including organisational culture, employee training, risk management strategies, and coordination across different business functions. It’s an organisational-wide commitment. In a nutshell, it’s a business issue, not an IT issue.

Understanding what cyber resilience is not helps organisations better align their strategies towards truly being prepared for and able to recover from cyber incidents.

Don’t get bogged down in this though, don’t think it’s way too difficult and not really something that an SME for instance, can afford to do. It’s a matter of scale and there are some things that a corporate business will need to do, that an SME doesn’t need to do, or perhaps can scale down.

Help is at hand and if you want to talk this over then do please give me a call.

Can Remote Working be Dangerous?

Well frankly, yes it can be dangerous. There is a myriad of issues which have sprung out of remote working since COVID, with many SMEs, now operating a hybrid working scenario, although in my experience, certainly amongst my customer base, there are very few going 100% remote.

Businesses of all sizes have been forced to transform their operations to support remote work and by and large have done well, but not without many challenges—including video conferencing burn out, (along with wishing they’d taken out shares in Zoom!!), and a yearning to work together in person again, someday. We all realise that group working, face to face, is often necessary not just for efficiency, but because we are social animals. Experience has taught many businesses many things, but strangely, to my mind at least, many have simply not grasped the potentially dire consequences in terms of cyber security and data protection.

A distributed work environment i.e., personnel spread around various locations, office, home working, even the local coffee shop, creates critical challenges and new security threats as a result. The speed with which this has happened has meant that many simply did not take this into account and if they did, thought, well, this is temporary, and it won’t matter in the long run. Well perhaps, but as many are now finding, there have been advantages to home working, not least a lowering of costs in terms of how much office space is needed to carry out the business function. Many are now looking at Hybrid working i.e., from home with a day or two in the office during the week. There are pros and cons to this outside of the scope of this article, and businesses will have to make their own judgements, but one thing is clear and that is that businesses need to understand the risks now inherent in distributed work and need to get better at cyber security and data protection, in those environments.

Employees when remote working, are at much greater risk than those in offices. Since home connections are less secure, cybercriminals have an easier entry into the company network. Furthermore, the explosion of various online tools, solutions, and services for collaboration and productivity tend to have the bare minimum of security default setting, and updates from third-party vendors can change security preferences and be easily overlooked.

Phishing becomes an even greater threat to home workers simply because, in an office environment, they have access to colleagues and managers, who they can approach for advice and guidance. This is much harder to replicate with remote workers, especially those who may not be particularly tech savvy and who may not wish to become ‘burdensome’ to their co-workers.

Ransomware also enjoys an advantage in the remote working model. If their connection to the company is blocked, it is more difficult for workers to get assistance from the right experts and authorities. And since trust levels are lower when working from home, some workers will be concerned that they have “done something wrong” and so may be more reluctant to seek help. While this risk can be addressed by increased training, as well as messaging that vigilance and involving corporate IT will be rewarded, it can still be an uphill battle.

One of the biggest dangers I still see day to day is the dangers inherent in working from the local coffee shop. This is a subject that I tend to jump on every so often, because it’s one that people just don’t seem to get. Whenever I drop into a coffee shop for my caffeine infusion, there are usually at least a couple of people with their laptops open, working away on business issues. I could see open spreadsheets (and easy to read if you were sitting behind them), and all have their email open. They are often on a video call, and I can often hear all their side of the conversation, annoying enough for other café users but they are oblivious of the data being released into the wild.

If you are among those free Wi-Fi lovers, there’s bad news for you… your online privacy and security is at risk, if you rely on the weak to non-existent Wi-Fi security protocolsat coffee shops. This means that you could be exposed to various threats such as identity theft which has over 15 million cases each year, data theft/breaches, introducing malware to your business network and that of your customers/suppliers. This list is not exhaustive.

Free or public Wi-Fi’s are hotspots for hackers and data snoopers who want to steal your private data or financial information. It is easy for hackers to do that nowadays. You will be surprised to know the different ways hackers can compromise your device or your private information and why you shouldn’t rely on Wi-Fi security at coffee shops as they come with a lot of risk.

Unencrypted Data Exposure: If the Wi-Fi network is not encrypted, your sensitive information (e.g., passwords, emails, and financial data) can be intercepted by hackers using packet-sniffing tools.

Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Hackers can position themselves between you and the network, intercepting and potentially altering the communication between your device and the server, leading to data theft or manipulation.

Fake Hotspots (Evil Twin Attacks): Cybercriminals may create a rogue Wi-Fi network that mimics the coffee shop’s legitimate network. If you connect to it, they can access all the data transmitted over the connection.

Malware Injection: Open networks can allow hackers to inject malware or viruses onto your device, which can lead to long-term breaches of your data or systems.

Session Hijacking: Attackers can intercept your session cookies, giving them access to your accounts, even if you’re using secure websites.

To mitigate these risks, use a VPN, avoid sensitive transactions, and ensure your firewall and antivirus software are active. Although a VPN may not save your data if it’s stored on your laptop.

We are huge supporters of Cyber Awareness training for managers and staff, arguing that this is no longer a ‘nice to have’ and is now very much a necessity. In fact, it is arguably the biggest quick win, giving the greatest potential return on investment that there is. Of course, this means that companies must understand what their threats, vulnerabilities and risks are, to assess exactly what training is going to be the most effective.

But that alone won’t save you from a dedicated hacker. We need to look at some more technical solutions to help you beat attacks. Here at H2 we have researched and developed services using Software as a Service (SaaS), which, being cloud based, work wherever you are, office, home or coffee shop, and encrypts your most sensitive data whether on your machine, or in transit.

If you feel a no obligation chat about this would be helpful, give us a call.

How are Mid-Market Businesses Faring Regarding Cyber Security

Mid-sized businesses are under as much pressure to keep the organisation secure as are the larger corporates but without the deep pockets that those larger corporates have. Because of this they are also fast becoming the easy target that we often view small businesses as being, but with a larger payload for the cyber-criminal. In fact, in 2023, 59% of medium sized businesses suffered a cyber-attack or data breach in the UK.

The biggest issue facing mid-market organisations is balancing limited resources with the growing complexity and volume of cyber threats. The lack of resources is compounded by an overall dearth of cyber-security skills in general, and a real lack of skills in mid-sized companies and the IT companies they often outsource to. Key aspects of this challenge include:

1. Resource Constraints: Mid-market organisations typically lack the budget and personnel to implement robust, enterprise-level cyber-security solutions. They may not have dedicated security teams, forcing IT departments to manage cyber-security alongside other duties. This dilutes skills and leaves them vulnerable to sophisticated attacks.

2. Rising Threat Sophistication: Cyber-criminals are increasingly using advanced tools and techniques, such as ransomware, phishing, and supply chain attacks, now enhanced with AI, which often outpace the security capabilities of mid-sized businesses. These organisations are prime targets because they are often seen as less protected than larger enterprises but more valuable than small businesses.

3. Compliance and Regulatory Challenges: As regulations like GDPR, FCA, and industry specific mandates grow, mid-market companies struggle to meet compliance requirements without the same level of support and infrastructure that larger organisations can afford.

4. Lack of Cyber security Awareness: Employees at mid-market organisations may not have adequate training on cyber-security best practices, making them vulnerable to human error, such as falling for phishing scams or weak password practices.

5. Third-Party Risks: Mid-market companies often rely on third-party vendors for various services, but they may lack the resources to thoroughly vet these vendors’ security postures, leading to vulnerabilities in their supply chain.

Addressing these issues requires mid-market organisations to prioritise cyber-security despite resource constraints, invest in scalable security solutions, and foster a strong security culture throughout the organisation.

There is a very real difficulty in breaking out of this cycle. The mind set of most board members is to focus on the core business and keep costs to an absolute minimum. Costs are important in a mid-sized business, especially one where margins may be tight. IT budgets will focus on items, both hardware and software, that are required to keep the revenue flowing and its cyber-security solutions, including data protection solutions, are often seen as nebulous because there is no obvious return on investment. CIOs/CISOs/IT Directors are often left trying to prove a negative, ie we haven’t had any security issues because we have protections in place, as opposed to we haven’t had any security issues therefore we don’t need to budget for protections. It’s a years old argument that never seems to have a resolution.

However, breaking out of this cycle, this thought process, is very important. Cyber threats, what we refer to as the threat landscape, are evolving at a frightening pace, often enhanced using AI. This will further compound any argument about budget simply because there is this need to keep pace with the cyber-criminal, and those of us in this industry know that we have always been playing catch up.

So how do we do it? Not an easy answer but one way that some mid-sized organisations are now looking at is managed security solutions. The provision of SOC (Security Operations Centre) solutions, in a shared way, as we do with cloud services for example, makes managed security more affordable. Many of the large enterprise organisations also make use of managed security solutions for the reasons of cost. On site solutions are not just expensive in terms of hardware and software, but also staffing costs, training etc, can be exorbitant. So, sharing those costs becomes very attractive.

Of course, there is no one size fits all solution and most managed service providers will have a set of services it provides, and do not tailor their services simply because it would make them too complex and expensive to provide, somewhat obviating the whole reason for doing it in the first place.

To make sure that you have the level of protection that you need, then you must do some up front work, maybe getting some consultancy that will save you money in the long run, by getting the protections and levels of service in place that you actually need.

There are several solutions around and organisations that provide them, and I do recommend that you shop around. Some are better than others and the CrowdStrike issue hasn’t done the reputation of managed services much good. Here at H2 we offer solutions for both monitoring your technical estate, your user actions, email, cloud services etc, as well as your data protection issues providing monitoring of any compliances that you may need, including UK GDPR, PCI DSS as an example.

If in doubt give us call, we’d be delighted to chat it over, offer a demo and a FREE trial lasting up to 30 days for the data protection solutions and 14 days for the more technical solution.

Is Cyber Security about Tech or the Business?

It’s simply a fact that many owners, managers, directors etc, believe that cyber security is a technology issue and is best left to those guys in IT who understand that stuff. Here at H2 we spend a lot of time and effort trying to educate C level people, that it really is a business issue, although it has significant input from the techies. It’s a business issue because breaches can have a significant financial and reputational impact. It’s also an IT issue because it involves implementing technical measures to protect systems and data. Effective cyber security requires a collaboration between business leaders and IT professionals to address both the strategic and technical aspects of security.

The crux of the issue though, is that it must be led by the business, and at board level. It requires a strategy to be followed, which is laid down at board level and which is focused on the goals and aspirations of the business, especially when your IT is outsourced. You can outsource your IT, but you can’t outsource your responsibility.

A valid argument is that the proliferation of security tools creates an illusion of safety. Organisations, large and small, often believe that by deploying a firewall, antivirus software and maybe some other tools, such as intrusion detection systems, they are adequately protected. This ignores the fact that such tools are controls put in place to mitigate risks identified and qualified in terms of importance, in a risk assessment and unless the benefits they bring are properly identified, and the solutions placed and configured correctly, they may well not be doing what you think they are doing. This thinking can also introduce significant third-party risks into your domain. The most recent example of this is the CrowdStrike issue which caused so much chaos throughout the globe.

To be fair to most companies in the smaller and mid-market arenas, their focus is on obtaining IT solutions as cost effectively as possible, and with the minimum of support costs. Cost control is vital to most. This means that they are extremely reluctant to spend money on what they see as not being part of their core business. Of course, if they get a cyber-attack or scam, or worse a data breach attracting the attention of the ICO, then their costs trying to fix the issue can easily outstrip any costs in prevention. Unless they have a well thought out risk managed strategy, they are wide open to slick sales pitches which push products. The rub is that in order to have that well thought out strategy, it means spending on what they see as expensive services that can seem somewhat nebulous, not something they can see and feel, and there is that vague feeling that they are being led to do something that really isn’t all that important.

The approach most take is to trust their IT provider to give them the protections they need. Most of these IT providers are what is known as re-sellers, ie they sell other people’s products and will push those products because that’s their business model. What they won’t do is take a risk managed approach which is essential in ensuring that any limited spend on security, limited because of cost constraints, is targeted where it’s needed and will be most effective. In other words, the technological approach taken by most IT support company’s will do half a job at best.

In essence then, if you don’t understand the risks you face, how can ensure that your cyber security strategy and protections are fit for purpose? Risk management is all about helping us to create plans for our future in a deliberate and responsible way. This requires us to explore what could go wrong in an organisation, on a day-to-day basis.

A quote from Bruce Schneier, Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School, goes like this:

‘If you think technology can solve your security problems, then you don’t understand the problems and you don’t understand the technology’.

How do we approach this then? First and foremost, you need to identify the risks that you face. How can you identify that risk and then mitigate it? Taking risks is a part of business. You assess risk every day when doing business. Do you want to do this deal? What happens if it goes not as expected? Do I want to take this person on? Whether you formally undertake a risk assessment or whether you assess that risk informally, you are working out what is appropriate to a level that is consistent with the risk that your organisation is prepared to take. Failure to do that will almost certainly be damaging to your business, perhaps fatally so.

The difference between assessing day to day business risk and assessing risk to cyber assets, is one of understanding. What is a cyber asset? In this context insert the word ‘information’ instead of cyber. It is the information contained within the IT system that is the important asset, not the piece of hardware it is sitting on. You understand your business risk, after all it is your business, but do you understand information risk? Do you have a clear idea of what information assets you have and where they are? Before you answer that think it through. Do you really know where all the data is? OK, you know that you have a server or servers probably in a cloud somewhere (cloud storage and access is a whole other subject) and that somewhere in those servers there is a bunch of data which runs your business. How much of that data has been saved onto staff workstations when they needed it to carry out some work? How much has been copied off somewhere else for what was probably a very good reason at one point? How well is your firewall functioning? Can malware work its way onto the network because the firewall does not have Universal Threat Management installed and can therefore be probing the servers and workstations. And we haven’t even thought about changes in working patterns. How many of your staff now work remotely some or all of the time. I could go on.

How can we be sure where all this information is and how important each bit is to the business? How can we assess this risk to the business, if information is lost or otherwise compromised? What about ransomware, phishing scams etc? The good news is that some of this can now be automated and managed for you at an affordable price and you can even arrange a 14 day totally free trial to assess its effectiveness.

AI and Risk Management – What’s Changed?

The answer to the question posed is, quite simply, nothing, in terms of risk management. The process of analysis of the threats posed to any particular organisation or infrastructure, the assessment of how vulnerable that organisation is to those threats, and the application of controls to bring down the risk to an acceptable level, remains pretty much the same.

Of course, the threat is changing, quite considerably, with billions being invested globally in the field of AI, which is affording huge advances in technology which brings with it great benefits but also new risks which are potentially more dangerous than those associated with current IT systems.

There is guidance coming out from several sources internationally on these risks and how to address them, but the EU has gone one step further and is producing the first comprehensive continental legislation on AI, the EU AI Act. Unlike most countries guidance, it is not voluntary but will become law and has real teeth. It wouldn’t be a shock to find other countries following suite.

The EU AI Act focuses on impacts to the rights, freedoms and safety of the public within the EU but is nevertheless a landmark legislative proposal by the European Union aimed at regulating artificial intelligence across its member states. Proposed in April 2021, the Act seeks to establish a comprehensive legal framework for AI that ensures the technology is developed and used in a way that respects fundamental rights, safety, and democratic values.

Here are the key points of the EU AI Act:

1. Risk-Based Approach

The Act adopts a risk-based classification system that categorises AI systems into four risk levels:

Unacceptable Risk: AI systems deemed harmful (e.g., social scoring by governments) are banned outright.
High Risk: AI systems with significant potential to impact safety, rights, or wellbeing (e.g., biometric identification, critical infrastructure) must meet strict requirements regarding transparency, accuracy, oversight, and documentation.
Limited Risk: Systems with moderate risk must comply with transparency obligations (e.g., AI chatbots must inform users they are interacting with AI).
Minimal Risk: Systems with negligible or no risk (e.g., spam filters, AI in video games) are largely unregulated.

2. High-Risk AI Regulation

For high-risk AI systems, the EU AI Act imposes stringent regulatory requirements. These include:

Thorough risk assessments before deployment.
Ongoing monitoring during use.
Ensuring traceability and transparency in the system’s decision making processes.
Compliance with technical documentation and human oversight standards.

3. Prohibited Practices

Certain AI uses are banned outright because they are considered to violate fundamental rights. Examples include:

Real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces for law enforcement purposes (with some exceptions).
AI systems that exploit vulnerabilities of specific groups, such as children or the elderly.

4. Governance and Enforcement

A new European Artificial Intelligence Board (EAIB) will be created to oversee the implementation of the AI Act. This body will work alongside national regulators to enforce compliance across the EU.

5. Penalties

Non-compliance with the AI Act can result in hefty fines, with penalties of up to €30 million or 6% of global annual turnover, whichever is higher, for serious violations.

6. Promoting Innovation

While the AI Act imposes strict controls on high-risk systems, it also includes provisions to encourage innovation in the AI sector. It proposes the creation of regulatory sandboxes, controlled environments where companies and public institutions can test AI systems under the supervision of regulators before full deployment.

7. Scope

The AI Act has a broad scope, applying not just to companies and institutions based in the EU, but also to non-EU organisations that place AI systems on the European market or whose AI systems affect individuals within the EU.

The EU AI Act is significant because it represents the first major attempt globally to create a legal framework that balances the benefits and risks of AI. It aims to position the EU as a global leader in AI regulation, prioritizing ethical AI development while promoting safety, transparency, and accountability.

As I said earlier, there are other sets of guidance being issued but they are not enforceable and can be adopted in whole or in part or ignored. The US Dept pf Commerce National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) and the UK National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) have issued such guidance. The NIST guidance for example covers Harm to People, Harm to an Organisation and Harm to an Ecosystem. But it remains just guidance. On the upside it is all based on sound risk management and for those of us who have been steeped in that culture, almost for as long as information security has been taken into the IT sphere, that is music to our ears.

If you want to know more or to chat over the issues, drop me a message. I’d be only too pleased. If you are interested in knowing a bit more about risk management then this article might be of interest to you https://hah2.co.uk/still-on-the-subject-of-cyber-resilience/.

General Security Issues