Kevin Hawkins, Author at H2 Cyber Security for SMEs

Remote or Office? The Debate Goes On

Barely a week goes by without the remote working v office-based argument surfaces somewhere, usually it must be said, at the corporate level, although many SME owners remain nervous of it, with others downright against it. My client base appears to be largely OK with a hybrid model of working and only one is 100% remote based, having given up their office.

The COVID pandemic was the catalyst for this with businesses of all sizes being forced to transform their operations to support remote work and by and large have done well, but not without many challenges, including video conferencing burn out, (along with wishing they’d taken out shares in Zoom!!), and a yearning to work together in person again, someday. We all realise that group working, face to face, is often necessary not just for efficiency, but because we are social animals. Experience has taught many businesses many things but are often still struggling with the potentially dire consequences in terms of cyber security and data protection.

I should perhaps mention that in the corporate IT world, where I worked for many years for major system integrators like HP, hot desking and remote working was introduced in the early 2000s and therefore this was no problem for us.

A distributed work environment i.e., personnel spread around various locations, office, home working, even the local coffee shop, creates critical challenges and new security threats as a result. The speed with which this has happened has meant that many simply did not take cyber security issues into account and if they did, thought, well, this is temporary, and it won’t matter in the long run. Well perhaps, but as many are now finding, there have been advantages to home working, not least a lowering of costs in terms of how much office space is needed to carry out the business function. Many are now looking at Hybrid working i.e., from home with a day or two in the office during the week. There are pros and cons to this outside of the scope of this article, and businesses will have to make their own judgements, but one thing is clear and that is that businesses need to understand the risks now inherent in distributed work and need to get better at cyber security and data protection, in those environments.

Employees when remote working, are at much greater risk than those in offices. Since home connections are less secure, cybercriminals have an easier entry into the company network. Furthermore, the explosion of various online tools, solutions, and services for collaboration and productivity tend to have the bare minimum of security default setting, and updates from third-party vendors can change security preferences and be easily overlooked.

Phishing becomes an even greater threat to home workers simply because, in an office environment, they have access to colleagues and managers, who they can approach for advice and guidance. This is much harder to replicate with remote workers, especially those who may not be particularly tech savvy and who may not wish to become ‘burdensome’ to their co-workers.

Ransomware also enjoys an advantage in the remote working model. If their connection to the company is blocked, it is more difficult for workers to get assistance from the right experts and authorities. And since trust levels are lower when working from home, some workers will be concerned that they have “done something wrong” and so may be more reluctant to seek help. While this risk can be addressed by increased training, as well as messaging that vigilance and involving IT support will be rewarded, it can still be an uphill battle.

In a study carried out by Entrust it was clear that many organisations are grasping the concept of cyber awareness training, although there are still too few amongst SMEs that take this on board. Of those who responded to Entrust:

94% said employee training has a positive impact on data security.

95% agreed that they trust remote employees to comply with data security best practices and training.

93% said they felt positive about the impact data security training had on them.

Of course, this was a sampling and only 61% of employees said that their company offered training.

Whatever system of hybrid you are proposing to use, or are using, it is clear that you will need to go beyond baseline security measures. In this case we are almost certainly dealing with baseline protections such as multi-factor authentication, known as MFA or sometimes 2FA, and virtual private networks (VPNs). Both have their place and will be needed.

The Entrust report cites a contradiction here, and it’s one I have also noted. Many company owners/directors say they believe company data is protected with these baseline solutions, yet they also say that home internet connections, leaked sensitive company information and cyber-attacks are their top concerns.

If organisations are going to use hybrid work models successfully over the long term, then they will need to further invest in their security strategy. MFA and VPNs, while important, should be seen as part of a larger strategy for data security in a hybrid work model. Throughout and beyond the pandemic, bad actors have exploited security deficiencies of remote environments such as insecure home tech hardware, poor password hygiene and employee use of unapproved tools.

If you are going to adopt this new normal, or already have adopted it, then the process must start with understanding your risk posture which will inform you of what measures you need to take to secure your data. Below is a link to a short video explaining cyber risk management, at least at a high level.

https://bit.ly/3FdZ6x0

Once you have a clear understanding of what your risks are, then you might like to consider a zero-trust approach to data security.

With employees having the ability to work anywhere in a hybrid environment, the office perimeter is no longer relevant to digital security. Zero Trust frameworks are designed to apply the concept of least privileged access to people, systems and devices, giving these entities only the access they need to fulfil their role and nothing more. Additionally, a Zero Trust approach continually monitors user and device behaviour to identify suspicious patterns and take preventive action, including a step-up authentication challenge.

You may need to consider other protections such as:

Passwordless single sign on involving Privileged Access Management (PAM) to facilitate a Zero Trust approach.

Data Loss Prevention. Whilst a VPN will protect your data in transit, file level encryption ensures that it is protected at rest, at both ends of the tunnel, so that if it does get stolen or otherwise compromised, the impact is severely lessened. There is more information in the short video below.

https://bit.ly/4berDPa

Protective Monitoring. This has long been considered too expensive for an SME. Well, no longer, there is now a system which is effective and affordable and is explained in the video below.

https://bit.ly/3Qy4u0x

If you feel a no obligation chat about this would be helpful, give us a call.

DATA BREACHES

Data breaches continue to make headlines, with corporate incidents grabbing the most attention. A prime example is the Equifax breach, where a server exploit compromised credit reports of over 140 million individuals. The breach took months to discover and resolve, ultimately resulting in Equifax settling with the FTC for a $575 million fine.

Not so long ago the Electoral Commission revealed it fell victim to a “complex cyber-attack,” potentially impacting millions of voters. Unspecified “hostile actors” accessed electoral registers from August 2021 and infiltrated emails and control systems. Alarmingly, this attack went undetected until the following October, leaving sensitive data exposed to cyber criminals for over a year. It’s astonishing that adequate protections were not in place to ensure timely detection and management of the breach.

According to the UK’s NCSC, half of businesses and about a third of charities have reported experiencing some form of cyber security breach or attack. This figure rises to approximately 70% for medium-sized businesses and 74% for large enterprises. Phishing remains a favoured attack method due to its relative simplicity, with AI now generating new variations of old scams.

Most data breaches occur unintentionally, often due to employees making mistakes because they lack awareness of proper procedures. Who bears responsibility? Is it the employee or the employer for not providing sufficient cyber awareness training? That’s open to interpretation.

Here are some notable examples from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO):

• A data controller inadvertently sent paperwork to a child’s birth parents without redacting the adoptive parents’ names and addresses. Upon discovering the breach, the data controller failed to inform the adoptive parents.

• A debt insolvency agent mistakenly emailed a vulnerable new client’s file to a colleague in another department. The colleague quickly deleted the email and alerted the sender about the mistake.

• An employee misplaced his briefcase containing work on an unencrypted laptop and unredacted paper files related to a sensitive court case, which included information on criminal convictions and health details. Initially, he believed both the laptop was encrypted and that the paper files were redacted. After informing his manager, who reported it to IT, the laptop was remotely wiped without initially notifying the ICO. The data controller later reported it after realising the laptop was unencrypted.

• A courier mistakenly delivered medication intended for one patient (Patient A) to another (Patient B). After Patient A complained, the pharmacist recognised the error and arranged for the unopened medication to be picked up and delivered correctly.

• A law firm employee fell victim to a phishing attack after clicking on a link in an email that led them to enter login credentials on what they thought was a legitimate site. The IT department later discovered that their email account had been compromised, leading to significant unauthorised payments being made by clients due to spoofed communications.

These cases are just a small sampling.

Now let’s discuss ransomware. There’s a common misconception among SME management that ransomware primarily targets larger companies since SMEs seem too small to be lucrative targets for cybercriminals. However, when SMEs do get attacked, ransom demands can be surprisingly low—often between £500 and £1,000—leading many SMEs to pay up without hesitation. This poses significant risks because often their data has already been stolen, and sometimes criminals fail to restore access afterward, leaving SMEs financially strained and unable to operate.

Preventing such attacks in the first place is far more advantageous. Here are several strategies you might consider implementing:

• One of the most impactful steps an SME can take is providing Cyber Awareness Training for employees. Research shows that 90% of data breaches stem from human error; it’s unlikely an employee will intentionally harm your business. However, without proper training, they may unknowingly engage in risky behaviour. Cyber security awareness training is crucial; staff need knowledge about potential threats. Cyber security is not just an IT issue; it’s a business-wide responsibility that requires everyone’s involvement. Effective strategies tend to follow the KISS principle—Keep It Simple Stupid.

• Another cost-effective measure is developing robust policies and procedures related to cyber security that are communicated throughout your organisation and regularly updated to remain relevant. Providing employees with clear guidelines on how to respond if they suspect suspicious activity supports them rather than penalising them for mistakes. Many SMEs lack adequate policies or settle for generic templates found online that seldom meet their needs.

• Review your backup strategy as well. Even if using cloud-based services, your data may not be adequately secured, despite providers’ claims. A better approach would be implementing a backup strategy where your data is backed up nightly onto magnetic media storage that’s stored securely offline. In case of an attack that locks your data, you could wipe affected workstations and restore information from backups without significant downtime.

• EMail remains one of the most common attack vectors. Numerous products claim to block malicious emails effectively; many excel at this task. For SMEs, cost is often a deciding factor when selecting these products. Unfortunately, some still opt for low-cost or free anti-malware solutions. Understanding that quality correlates with price is essential; if it’s free, you’re likely facing issues down the line.

Turning to how your systems might be monitored for security issues, we have been exploring options in the market for an affordable security managed service tailored specifically for SMEs and we believe we have found it! Our solution emphasises simplicity while utilising enterprise-grade technology to streamline daily operations effectively. Our unified platform seamlessly detects, prevents, and responds holistically to cyber threats without hassle or excessive costs.

We are offering a free trial that includes:

a. Email security.

b. Cloud data protection.

c. Automated cyber awareness training.

d. External risk assessment.

e. Endpoint security.

f. Secure browsing practices.

g. Phishing simulations.

h. Plus, as an added bonus: cyber insurance priced based on your risk score within our system—the lower your risk score, the more affordable your insurance!

This service is specifically designed for businesses with 1-250 IT users; while most SMEs typically fall between 10-15 users, we’re flexible! It’s a managed service approach with proactive risk mitigation tailored according to your preferences—all at just £12 per user per month!

We’re also introducing an intuitive cloud software solution focused on data protection that empowers organisations by securing their information while giving IT professionals an easy way to track sensitive data and manage risks effectively. The system routinely audits company data to locate sensitive information and applies necessary updates and encryption automatically.

This method ensures organisations always know what sensitive data they possess while keeping it secure through automatic encryption measures, making data security straightforward so businesses can protect private information as circumstances evolve over time, without needing complex software requiring specialised expertise.

Here are 2 very short videos explaining our solutions.

Why Your Business Needs Protective Monitoring – https://bit.ly/3Qy4u0x

Mastering GDPR Compliance: Safeguarding Your Company – https://bit.ly/4berDPa

Cyber Awareness Training

Investing in cyber awareness training is crucial, especially for SMEs who tend not to have the expertise and resource at their fingertips, to protect themselves against cyber-attacks and scams. Cyber threats are constantly evolving, and smaller businesses are often prime targets for attackers due to perceived weaker security defences. Your staff are key, they are the first line of defence, and potentially, your biggest weakness. This means they must know what the threats are and what simple steps they can take to protect the business.

Here are some key reasons why an SME should be seriously considering a cyber awareness training programme for their staff:

a. Protect Against Cyber Threats

SMEs face risks from phishing, ransomware, and social engineering attacks. Training helps employees recognise and respond to these threats before they cause harm.

b. Reduce Human Error

Most cyber incidents result from human mistakes and are not malicious in nature. Cyber awareness training can significantly reduce mistakes such as clicking on malicious links or using weak passwords. Training teaches employees what security best practice means and how to adopt it.

c. Ensure Regulatory Compliance

Many industries have data protection laws (e.g., GDPR) and other industry led regulations (PCI, FSA etc) that require businesses to safeguard customer data. Cyber awareness training helps SMEs comply with these regulations and avoid fines and reputational damage.

d. Protect Business Reputation

A data breach can damage customer trust and brand reputation, potentially leading to lost business. Proactive cybersecurity measures, including training, help maintain credibility.

e. Minimise Financial Losses

Cyber incidents can lead to financial losses from fraud, legal fees, downtime, and recovery costs. Investing in training is a cost-effective way to mitigate these risks.

f. Strengthen Overall Security Culture

When employees understand cybersecurity risks, they become an active part of the defence strategy, fostering a security-first mindset across the organisation.

g. Improve Incident Response

Trained employees can quickly identify and report security incidents, enabling faster response times and reducing potential damage.

h. Stay Competitive

Many clients and partners prefer working with businesses that prioritise cybersecurity. Demonstrating a commitment to security can be a competitive advantage.

Awareness training doesn’t need to cost that much, and it can be delivered classroom based, either on site or online, or it can be automated. The latter is often the preferred platform for an SME.

Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of each method of delivery.

Classroom-Based Training

Pros:

Interactive Learning – Employees can ask questions, engage in discussions, and get real-time feedback.
Customisable Content – Trainers can tailor content based on specific organisational threats or employee skill levels.
Higher Engagement – In-person or live virtual sessions often result in better engagement and knowledge retention.
Hands-on Practice – Allows for simulations, group exercises, and real-world case studies.

Cons:

Costly – Requires hiring trainers, scheduling sessions, and potential travel expenses.
Time-Consuming – Employees must take time away from work to attend sessions.
Scalability Issues – Difficult to train a large workforce across multiple locations.
Inconsistency – The effectiveness may vary depending on the instructor’s expertise and teaching style.

Automated Training (often AI-Based)

Pros:

Cost-Effective – No need for in-person instructors or travel costs.
Scalable – Easily deployed across an entire organisation, including remote employees.
Flexible Scheduling – Employees can complete training at their own pace.
Consistent Content Delivery – Ensures all employees receive the same training material.
Trackable Progress & Reporting – Automated platforms provide analytics on employee performance and compliance.

Cons:

Limited Engagement – Lack of real-time interaction may result in lower retention.
Generic Content – May not always address specific threats or industry-specific risks.
No Immediate Feedback – Employees may not have an opportunity to clarify doubts in real time.
Potential for Click-Through Learning – Some employees might rush through without fully absorbing the information.

Which one is better? This is somewhat subjective and will depend very much on the type of business you are, your budget and expectations. Generally:

For organisations needing high engagement and tailored content, classroom-based training is ideal.
For large, distributed teams or cost-conscious businesses, automated training is more practical.
A hybrid approach, combining both methods, often works best—using classroom sessions for deep learning and automated modules for ongoing reinforcement.

Here at H2 we can offer both classroom based, in person or on-line, as well as an automated programme which can include induction courses and continual reinforcement. This of course if the more cost effective solution for many SMEs.

Cyber Security Operations

Security operations is a complex subject and there is no doubt that it can be expensive and difficult, even for corporate organisations who generally have the resource, both financial and technical, to run a security operations centre (SOC), or at least can afford to outsource. I saw an RFP from a housing society for a SOC and I would be very interested to see if that contract gets let once the organisation gets the quotes, because I would be shocked if they could afford it.

Their RFP based its premise on the introduction of a Security Information and Event Management system (SIEM), which.in itself, might suggest that they don’t really know what they are asking for, or indeed, what they want. I base this on having designed, built and operated several such operations centres in the past.

Now before the SIEM vendors and resellers pile on, let’s be clear, SIEM systems have their place and are very useful in a SOC, although I would argue that they are most certainly not the end all and be all. My focus these days is on SMEs and for an SME there are several reasons why a SOC and an SIEM may be over the top and a cost too far.

Whilst an SIEM system is a valuable tool for cybersecurity, it comes with several drawbacks, including:

a. High Cost

Expensive Implementation – SIEM systems require significant upfront costs for software, hardware, and licensing.
Ongoing Costs – Maintenance, updates, and skilled personnel add to long-term expenses.

b. Complex Deployment and Management

Difficult Configuration – Setting up a SIEM system to work effectively requires extensive tuning and integration with various security tools.
Frequent Fine-Tuning – To avoid false positives and negatives, organisations must continuously refine alert rules and correlation policies.

c. High Volume of Alerts and False Positives

Alert Fatigue – SIEM systems generate numerous alerts, many of which are false positives, overwhelming security teams.
Difficult Prioritisation – It can be challenging to distinguish between critical threats and routine events without proper tuning.

d. Scalability Issues

Performance Bottlenecks – As an organisation grows, more logs and data sources can slow down the system.
Expensive Scaling – Scaling a SIEM to handle increasing data volumes often requires costly upgrades.

e. Need for Skilled Personnel

Expertise Required – SIEM systems need cybersecurity professionals to manage, analyse, and fine-tune them effectively.
Shortage of Talent – Finding skilled SIEM analysts can be challenging and expensive.

f. Storage and Compliance Challenges

Log Retention Costs – Storing large volumes of logs for compliance can be expensive.
Regulatory Complexity – Ensuring compliance with data protection laws (e.g., GDPR) requires careful log management.

h. Limited Threat Detection Without AI/Automation

Reactive Approach – Many traditional SIEMs rely on pre-set rules, making them less effective against new or sophisticated threats.
Lack of Automation – Without AI-driven analytics, manual investigation can be time-consuming.

Having debunked the usefulness of an SIEM system for an SME, let’s look at what an SME could do to mitigate their cyber risks.

A good cyber security strategy has always been founded upon strength in depth. Sound security architecture, good cyber awareness training, solid access control and identity management, and the ability to protectively monitor your estate for threats, vulnerabilities, and risks.

If you are not monitoring the effectiveness of the protections that you have spent good money on, how do you know it’s money well spent? Are those protections doing what you think they are? Monitoring is central to the identification and detection of threats to your IT systems. It acts as your eyes and ears when detecting and recovering from security incidents and it enables you to ensure that devices are used in accordance with your organisational policies.

Many small to medium-sized businesses struggle with stretched resources, lean budgets, and a critical technical expertise gap. This fight against sophisticated cyber threats and outdated systems turns them into easy targets for cybercriminals. Exposed and at risk, these businesses stagger on the edge of significant disruption, financial loss, and reputational damage. Although on the surface an SIEM system might seem to be what an SME needs, it would not fit the profile of most SMEs, being too resource intensive and costly.

We have been researching the market, looking for a way of providing a security managed service that would serve an SME, at an affordable price. And we think we’ve found it – no, we are SURE we have found it. Simplicity is at its core, employing enterprise-grade technology to simplify and streamline the day-to-day work. Our unified platform and onboarding process, seamlessly detects, prevents, and responds to cyber threats in the most holistic, hassle-free, and cost-effective way.

We are offering a 14 day free trial and will cover:

Email security.
Cloud data.
Automated cyber awareness training.
External risk.
Endpoint security.
Secure browsing.
Phishing simulation.
And as an added bonus we can provide cyber insurance at a price which is directly linked to your risk score within or system. The lower your risk, the cheaper the insurance.

This system is deliberately aimed at 1-250 IT users in any business. Most SMEs come in around 10 to 15 IT users, but we’re not precious about it. It is a managed service, and we have our eyes on the glass and can mitigate your risks automatically, or in concert with you, depending on how you wish to tailor the service. All this for a mere £12 per user per month.

Governance, Risk and Compliance

…. or let’s call it GRC because it is a bit of a mouthful. Two questions arise, firstly what does it mean, and secondly, does it really apply to SMEs?

To answer the first question GRC is a program that comprises those elements which, governed by the cyber-security strategy, provide cyber-security risk assessment, generate appropriate cyber-risk management policies and controls, and enable measurement of compliance with those policies and controls. Let’s not forget those controls required by regulatory compliance which are required by legal and regulatory bodies.

Governance is the process which dictates policy in line with the cyber-security strategy. Governance ensures that the organisation’s cyber-security policies are generated, adopted and amended within an organisation. Governance may be derived from both internal requirements (e.g. audit, board direction, information security) and external sources (e.g. statutory and regulatory requirements).
Risk management is the process by which risks are evaluated in light of business requirements – and the organisation’s risk tolerance or appetite. Risk management and mitigation policies and controls are then designed to achieve an acceptable level of risk to the organisation’s finances, data, reputation etc. The policies and intensity and number of the controls must be balanced against their cost and budgetary considerations, as well as the acceptable level of residual risk remaining once all controls have been implemented. Risk management is also the means by which new risks from emerging threats and new business opportunities are assessed and reduced to an acceptable level.
Compliance is the process by which adherence to risk management policies and controls are measured and gaps are identified. This function is performed by various individuals and teams, including internal audit, risk assessment teams, external regulatory agencies and third-party organizations.

OK, so far so good, but isn’t this all a little over the top for SMEs. Well yes and no. Firstly, every business must comply with the statutory regulations laid down by government and the requirements for governance laid down by various industry standards. PCI is a good example of the latter. If you don’t comply to PCI DSS standards, you simply won’t be allowed to take credit card payments. Maybe not important to all businesses, but it is to many.

Secondly, it is a matter of scale. Everyone in business does some form of risk assessment during the working day – is it safe to take this person on? Is this a good bit of business to acquire or is it too risky? Do we need to diversify? Etc. Even if your risk assessments aren’t formal and you are doing them on the fly, they are still relevant to your business. Cyber Security is no different. Your cyber assets, and in this case, we often mean your data, need to be risk assessed, ie assessing the risk to the business if it all goes pear shaped, and then the right controls applied. This falls under GRC.

So, what kills GRC in business? It’s often a lack of communication and understanding. The lack of understanding comes from not having the relevant expertise to talk to, and I’m not referring to IT techies. They are great at keeping your systems working, be they an in-house resource or a managed service IT company under contract. But they are not cyber security professionals. The latter is a skill set recognised in the industry with its own qualifications and career path.

The lack of communication comes in when you have the relevant expertise to hand, usually outsourced, but the board is simply not listening to what they are being told. So why is that? Well, a big mistake made by some cyber security people is being too technical and speaking in jargon. It doesn’t work and turns people off. When putting across an argument it must be in plain English and be business focused. Management has to see some form of ROI, even it that ROI difficult to measure, based as it probably will be on proving a negative, ie the controls are working because we haven’t been hacked, as opposed to, we haven’t been hacked so we don’t need to budget for this. Another example is talking about phishing, ransomware, hacking etc, when the business wants to hear about insider fraud and intellectual property theft.

My regular readers will be aware of my adherence to the KISS principle – Keep It Simple Stupid. So overly complex GRC tools and solutions won’t work with SMEs regardless of where they sit on the totem pole, either at the lower end of Small up to the higher end of Medium. All GRC principles must be scaled accordingly, and any practitioner used to evaluate your GRC issues must have a firm grasp of the business and apply GRC principles to support that business in a way that the management can immediately see its value. Not easy but very much doable.

When working for HP I had 2 teams, one was techie and the other, focused on GRC, was not so techie and I kept that separation as it was very important.

I am always happy to have a conversation around this subject.

IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT AND ZERO TRUST

Today is a typical January day, cold, wet and miserable. I really didn’t feel like getting out of bed but hey, not a lot of choice until I become a multi-millionaire and pay someone to get out of bed for me – I wish. I’m starting the day with a large coffee from Costa to try and kick start my creative juices and get this blog written. And no, I’m not writing it in Costa, it’s a takeaway. I’ve written several pieces on the dangers of insecure coffee shop WIFI.

Those of you who have managed to plough your way through some of my earlier stuff, will know that I am very big on user awareness training for staff at all levels, believing as I do, that it is arguably one of the quickest wins that an SME can make, to protect themselves against cybercrime. There is however a very close second, and that is identity and access management.

Before I get into that, let’s talk a bit about Zero Trust. You might have heard the term but what exactly does it mean? Zero Trust architecture is a security concept that emphasises the importance of continuous verification and strict access controls within a network environment. It operates on the principle of “trust no one” and assumes that no user or device should be inherently trusted, even if they are within the network perimeter. Instead, Zero Trust focuses on authenticating and authorising every access attempt, regardless of its source or location.

In a Zero Trust architecture, access controls are implemented based on various factors, such as user identity, device health, location, and other contextual information. This approach helps prevent lateral movement within a network, reduces the impact of potential breaches, and improves overall security posture.

Zero Trust architectures typically employ technologies such as multifactor authentication, encryption, micro-segmentation, and continuous monitoring to enforce access controls and detect anomalous behaviour. By adopting a Zero Trust mindset, organisations can enhance their security defences and better protect against modern cyber threats.

Getting back to Identity and Access Control, there is mounting evidence that the message is getting through that, although passwords are very important, they most certainly aren’t the panacea that many think they are. We can see many organisations moving to 2 factor authentication as a norm now. In fact, if you want to be accredited to Cyber Essentials or ISO 27001, it’s a requirement without which you won’t pass. A charity I volunteered for has done just that and not before time, considering the amount of personal data they are holding. But is that enough?

Compromised credentials are very high on the list of cybercrime related incidents that we see and have to deal with. Protecting these identities can be a very technical issue and advice and guidance will be needed to ensure that you are adequately covered. However it needn’t be overly expensive, neither need it be overly complicated. In fact, I’m a great believer in that the simplest solution is often the best solution. I’m an adherent of the KISS principle – Keep It Simple Stupid.

Questions to ask yourself include:

Are your user accounts configured with the minimum level of privilege they need to do their job?
If an employee needs additional privilege to carry out a one off job, how do you ensure that once it’s completed, the privilege is revoked?
What is a privileged account? Typically it’s someone who needs additional privileges as part of their daily tasks, such as adding/removing users, auditing actions, access to more secure areas of the network (finance, management data etc), etc etc. Are you limiting by policy the roles within your organisation that need privileged accounts, and are you specifying explicitly what those privileges are, by role?
Are your privileged accounts subject to greater levels of auditing and scrutiny?
Do you have a joiners and leavers process to manage active accounts?
Do you have a movers process ie employees that change roles and require different levels of access to carry out their new role, either adding or removing privilege?

Another issue that you may need to consider is any accounts that exist on your network that may be used by third party suppliers. Many companies use ‘just in time’ supply management which can require third parties to have access to their network. Another example is people like me who, when carrying out things like vulnerability assessments, may be given privileges to scan the network. Is that revoked at the end of the scan? And of course, there is the IT company you may have under contract who actively have access to your network to carry out maintenance and might actually also have a contract for controlling user privilege. Or perhaps the company you have under contract maintaining your alarms and security cameras which you didn’t know were actually using your network to connect to each other and their control room.

What about logging? What is logging? Every system has a set of logs which can be switched on or off. I often come across networks where logging has been switched off or never activated because its consider to be an overhead you can live without. Well, I disagree with that, quite vehemently. Logging helps you to determine what normal looks like. For example user profiles carry out certain functions within their role. If a user is stepping outside of that profile, you need to find out why. Is it a user who is doing something they simply didn’t realise they shouldn’t, or is it something more serious? Is it an identity that has been created or hi-jacked by a cybercriminal who has managed to gain access? Examination of these logs will help you understand that. There is of course software on the market that will be of great help with this. And of course, what do you do if you are suspicious of an activity or action by a user?

This is a big and crucial issue that deserves attention, more attention that a short blog like this can give it. So if you would like more information, we would be happy to oblige.

Policies and Processes – a topic that can quickly lead to feelings of despair

When discussing cyber security, many envision suspicious figures hunched over screens in dimly lit rooms, perhaps with the scent of Jamaican Woodbines lingering in the air. Unfortunately, this image is misleading; cyber security is often quite routine, especially for those of us focused on defence rather than offence. It fundamentally revolves around People, Process, and Technology.

I published a blog recently about how hackers hack (https://hah2.co.uk/how-do-hackers-hack/). In this article, I delve into how hackers profile individuals and organisations through various methods, frequently utilising what is known as social engineering. This technique is primarily non-technical and hinges on a cybercriminals ability to infiltrate the defences of your employees to extract information. Defending against this threat relies heavily on the first two components of cyber risk management: People and Policy.

For regular readers, it’s clear how much I value cyber awareness training. I consistently emphasise that your staff can be both your most significant asset and your greatest vulnerability. Cyber awareness training is essential and should include educating employees about your organisations structure and operations. They should know whom to contact if they have concerns regarding cyber security or suspect social engineering attempts. This information needs to be embedded in the policy, potentially accompanied by a related process that connects People with Process.

In addition to cyber security policies, we also have data protection policies, which are separate but certainly overlap. While nearly every organisation requires security policies, the necessity and comprehensiveness of data protection policies vary based on the type of business. For instance, you might not immediately think of Estate Agents as data holders, yet they manage substantial amounts of Personally Identifiable Information (PII)—data that can identify an individual. Not long ago, a London estate agent faced an £80,000 fine from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for leaving the personal data of over 18,000 customers exposed for almost two years due to a failure in their data sharing practices.

It’s astonishing how much PII estate agents possess. Consider all the information they request when buying a house! In this case, compromised details included bank statements, salary information, copies of passports, birth dates, and addresses for both tenants and landlords.

Moreover, individuals have the right to sue companies that mishandle their data. Today, law firms even promote “no win no fee” agreements for these cases. Remember that data breaches typically involve numerous individuals—often hundreds or thousands of records.

To solidify the connection between cyber security and data protection, it’s important to note that the Data Protection Act 2018—often referred to as UK GDPR—mandates that personal data must be secured by ‘default and design’. This implies that cyber security measures must be integrated into your data protection processes, potentially increasing the number of policies and procedures necessary to ensure safety and compliance with legal requirements.

Let’s explore what you might need for cyber security. First and foremost, you require a comprehensive policy approved at the board level or by company ownership if there isn’t a formal structure in place. This policy serves to demonstrate the company’s commitment to cyber security and establishes a foundation for what we term an Information Security Management System (ISMS). While you don’t need to adopt formal terminology, it essentially outlines the framework detailing necessary policies, assigns responsibility for keeping them current and relevant, and ensures dissemination among all staff. Essential policies may include but aren’t limited to:

– Top-level policy issued by the board

– Starters and Leavers Policy

– Access Control Policy

– Magnetic Media Policy

– Mobile Working Policy

– Password Policy

– Email Policy

– Acceptable Use Policy

As mentioned earlier, data protection closely aligns with cyber security. Below is a potential list of policies you may need to comply with legal standards. Again, this list is not exhaustive and may seem excessive for some businesses but provides insight into what may be required:

– Data Protection – Overarching Policy

– Data Protection Training

– Data Protection – Consent

– Consent Withdrawal

– Subject Access Request

– Data Protection Complaints

– Retention of Records

– Data Breach Notification (note there is an electronic version of this on the ICO website)

– Data Protection Impact Assessment Procedure

– Security & Control of data protection documentation

– Policy Management Review Procedure

– Internal Data Protection Breach Register

– Retention & Disposal of Records Register

– Data Protection Officer (DPO) Responsibilities

– Required records to be maintained

Most policies are readily available online; however, knowing what you truly need versus what you can do without can be challenging. Too often people download templates only to modify them superficially while hoping for satisfactory results.

Over time, our approach has evolved alongside legislative changes both here and in Europe as well as shifts in working practices. We’ve dedicated countless hours researching solutions tailored to meet requirements that adapt into systems suitable for all business types—not only affordable but also compliant with standards like Cyber Essentials if needed. Flexibility has become crucial due to new working paradigms; traditional security systems where everyone operates within secure boundaries protected by firewalls are outdated. Today’s protective systems must function seamlessly whether you’re at home, on the move, or in the office, and your policies must reflect that.

When we first engage with prospective clients, we offer a free trial to assess their needs, we frequently discover they lack clarity on what data they hold or its location. They might have a vague understanding—perhaps it’s stored on cloud servers, with laptops or desktops accessing data on the cloud. However, once we implement our software for discovery purposes, we often find numerous copies stored on laptops/desktops alongside cloud servers. How does this happen? Over time—and particularly with many adopting hybrid work models—employees log onto cloud services remotely using unstable internet connections; they download necessary files to work offline then neglect to delete them after re-uploading. Or they may share files via email without realising it leaves sensitive information attached to their email server.

Audit trails present another issue: If the ICO investigates, having clear records indicating who created/copied/deleted/forwarded data is crucial. Additionally, individuals are entitled to submit Data Subject Access Requests (DSARs), compelling you to disclose any held data regarding them—a legal obligation you cannot refuse. I know of a financial firm that took almost three weeks just to fulfil a DSAR request which diverted an employee from billing tasks during that time.

Our solution addresses today’s requirements effectively—it even includes an encryption system—all under one monthly fee. You can trial it at no cost; we’d be surprised if after seeing its capabilities along with our incredibly low managed service rates you didn’t want to keep it!

What are the effects of downtime on your business?

I’ve talked in the past about what SMEs really care about when it comes to cyber security. Do they really care about the technicalities of an attack or scam? Do they really care about the technical aspects of a piece of protective software or hardware? My argument is that they don’t give a damn. What they want to know can be summed up pretty easily.

How vulnerable are they to an attack and/or scam?
What would be the effects if that attack or scam succeeded?
What can they do about it, and how much will it cost them?

I wrote mostly about points a and c in a blog earlier in the year, https://hah2.co.uk/what-do-sme-owners-and-directors-want-from-cyber-security/, and I’ve included the link if you want to read it. This time I’m concentrating on point b and the effects of the downtime that it creates.

Downtime following a cyberattack can have serious consequences for businesses, and individuals. We can categorise these into several key areas:

Financial Costs

Lost Revenue: For e-commerce platforms, financial institutions, or other time-sensitive industries, downtime directly results in revenue losses.
Operational Costs: Companies may need to pay overtime to IT staff, hire external cybersecurity experts, or invest in replacement hardware or software.
Regulatory Fines: Non-compliance with regulations like GDPR or industry focused standards, due to downtime or data breaches can lead to significant fines.

Damage to Reputation

Loss of Customer Trust: Downtime can erode confidence, especially if sensitive customer data is exposed or if services are unavailable for extended periods.
Brand Damage: Affected organisations may face negative publicity, making it harder to attract and retain customers or partners.

Operational Disruption

Service Outages: Critical systems might be offline, affecting production lines, supply chains, or essential services.
- Loss of Productivity: Employees unable to access IT systems are effectively idle, causing delays in work and project completion.

Data Loss

Corruption or Deletion: Cyberattacks like ransomware can encrypt or destroy critical data, which may take days or weeks to recover, even with backups.
Intellectual Property Theft: If attackers steal proprietary information, it can be sold to competitors or leaked online.

Security Gap

Exploitation of Vulnerabilities: Downtime often exposes weak points in an organisation’s infrastructure, which may need to be patched or rebuilt.
Increased Risk of Future Attacks: Downtime may signal to attackers that the organisation is a viable target.

Legal and Regulatory Implications

Breach of Contract: Failure to meet service-level agreements (SLAs) due to downtime can result in legal action from customers or partners.
Insurance Implications: Cyber insurance claims may be denied if the company failed to follow adequate preventative measures.

Psychological and Social Impact

Employee Stress: Staff may feel pressured to resolve issues quickly, leading to burnout.
Customer Frustration: Extended downtime can alienate loyal customers, particularly in industries where continuity is critical, such as healthcare or finance.

Broader Economic and Societal Impacts

Supply Chain Disruption: Downtime in one organisation can ripple through its partners, affecting entire supply chains.
- Critical Infrastructure Risks: Attacks on essential services like utilities or healthcare systems can have life-threatening consequences.

I have blogged many times about the mitigation strategies you can take, that don’t need to break the bank, but the bottom line, proactive measures can significantly reduce the impact of cyberattacks and the associated downtime. Understand your vulnerabilities and threats, base your spend on protecting against those threats, starting with the most serious, and then working down. Don’t try and get to 100% security, it doesn’t exist, so understand what risks you find acceptable and what risks you don’t.

Work v Life Balance

A little change this week from my usual promotion of cyber security issues, prompted, at least in part, by the changes affecting SMEs by the budget, and also because I do tend to interact a lot with HR and recruitment company’s largely because of the amounts of personal identifiable information that they hold and their concern about those budget changes.

There are going to be different views about those changes, driven by lots of things ranging from political views to how they will impact individuals and I’m not going to pore oil on those differing views. That’s not the focus of this piece.

My first 30 years employment, from age 15 to age 40, was spent in the public sector, 25 years in the Army and 5 years in the NHS. I then left and spent 2 years in a UK company before moving on to a major US corporation, followed by 2 more major US corporations. By that time I’d had enough and wanted to run my own business my own way. A challenge which never stops but has its rewards. The contrast between the attitudes in the UK and in the US are stark, even given that the UK has attitudes to employment and laws, which are much more onerous than they are in Western Europe.

One of the first things that hits you in a US corporation is the expectation that you will work as long as they want you to, go where they want you to, and do what they want you to, all within the same salary. Some managers are harsher than others of course, but the stock price will win every argument, and I well remember the Chairman of my first company openly admitting that they used staffing levels to control the stock price. That meant that they would cut staff to keep the markets happy, without a second thought and absolutely hated that they couldn’t do that in Europe because of the employment laws. The US employees had no such protection.

There were many examples of how employees were often impacted by the attitude of the senior management across the pond. One such sticks out when I was running a team in the middle east. Our weekends were Friday and Saturday, we worked Sundays. One Friday the team had hired a boat, privately between us, and we were anchored offshore with the team diving off the boat into some very warm waters and having a good time. My mobile phone rang, and I was told that I needed to get online and produce some stats that were needed immediately. All the European teams were doing this. I told him we couldn’t get to the office and even sent him some photos that I took with my phone to show him where we were and reminded him it was our weekend.

Needless to say, I was reprimanded for this and told that I wasn’t being loyal. I was a manager who insisted on looking after my guys (and gals) but that wasn’t universally appreciated by those above.

So, what is senior management often missing when they treat staff poorly, when they are demanding and even sometimes, demeaning. Managers are looking for productivity, of course they are, without that the company goes under, but is a happy staff more productive than an unhappy one. If we are paying a low wage and making staff claim UC to make it up, does that demean the staff member as well as putting the burden on the taxpayer. Going back to my time in the Army in the late seventies, I remember being a Lance Corporal and qualifying for supplementary benefit, which I found demeaning. Mind you it got worse, I was promoted to Corporal and no longer qualified and lost about a tenner a week – a lot of dosh back then.

Let’s now look at what a good work-life balance is going to give us. Is it essential for maintaining overall well-being and improving not just the personal aspects of life, but also does it improve those professional aspects that increase productivity? I’m not declaring myself one way or another and would prefer others to come to their own conclusions.

a. Improved Mental Health

Reduces stress and anxiety.
Helps prevent burnout by creating time for rest and self-care.
Encourages a clearer mind, enhancing focus and decision-making.

b. Enhanced Physical Health

Allows for regular exercise and proper sleep.
Reduces the risk of stress-related illnesses, such as heart disease and high blood pressure, reducing time off for illness.

c. Increased Productivity

Balancing personal and professional priorities leads to greater focus and efficiency at work.
Employees who are well-rested and satisfied with their personal lives tend to be more motivated.

d. Stronger Relationships

Allocating time for family and friends strengthens personal bonds and social support networks.
Improves communication and connection with families.

e. Greater Job Satisfaction

Employees who maintain balance are more likely to enjoy their work, feel fulfilled, and remain engaged.
Reduces turnover rates by creating a supportive work environment.

f. Personal Growth and Fulfilment

Provides opportunities to pursue hobbies, interests, and personal goals.
Encourages learning and development outside of work, leading to a more well-rounded life.

g. Better Work Culture

Promotes a positive workplace where employees feel respected and valued.
Encourages teamwork and collaboration by reducing tension and conflict.

h. Increased Creativity and Innovation

Taking breaks and engaging in diverse activities fosters creative thinking and problem-solving.

We can argue that a poor work-life balance on the other hand, can have wide-ranging effects, impacting mental, physical, and social well-being as well as professional performance. Here’s a breakdown:

a. Physical Health Issues

Increased stress levels: Chronic stress can lead to headaches, fatigue, muscle tension, and weakened immunity.
Higher risk of chronic illnesses: Conditions such as heart disease, obesity, and diabetes can result from prolonged stress and lack of physical activity.
Sleep problems: Difficulty in disconnecting from work may lead to insomnia or poor-quality sleep.

b. Mental Health Challenges

Burnout: Persistent overwork can result in emotional exhaustion, reduced productivity, and detachment from work.
Anxiety and depression: Long hours and the pressure to perform can exacerbate mental health issues.
Reduced focus and creativity: Mental fatigue from a poor balance impairs cognitive functioning and decision-making.

c. Professional Consequences

Decreased productivity: Overworking may initially boost

So, what do I personally, conclude from this and why do I care? Well firstly I’m a human being and so should care and secondly, I’m a business owner and want my staff focused, productive, great for clients to interact with, responsive and who look forward to coming in every day, or at least most days, every day is probably a stretch. I will also readily admit that some of these points aren’t my own, I have cribbed from some research I did into this area.

What is your take? I would expect differing views and that’s OK, we all face issues every day in business, some we have in common, and some are unique to a particular business. I’m not looking for an argument, just some mature reflection.

Cyber Security Skills Gap

We often hear, particularly withing the Cyber Security industry itself, of a skills gap and a real problem recruiting and retaining cyber security professionals. Why and is it real or imagined? There is a very useful report you can reference from the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), which I’d recommend.

Firstly, let’s look at the market. As my regular readers will know, I work largely in the SME market, having come from the corporate market where I worked for many years. Even there, true cyber security professionals were always hard to find and it’s very important to recognise the difference between cyber security skills and experience, and technical skills and experience.

Let me explain. Within the SME sector there has always been the perception that technical skills were what is needed when putting in place protections against cybercrime. That does seem to be changing, and I asked the question of a business audience a couple of weeks ago; did they think cyber security was a business issue or best left to the techies. 100% said business which is much different than when I first asked this group the same question 18 months ago, when about 80% said it was a technical issue. This last result was somewhat heart-warming.

So why does technology get pushed so hard in that sector? If we look at the corporate market for a moment, we’ll see that these organisations have a solid security team in place, run by a Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), who often reports to a Chief Information Officer (CIO) who is a board member. This allows them to build a team covering most of the security skills needed, cyber generalists and governance, risk and compliance specialists amongst others, and techies as well. They will often only outsource skills only needed now and again. But even here they often struggle to recruit.

SMEs simply don’t have that organisation in place, and even at the top ‘M’ end of the market, those company’s knocking on the door of the corporate market, they still outsource most of their IT and with it, their cyber security. The reason why an SME would choose to do this is obvious, it’s cost. They can’t afford to employ even IT staff full time and those that do, often have one person whose main role is to keep on top of their outsource partner.

A big issue facing SME organisations is balancing limited resources with the growing complexity and volume of cyber threats. The lack of resources is compounded by an overall dearth of cyber-security skills in general, and a real lack of skills in mid-sized companies and the IT companies they often outsource to.

Allied to this issue is that many IT support company’s, focused on the SME market, don’t really have any more of a handle on cyber security issues and how to fix them, than the SMEs themselves. This might sound harsh but consider that their business is all about selling in hardware and software licences, the more they sell, the stronger their business. Obvious right? That makes them focused on the technologies they sell, firewalls, anti-virus etc, and they will have technical skills needed to support and maintain those products. That’s all fine but ask them some simple questions:

Have they fully identified your security assets? Security assets are not just hardware and software, in fact those are often the least of your worries. It’s the data, where it is and how it’s protected that is important.
Have they done a risk assessment on those assets.
Have they recommended or implemented controls to manage the risk down to your acceptable residual risk level. That is assuming they have spoken to you about what that acceptable risk is.

It’s very important that business owners grasp the difference between the technical requirements of their networks, and the business requirement.

Cyber security professionals will focus on encompassing all aspects of protecting digital assets, IT systems and networks, from unintended or unauthorised access, change or destruction. Cybersecurity focuses on a devising a security strategy and identifies controls, processes, and technologies to ensure the protection of data, programs, networks and associated software from unauthorised access or attack. It is focused on People, Process and then Technology.

Technical security focuses on the technologies employed as controls to remediate the risks defined in the risk assessments carried out. Risk assessment is essential because without it, you can’t be sure that you have the right controls in the right place doing what you think they are doing. In other words, it helps to ensure that your spend is targeted correctly and you’re not wasting money.

And that last piece is what your local IT provider is not doing. They look at tech, not the business.

Getting back to the skills gap, it’s clear that whilst that gap exists it probably isn’t hitting SMEs hard because they weren’t invested in those skills in the first place in the way the corporate market is. SMEs tend to outsource those things that aren’t their core business, including IT, HR and payroll etc, so why not cyber security? The answer is often because they don’t think they need to, often until it’s too late. Having someone on tap that you can contact for advice and guidance is worth every penny. Trust me – I’m a cyber security pro!

H2 provides affordable and flexible one-off and ongoing data protection and cyber risk protection services designed specifically for SMEs; at a price they can afford. Our advice and guidance takes a unique look at the problems facing SMEs whilst calling on our vast experience working for the larger organisations and government departments.

To learn more about the services we provide please click here https://www.hah2.co.uk/

Alternatively, please feel free to give us a call or email

T: 0800 4947478

M: 07702 019060

E: kevin_hawkins@hah2.co.uk

Trust H2 – Making sure your information is secure

Author: Kevin Hawkins